Abstract
The purpose of this pilot study was to compare embedded audio feedback (EAF), which faculty provided using the iPad® application iAnnotate® PDF to insert audio comments and written feedback (WF), inserted electronically on student papers in a series of writing assignments. Goals included determining whether EAF provides more useful guidance to students than WF and whether EAF promotes connectedness among students and faculty. An additional goal was to ascertain the efficiency and acceptance of EAF as a grading tool by nursing faculty. The pilot study was a quasi-experimental, cross-over, posttest-only design. The project was completed in an Informatics in Health Care course. Faculty alternated the two feedback methods on four papers written by each student. Results of surveys and focus groups revealed that students and faculty had mixed feelings about this technology. Student preferences were equally divided between EAF and WF, with 35% for each, and 28% were undecided.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 41-44 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of Nursing Education |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2015 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Nursing(all)
- Education
- Medicine(all)
Cite this
Evaluation of embedded audio feedback on writing assignments. / Graves, Janet K.; Goodman, Joely T.; Hercinger, Maribeth; Minnich, Margo; Murcek, Christina M.; Parks, Jane M.; Shirley, Nancy.
In: Journal of Nursing Education, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2015, p. 41-44.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of embedded audio feedback on writing assignments
AU - Graves, Janet K.
AU - Goodman, Joely T.
AU - Hercinger, Maribeth
AU - Minnich, Margo
AU - Murcek, Christina M.
AU - Parks, Jane M.
AU - Shirley, Nancy
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - The purpose of this pilot study was to compare embedded audio feedback (EAF), which faculty provided using the iPad® application iAnnotate® PDF to insert audio comments and written feedback (WF), inserted electronically on student papers in a series of writing assignments. Goals included determining whether EAF provides more useful guidance to students than WF and whether EAF promotes connectedness among students and faculty. An additional goal was to ascertain the efficiency and acceptance of EAF as a grading tool by nursing faculty. The pilot study was a quasi-experimental, cross-over, posttest-only design. The project was completed in an Informatics in Health Care course. Faculty alternated the two feedback methods on four papers written by each student. Results of surveys and focus groups revealed that students and faculty had mixed feelings about this technology. Student preferences were equally divided between EAF and WF, with 35% for each, and 28% were undecided.
AB - The purpose of this pilot study was to compare embedded audio feedback (EAF), which faculty provided using the iPad® application iAnnotate® PDF to insert audio comments and written feedback (WF), inserted electronically on student papers in a series of writing assignments. Goals included determining whether EAF provides more useful guidance to students than WF and whether EAF promotes connectedness among students and faculty. An additional goal was to ascertain the efficiency and acceptance of EAF as a grading tool by nursing faculty. The pilot study was a quasi-experimental, cross-over, posttest-only design. The project was completed in an Informatics in Health Care course. Faculty alternated the two feedback methods on four papers written by each student. Results of surveys and focus groups revealed that students and faculty had mixed feelings about this technology. Student preferences were equally divided between EAF and WF, with 35% for each, and 28% were undecided.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928320804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928320804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3928/01484834-20141224-04
DO - 10.3928/01484834-20141224-04
M3 - Article
C2 - 25535759
AN - SCOPUS:84928320804
VL - 54
SP - 41
EP - 44
JO - Journal of Nursing Education
JF - Journal of Nursing Education
SN - 0148-4834
IS - 1
ER -