Evaluation of serial grey scale ultrasound scans in a gynecologic oncology clinic

Murray J. Casey, Kaye Little

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fifty women with primary malignant neoplasms of the ovary, fallopian tube, or uterus were examined and followed with serial grey scale ultrasound scans of the abdomen and pelvis during the course of their oncologic management. Assessment of the usefulness of this technique to the clinican indicates that in 66% of the cases, serial ultrasound studies were considered contributory, confirming the clinical impression or adding new information. Twenty percent of the ultrasound examinations were misleading, but did not adversely effect clinical management. These cases have been analyzed in detail; technical problems and pitfalls are discussed. It is concluded that ultrasonography can make a contribution in the follow-up of patients with gynecologic malignancies when carefully correlated with the clinical assessment, but certain patients may be unsuitable for scanning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)213-217
Number of pages5
JournalGynecologic Oncology
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1981
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fallopian Tube Neoplasms
Pelvis
Abdomen
Uterus
Ultrasonography
Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Evaluation of serial grey scale ultrasound scans in a gynecologic oncology clinic. / Casey, Murray J.; Little, Kaye.

In: Gynecologic Oncology, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1981, p. 213-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b59905f0646944499c5c7b4538d62f14,
title = "Evaluation of serial grey scale ultrasound scans in a gynecologic oncology clinic",
abstract = "Fifty women with primary malignant neoplasms of the ovary, fallopian tube, or uterus were examined and followed with serial grey scale ultrasound scans of the abdomen and pelvis during the course of their oncologic management. Assessment of the usefulness of this technique to the clinican indicates that in 66{\%} of the cases, serial ultrasound studies were considered contributory, confirming the clinical impression or adding new information. Twenty percent of the ultrasound examinations were misleading, but did not adversely effect clinical management. These cases have been analyzed in detail; technical problems and pitfalls are discussed. It is concluded that ultrasonography can make a contribution in the follow-up of patients with gynecologic malignancies when carefully correlated with the clinical assessment, but certain patients may be unsuitable for scanning.",
author = "Casey, {Murray J.} and Kaye Little",
year = "1981",
doi = "10.1016/S0090-8258(81)80011-X",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "213--217",
journal = "Gynecologic Oncology",
issn = "0090-8258",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of serial grey scale ultrasound scans in a gynecologic oncology clinic

AU - Casey, Murray J.

AU - Little, Kaye

PY - 1981

Y1 - 1981

N2 - Fifty women with primary malignant neoplasms of the ovary, fallopian tube, or uterus were examined and followed with serial grey scale ultrasound scans of the abdomen and pelvis during the course of their oncologic management. Assessment of the usefulness of this technique to the clinican indicates that in 66% of the cases, serial ultrasound studies were considered contributory, confirming the clinical impression or adding new information. Twenty percent of the ultrasound examinations were misleading, but did not adversely effect clinical management. These cases have been analyzed in detail; technical problems and pitfalls are discussed. It is concluded that ultrasonography can make a contribution in the follow-up of patients with gynecologic malignancies when carefully correlated with the clinical assessment, but certain patients may be unsuitable for scanning.

AB - Fifty women with primary malignant neoplasms of the ovary, fallopian tube, or uterus were examined and followed with serial grey scale ultrasound scans of the abdomen and pelvis during the course of their oncologic management. Assessment of the usefulness of this technique to the clinican indicates that in 66% of the cases, serial ultrasound studies were considered contributory, confirming the clinical impression or adding new information. Twenty percent of the ultrasound examinations were misleading, but did not adversely effect clinical management. These cases have been analyzed in detail; technical problems and pitfalls are discussed. It is concluded that ultrasonography can make a contribution in the follow-up of patients with gynecologic malignancies when carefully correlated with the clinical assessment, but certain patients may be unsuitable for scanning.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019454884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019454884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0090-8258(81)80011-X

DO - 10.1016/S0090-8258(81)80011-X

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 213

EP - 217

JO - Gynecologic Oncology

JF - Gynecologic Oncology

SN - 0090-8258

IS - 2

ER -