Ethical considerations in the use of nitrous oxide in pediatric dentistry.

Nicholas J. Levering, Jos V. M. Welie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nitrous oxide (N2O) has become a routine intervention in contemporary American dental practice, especially in the management of children. However, routines translate to confidence which in turn may lead to overconfidence, such that possible risks and misuses are insufficiently acknowledged. This article ethically evaluates the use of nitrous oxide as a practice routine in treating children. Nitrous oxide administration is analyzed in reference to three internationally acknowledged principles of dental ethics: nonmaleficence, beneficence, and patient autonomy. In reference to the principle of nonmaleficence, the potential for adverse effects of N2O is discussed, particularly when it is administered in conjunction with other sedatives and anesthetics. The importance of abiding by clinical protocols is emphasized. Next, in reference to the principle of beneficence, the authors address the problematic application of N2O for the benefit of individuals other than the patient (e.g., dentists and parents). Finally, the importance of respecting patient autonomy is discussed, specifically the need to obtain explicit consent for N2O. The article supports the continued use of nitrous oxide but advises greater attention to how and why it is administered. Four recommendations are offered for an ethically sound usage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-47
Number of pages8
JournalThe Journal of the American College of Dentists
Volume77
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Beneficence
Pediatric Dentistry
Nitrous Oxide
Dental Ethics
Clinical Protocols
Dentists
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Anesthetics
Tooth
Parents

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Ethical considerations in the use of nitrous oxide in pediatric dentistry. / Levering, Nicholas J.; Welie, Jos V. M.

In: The Journal of the American College of Dentists, Vol. 77, No. 2, 06.2010, p. 40-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{055a29b01e2d4d4085cd335756d72fa0,
title = "Ethical considerations in the use of nitrous oxide in pediatric dentistry.",
abstract = "Nitrous oxide (N2O) has become a routine intervention in contemporary American dental practice, especially in the management of children. However, routines translate to confidence which in turn may lead to overconfidence, such that possible risks and misuses are insufficiently acknowledged. This article ethically evaluates the use of nitrous oxide as a practice routine in treating children. Nitrous oxide administration is analyzed in reference to three internationally acknowledged principles of dental ethics: nonmaleficence, beneficence, and patient autonomy. In reference to the principle of nonmaleficence, the potential for adverse effects of N2O is discussed, particularly when it is administered in conjunction with other sedatives and anesthetics. The importance of abiding by clinical protocols is emphasized. Next, in reference to the principle of beneficence, the authors address the problematic application of N2O for the benefit of individuals other than the patient (e.g., dentists and parents). Finally, the importance of respecting patient autonomy is discussed, specifically the need to obtain explicit consent for N2O. The article supports the continued use of nitrous oxide but advises greater attention to how and why it is administered. Four recommendations are offered for an ethically sound usage.",
author = "Levering, {Nicholas J.} and Welie, {Jos V. M.}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "77",
pages = "40--47",
journal = "The Journal of the American College of Dentists",
issn = "0002-7979",
publisher = "American College of Dentists",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical considerations in the use of nitrous oxide in pediatric dentistry.

AU - Levering, Nicholas J.

AU - Welie, Jos V. M.

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Nitrous oxide (N2O) has become a routine intervention in contemporary American dental practice, especially in the management of children. However, routines translate to confidence which in turn may lead to overconfidence, such that possible risks and misuses are insufficiently acknowledged. This article ethically evaluates the use of nitrous oxide as a practice routine in treating children. Nitrous oxide administration is analyzed in reference to three internationally acknowledged principles of dental ethics: nonmaleficence, beneficence, and patient autonomy. In reference to the principle of nonmaleficence, the potential for adverse effects of N2O is discussed, particularly when it is administered in conjunction with other sedatives and anesthetics. The importance of abiding by clinical protocols is emphasized. Next, in reference to the principle of beneficence, the authors address the problematic application of N2O for the benefit of individuals other than the patient (e.g., dentists and parents). Finally, the importance of respecting patient autonomy is discussed, specifically the need to obtain explicit consent for N2O. The article supports the continued use of nitrous oxide but advises greater attention to how and why it is administered. Four recommendations are offered for an ethically sound usage.

AB - Nitrous oxide (N2O) has become a routine intervention in contemporary American dental practice, especially in the management of children. However, routines translate to confidence which in turn may lead to overconfidence, such that possible risks and misuses are insufficiently acknowledged. This article ethically evaluates the use of nitrous oxide as a practice routine in treating children. Nitrous oxide administration is analyzed in reference to three internationally acknowledged principles of dental ethics: nonmaleficence, beneficence, and patient autonomy. In reference to the principle of nonmaleficence, the potential for adverse effects of N2O is discussed, particularly when it is administered in conjunction with other sedatives and anesthetics. The importance of abiding by clinical protocols is emphasized. Next, in reference to the principle of beneficence, the authors address the problematic application of N2O for the benefit of individuals other than the patient (e.g., dentists and parents). Finally, the importance of respecting patient autonomy is discussed, specifically the need to obtain explicit consent for N2O. The article supports the continued use of nitrous oxide but advises greater attention to how and why it is administered. Four recommendations are offered for an ethically sound usage.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957270972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957270972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 77

SP - 40

EP - 47

JO - The Journal of the American College of Dentists

JF - The Journal of the American College of Dentists

SN - 0002-7979

IS - 2

ER -