Esophageal shortening during the era of laparoscopic surgery

Ziad T. Awad, Sumeet K. Mittal, Terese A. Roth, Peter I. Anderson, William A. Wilfley, Charles Filipi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations


An effective method for determining the presence of a short esophagus preoperatively would be helpful to surgeons. In this study 260 patients underwent primary laparoscopic antireflux surgery; 44 of them were suspected to have esophageal shortening on the basis of: (1) Barrett's esophagus or evidence of peptic stricture formation on endoscopy; (2) an irreducible hiatal hernia ≥ 5 cm in length on upright barium esophagram; or (3) a short esophagus on manometric analysis, defined as 2 SD below normal for height. Six patients without preoperative criteria required extensive esophageal mobilization and intraoperative endoscopic/laparoscopic assessment. Preoperative results were then compared with intraoperative esophageal length assessments. Altogether, 13 patients (5% of the whole series) underwent a lengthening procedure: left thoracoscopically assisted laparoscopic Collis gastroplasty (n = 11) or open transthoracic Collis gastroplasty (n = 2) plus antireflux repair (Nissen fundoplication in 9 and Toupet repair in 4). Among the preoperative tests, endoscopy had the highest sensitivity rate (61%); a combination of tests resulted in an increase in the specificity (63-100%) without a corresponding increase in sensitivity (28-42%). Preoperative testing is thus useful for predicting the need for an esophageal lengthening procedure. Endoscopy is the best screening test for the short esophagus. A well planned prospective trial to test the reliability of each test is needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)558-561
Number of pages4
JournalWorld Journal of Surgery
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 2001

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery


Dive into the research topics of 'Esophageal shortening during the era of laparoscopic surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this