Endoscopic assessment of failed fundoplication: A case for standardization

Arpad Juhasz, Abhishek Sundaram, Masato Hoshino, Tommy H. Lee, Charles Filipi, Sumeet K. Mittal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Preoperative endoscopic assessment of the failed fundoplication is instrumental in diagnosis and surgical management. Endoscopy is a routine and essential part of the workup for a failed fundoplication, but no clear guidelines exist for reporting endoscopic findings. This study aimed to compare endoscopic findings reported by community physicians (gastroenterologists and surgeons) with the findings of the authors (esophageal center) for patients who underwent reoperative intervention after a previous antireflux procedure. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients who underwent reoperation after a failed antireflux operation between 1 December 2003 and 30 June 2010. Endoscopic findings as reported by the outside physician and by the esophageal center endoscopist were reviewed and compared. Results: During the study period, 229 patients underwent reoperation. Of these patients, 20 did not have endoscopy performed by an outside physician and were excluded from the study, leaving 208 patients. The endoscopic reports of the esophageal center physician included 97 cases of hiatal hernia (64 type 1 and 33 types 2 and 3), 52 slipped fundoplications, 61 disrupted fundoplications, 30 intrathoracic fundoplications, 25 twisted fundoplications, 14 two-compartment stomachs, and 27 cases of Barrett's esophagus. Outside physicians identified 68% of the hiatal hernias and 61% of the paraesophageal hernias reported by the authors. Only 32% of the outside reports mentioned a previous fundoplication. Furthermore, only 17% of the slipped fundoplications and 30% of the disrupted fundoplications were so described. Outside physicians identified 19 of the 27 patients with Barrett's esophagus. Conclusion: Fundoplication changes described by the general endoscopist are inadequate. With an increasing population of patients who have undergone prior antireflux surgery, incorporation of fundoplication assessment in an endoscopic curriculum may be helpful.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3761-3766
Number of pages6
JournalSurgical Endoscopy
Volume25
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

Fundoplication
Physicians
Hiatal Hernia
Barrett Esophagus
Reoperation
Endoscopy
Curriculum
Stomach
Databases
Guidelines

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Juhasz, A., Sundaram, A., Hoshino, M., Lee, T. H., Filipi, C., & Mittal, S. K. (2011). Endoscopic assessment of failed fundoplication: A case for standardization. Surgical Endoscopy, 25(12), 3761-3766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1785-z

Endoscopic assessment of failed fundoplication : A case for standardization. / Juhasz, Arpad; Sundaram, Abhishek; Hoshino, Masato; Lee, Tommy H.; Filipi, Charles; Mittal, Sumeet K.

In: Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 25, No. 12, 12.2011, p. 3761-3766.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Juhasz, A, Sundaram, A, Hoshino, M, Lee, TH, Filipi, C & Mittal, SK 2011, 'Endoscopic assessment of failed fundoplication: A case for standardization', Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 3761-3766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1785-z
Juhasz, Arpad ; Sundaram, Abhishek ; Hoshino, Masato ; Lee, Tommy H. ; Filipi, Charles ; Mittal, Sumeet K. / Endoscopic assessment of failed fundoplication : A case for standardization. In: Surgical Endoscopy. 2011 ; Vol. 25, No. 12. pp. 3761-3766.
@article{72513979aac9462483ca88a1f64789d6,
title = "Endoscopic assessment of failed fundoplication: A case for standardization",
abstract = "Background: Preoperative endoscopic assessment of the failed fundoplication is instrumental in diagnosis and surgical management. Endoscopy is a routine and essential part of the workup for a failed fundoplication, but no clear guidelines exist for reporting endoscopic findings. This study aimed to compare endoscopic findings reported by community physicians (gastroenterologists and surgeons) with the findings of the authors (esophageal center) for patients who underwent reoperative intervention after a previous antireflux procedure. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients who underwent reoperation after a failed antireflux operation between 1 December 2003 and 30 June 2010. Endoscopic findings as reported by the outside physician and by the esophageal center endoscopist were reviewed and compared. Results: During the study period, 229 patients underwent reoperation. Of these patients, 20 did not have endoscopy performed by an outside physician and were excluded from the study, leaving 208 patients. The endoscopic reports of the esophageal center physician included 97 cases of hiatal hernia (64 type 1 and 33 types 2 and 3), 52 slipped fundoplications, 61 disrupted fundoplications, 30 intrathoracic fundoplications, 25 twisted fundoplications, 14 two-compartment stomachs, and 27 cases of Barrett's esophagus. Outside physicians identified 68{\%} of the hiatal hernias and 61{\%} of the paraesophageal hernias reported by the authors. Only 32{\%} of the outside reports mentioned a previous fundoplication. Furthermore, only 17{\%} of the slipped fundoplications and 30{\%} of the disrupted fundoplications were so described. Outside physicians identified 19 of the 27 patients with Barrett's esophagus. Conclusion: Fundoplication changes described by the general endoscopist are inadequate. With an increasing population of patients who have undergone prior antireflux surgery, incorporation of fundoplication assessment in an endoscopic curriculum may be helpful.",
author = "Arpad Juhasz and Abhishek Sundaram and Masato Hoshino and Lee, {Tommy H.} and Charles Filipi and Mittal, {Sumeet K.}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-011-1785-z",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "3761--3766",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endoscopic assessment of failed fundoplication

