Energy consumption boomtowns in the United States: Community responses to a cryptocurrency boom

Pierce Greenberg, Dylan Bugden

Research output: Contribution to journalShort survey

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While scholars have studied the impacts of energy development booms on local communities in the U.S., much less is known about towns experiencing energy consumption booms from industries such as cryptocurrency mining. This article proposes that energy consumption boomtowns are unique in the risks, benefits, and conflicts they create—and that they provide fruitful areas of research for energy social scientists. We illustrate this point with a brief case study of Chelan County, Washington—where an influx of crypto mining over the past five years has stirred community debate. We collected more than 100 newspaper articles, public comments, and public meeting recordings to identify the cautions, hesitations, and criticisms that have caused local regulators to take a precautionary approach. We highlight five key points of the debate that may be of interest to energy social scientists: (1) impacts on the local energy supply and prices, (2) unclear socioeconomic benefits to the county, (3) the illegitimacy of cryptocurrency, (4) environmental considerations, and (5) a disconnect with local legacy industries and community economic identity. We conclude by proposing areas of future social science research on energy consumption booms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)162-167
Number of pages6
JournalEnergy Research and Social Science
Volume50
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

energy consumption
Energy utilization
energy
social scientist
illegitimacy
community
energy supply
industry
Social sciences
recording
Industry
newspaper
criticism
social science
town
Economics
economics
Electronic money

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
  • Fuel Technology
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Energy consumption boomtowns in the United States : Community responses to a cryptocurrency boom. / Greenberg, Pierce; Bugden, Dylan.

In: Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 50, 01.04.2019, p. 162-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalShort survey

@article{c4d5d637aef948a19a6a8fff1861f551,
title = "Energy consumption boomtowns in the United States: Community responses to a cryptocurrency boom",
abstract = "While scholars have studied the impacts of energy development booms on local communities in the U.S., much less is known about towns experiencing energy consumption booms from industries such as cryptocurrency mining. This article proposes that energy consumption boomtowns are unique in the risks, benefits, and conflicts they create—and that they provide fruitful areas of research for energy social scientists. We illustrate this point with a brief case study of Chelan County, Washington—where an influx of crypto mining over the past five years has stirred community debate. We collected more than 100 newspaper articles, public comments, and public meeting recordings to identify the cautions, hesitations, and criticisms that have caused local regulators to take a precautionary approach. We highlight five key points of the debate that may be of interest to energy social scientists: (1) impacts on the local energy supply and prices, (2) unclear socioeconomic benefits to the county, (3) the illegitimacy of cryptocurrency, (4) environmental considerations, and (5) a disconnect with local legacy industries and community economic identity. We conclude by proposing areas of future social science research on energy consumption booms.",
author = "Pierce Greenberg and Dylan Bugden",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "162--167",
journal = "Energy Research and Social Science",
issn = "2214-6296",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy consumption boomtowns in the United States

T2 - Community responses to a cryptocurrency boom

AU - Greenberg, Pierce

AU - Bugden, Dylan

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - While scholars have studied the impacts of energy development booms on local communities in the U.S., much less is known about towns experiencing energy consumption booms from industries such as cryptocurrency mining. This article proposes that energy consumption boomtowns are unique in the risks, benefits, and conflicts they create—and that they provide fruitful areas of research for energy social scientists. We illustrate this point with a brief case study of Chelan County, Washington—where an influx of crypto mining over the past five years has stirred community debate. We collected more than 100 newspaper articles, public comments, and public meeting recordings to identify the cautions, hesitations, and criticisms that have caused local regulators to take a precautionary approach. We highlight five key points of the debate that may be of interest to energy social scientists: (1) impacts on the local energy supply and prices, (2) unclear socioeconomic benefits to the county, (3) the illegitimacy of cryptocurrency, (4) environmental considerations, and (5) a disconnect with local legacy industries and community economic identity. We conclude by proposing areas of future social science research on energy consumption booms.

AB - While scholars have studied the impacts of energy development booms on local communities in the U.S., much less is known about towns experiencing energy consumption booms from industries such as cryptocurrency mining. This article proposes that energy consumption boomtowns are unique in the risks, benefits, and conflicts they create—and that they provide fruitful areas of research for energy social scientists. We illustrate this point with a brief case study of Chelan County, Washington—where an influx of crypto mining over the past five years has stirred community debate. We collected more than 100 newspaper articles, public comments, and public meeting recordings to identify the cautions, hesitations, and criticisms that have caused local regulators to take a precautionary approach. We highlight five key points of the debate that may be of interest to energy social scientists: (1) impacts on the local energy supply and prices, (2) unclear socioeconomic benefits to the county, (3) the illegitimacy of cryptocurrency, (4) environmental considerations, and (5) a disconnect with local legacy industries and community economic identity. We conclude by proposing areas of future social science research on energy consumption booms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058659757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058659757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.005

DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.005

M3 - Short survey

AN - SCOPUS:85058659757

VL - 50

SP - 162

EP - 167

JO - Energy Research and Social Science

JF - Energy Research and Social Science

SN - 2214-6296

ER -