Experience with positron emission tomography (PET) scans in patients with ovarian cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our first year of experience in the use of PET scanning in the management of nine patients with ovarian cancer leads us to conclude that this promising new technique may be more sensitive than either serum CA-125 determinations or computed tomography for the detection and demonstration of residual or recurrent abdominal and pelvic tumor. Seven of these patients underwent second-look laparotomy which confirmed our impressions from preoperative PET scans in six patients, and the one other scan showed a focus of metabolic uptake coinciding with residual tumor in our retrospective review. The clinical courses of two other patients who did not undergo laparotomy confirmed the impressions gained from PET scans.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)331-338
Number of pages8
JournalGynecologic Oncology
Volume53
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Positron-Emission Tomography
Ovarian Neoplasms
Laparotomy
Residual Neoplasm
Tomography
Serum
Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Experience with positron emission tomography (PET) scans in patients with ovarian cancer. / Casey, Murray J.

In: Gynecologic Oncology, Vol. 53, No. 3, 1994, p. 331-338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{12a301c4581a46eb821df2db8081871e,
title = "Experience with positron emission tomography (PET) scans in patients with ovarian cancer",
abstract = "Our first year of experience in the use of PET scanning in the management of nine patients with ovarian cancer leads us to conclude that this promising new technique may be more sensitive than either serum CA-125 determinations or computed tomography for the detection and demonstration of residual or recurrent abdominal and pelvic tumor. Seven of these patients underwent second-look laparotomy which confirmed our impressions from preoperative PET scans in six patients, and the one other scan showed a focus of metabolic uptake coinciding with residual tumor in our retrospective review. The clinical courses of two other patients who did not undergo laparotomy confirmed the impressions gained from PET scans.",
author = "Casey, {Murray J.}",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1006/gyno.1994.1143",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "331--338",
journal = "Gynecologic Oncology",
issn = "0090-8258",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experience with positron emission tomography (PET) scans in patients with ovarian cancer

AU - Casey, Murray J.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Our first year of experience in the use of PET scanning in the management of nine patients with ovarian cancer leads us to conclude that this promising new technique may be more sensitive than either serum CA-125 determinations or computed tomography for the detection and demonstration of residual or recurrent abdominal and pelvic tumor. Seven of these patients underwent second-look laparotomy which confirmed our impressions from preoperative PET scans in six patients, and the one other scan showed a focus of metabolic uptake coinciding with residual tumor in our retrospective review. The clinical courses of two other patients who did not undergo laparotomy confirmed the impressions gained from PET scans.

AB - Our first year of experience in the use of PET scanning in the management of nine patients with ovarian cancer leads us to conclude that this promising new technique may be more sensitive than either serum CA-125 determinations or computed tomography for the detection and demonstration of residual or recurrent abdominal and pelvic tumor. Seven of these patients underwent second-look laparotomy which confirmed our impressions from preoperative PET scans in six patients, and the one other scan showed a focus of metabolic uptake coinciding with residual tumor in our retrospective review. The clinical courses of two other patients who did not undergo laparotomy confirmed the impressions gained from PET scans.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028321662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028321662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/gyno.1994.1143

DO - 10.1006/gyno.1994.1143

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 331

EP - 338

JO - Gynecologic Oncology

JF - Gynecologic Oncology

SN - 0090-8258

IS - 3

ER -