T2 - A case for standardization

AU - Juhasz, Arpad

AU - Sundaram, Abhishek

AU - Hoshino, Masato

AU - Lee, Tommy H.

AU - Filipi, Charles

AU - Mittal, Sumeet K.

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - Background: Preoperative endoscopic assessment of the failed fundoplication is instrumental in diagnosis and surgical management. Endoscopy is a routine and essential part of the workup for a failed fundoplication, but no clear guidelines exist for reporting endoscopic findings. This study aimed to compare endoscopic findings reported by community physicians (gastroenterologists and surgeons) with the findings of the authors (esophageal center) for patients who underwent reoperative intervention after a previous antireflux procedure. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients who underwent reoperation after a failed antireflux operation between 1 December 2003 and 30 June 2010. Endoscopic findings as reported by the outside physician and by the esophageal center endoscopist were reviewed and compared. Results: During the study period, 229 patients underwent reoperation. Of these patients, 20 did not have endoscopy performed by an outside physician and were excluded from the study, leaving 208 patients. The endoscopic reports of the esophageal center physician included 97 cases of hiatal hernia (64 type 1 and 33 types 2 and 3), 52 slipped fundoplications, 61 disrupted fundoplications, 30 intrathoracic fundoplications, 25 twisted fundoplications, 14 two-compartment stomachs, and 27 cases of Barrett's esophagus. Outside physicians identified 68% of the hiatal hernias and 61% of the paraesophageal hernias reported by the authors. Only 32% of the outside reports mentioned a previous fundoplication. Furthermore, only 17% of the slipped fundoplications and 30% of the disrupted fundoplications were so described. Outside physicians identified 19 of the 27 patients with Barrett's esophagus. Conclusion: Fundoplication changes described by the general endoscopist are inadequate. With an increasing population of patients who have undergone prior antireflux surgery, incorporation of fundoplication assessment in an endoscopic curriculum may be helpful.

AB - Background: Preoperative endoscopic assessment of the failed fundoplication is instrumental in diagnosis and surgical management. Endoscopy is a routine and essential part of the workup for a failed fundoplication, but no clear guidelines exist for reporting endoscopic findings. This study aimed to compare endoscopic findings reported by community physicians (gastroenterologists and surgeons) with the findings of the authors (esophageal center) for patients who underwent reoperative intervention after a previous antireflux procedure. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients who underwent reoperation after a failed antireflux operation between 1 December 2003 and 30 June 2010. Endoscopic findings as reported by the outside physician and by the esophageal center endoscopist were reviewed and compared. Results: During the study period, 229 patients underwent reoperation. Of these patients, 20 did not have endoscopy performed by an outside physician and were excluded from the study, leaving 208 patients. The endoscopic reports of the esophageal center physician included 97 cases of hiatal hernia (64 type 1 and 33 types 2 and 3), 52 slipped fundoplications, 61 disrupted fundoplications, 30 intrathoracic fundoplications, 25 twisted fundoplications, 14 two-compartment stomachs, and 27 cases of Barrett's esophagus. Outside physicians identified 68% of the hiatal hernias and 61% of the paraesophageal hernias reported by the authors. Only 32% of the outside reports mentioned a previous fundoplication. Furthermore, only 17% of the slipped fundoplications and 30% of the disrupted fundoplications were so described. Outside physicians identified 19 of the 27 patients with Barrett's esophagus. Conclusion: Fundoplication changes described by the general endoscopist are inadequate. With an increasing population of patients who have undergone prior antireflux surgery, incorporation of fundoplication assessment in an endoscopic curriculum may be helpful.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82055166433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82055166433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-011-1785-z

DO - 10.1007/s00464-011-1785-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 21643878

AN - SCOPUS:82055166433

VL - 25

SP - 3761

EP - 3766

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 12

ER -