Expert practice in physical therapy

Gail Jensen, Jan Gwyer, Katherine F. Shepard, Laurita M. Hack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

228 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose. The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify the dimensions of clinical expertise in physical therapy practice across 4 clinical specialty areas: geriatrics, neurology, orthopedics, and pediatrics. Subjects. Subjects were 12 peer-designated expert physical therapists nominated by the leaders of the American Physical Therapy Association sections for geriatrics, neurology, orthopedics, and pediatrics. Methods. Guided by a grounded theory approach, a multiple case study research design was used, with each of the 4 investigators studying 3 therapists working in one clinical area. Data were obtained through nonparticipant observation, interviews, review of documents, and analysis of structured tasks. Videotapes made during selected therapist-patient treatment sessions were used as a stimulus for the expert therapist interviews. Data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed through the development of 12 case reports and 4 composite case studies, one for each specialty, area. Results. A theoretical model of expert practice in physical therapy was developed that included 4 dimensions: (1) a dynamic, multidimensional knowledge base that is patient-centered and evolves through therapist reflection, (2) a clinical reasoning process that is embedded in a collaborative, problem-solving venture with the patient, (3) a central focus on movement assessment linked to patient function, and (4) consistent virtues seen in caring and commitment to patients. Conclusion and Discussion. These findings build on previous research in physical therapy on expertise. The dimensions of expert practice in physical therapy have implications for physical therapy practice, education, and continued research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)28-52
Number of pages25
JournalPhysical Therapy
Volume80
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neurology
Geriatrics
Orthopedics
Therapeutics
Interviews
Pediatrics
Videotape Recording
Knowledge Bases
Physical Therapists
Research
Practice (Psychology)
Research Design
Theoretical Models
Research Personnel
Observation
Education
Grounded Theory

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Jensen, G., Gwyer, J., Shepard, K. F., & Hack, L. M. (2000). Expert practice in physical therapy. Physical Therapy, 80(1), 28-52.

Expert practice in physical therapy. / Jensen, Gail; Gwyer, Jan; Shepard, Katherine F.; Hack, Laurita M.

In: Physical Therapy, Vol. 80, No. 1, 01.2000, p. 28-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jensen, G, Gwyer, J, Shepard, KF & Hack, LM 2000, 'Expert practice in physical therapy', Physical Therapy, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 28-52.
Jensen G, Gwyer J, Shepard KF, Hack LM. Expert practice in physical therapy. Physical Therapy. 2000 Jan;80(1):28-52.
Jensen, Gail ; Gwyer, Jan ; Shepard, Katherine F. ; Hack, Laurita M. / Expert practice in physical therapy. In: Physical Therapy. 2000 ; Vol. 80, No. 1. pp. 28-52.
@article{3c7ecba18fa54deaa8d3431145f006ad,
title = "Expert practice in physical therapy",
abstract = "Background and Purpose. The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify the dimensions of clinical expertise in physical therapy practice across 4 clinical specialty areas: geriatrics, neurology, orthopedics, and pediatrics. Subjects. Subjects were 12 peer-designated expert physical therapists nominated by the leaders of the American Physical Therapy Association sections for geriatrics, neurology, orthopedics, and pediatrics. Methods. Guided by a grounded theory approach, a multiple case study research design was used, with each of the 4 investigators studying 3 therapists working in one clinical area. Data were obtained through nonparticipant observation, interviews, review of documents, and analysis of structured tasks. Videotapes made during selected therapist-patient treatment sessions were used as a stimulus for the expert therapist interviews. Data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed through the development of 12 case reports and 4 composite case studies, one for each specialty, area. Results. A theoretical model of expert practice in physical therapy was developed that included 4 dimensions: (1) a dynamic, multidimensional knowledge base that is patient-centered and evolves through therapist reflection, (2) a clinical reasoning process that is embedded in a collaborative, problem-solving venture with the patient, (3) a central focus on movement assessment linked to patient function, and (4) consistent virtues seen in caring and commitment to patients. Conclusion and Discussion. These findings build on previous research in physical therapy on expertise. The dimensions of expert practice in physical therapy have implications for physical therapy practice, education, and continued research.",
author = "Gail Jensen and Jan Gwyer and Shepard, {Katherine F.} and Hack, {Laurita M.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "28--52",
journal = "Physical Therapy",
issn = "0031-9023",
publisher = "American Physical Therapy Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expert practice in physical therapy

AU - Jensen, Gail

AU - Gwyer, Jan

AU - Shepard, Katherine F.

AU - Hack, Laurita M.

PY - 2000/1

Y1 - 2000/1

N2 - Background and Purpose. The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify the dimensions of clinical expertise in physical therapy practice across 4 clinical specialty areas: geriatrics, neurology, orthopedics, and pediatrics. Subjects. Subjects were 12 peer-designated expert physical therapists nominated by the leaders of the American Physical Therapy Association sections for geriatrics, neurology, orthopedics, and pediatrics. Methods. Guided by a grounded theory approach, a multiple case study research design was used, with each of the 4 investigators studying 3 therapists working in one clinical area. Data were obtained through nonparticipant observation, interviews, review of documents, and analysis of structured tasks. Videotapes made during selected therapist-patient treatment sessions were used as a stimulus for the expert therapist interviews. Data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed through the development of 12 case reports and 4 composite case studies, one for each specialty, area. Results. A theoretical model of expert practice in physical therapy was developed that included 4 dimensions: (1) a dynamic, multidimensional knowledge base that is patient-centered and evolves through therapist reflection, (2) a clinical reasoning process that is embedded in a collaborative, problem-solving venture with the patient, (3) a central focus on movement assessment linked to patient function, and (4) consistent virtues seen in caring and commitment to patients. Conclusion and Discussion. These findings build on previous research in physical therapy on expertise. The dimensions of expert practice in physical therapy have implications for physical therapy practice, education, and continued research.

AB - Background and Purpose. The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify the dimensions of clinical expertise in physical therapy practice across 4 clinical specialty areas: geriatrics, neurology, orthopedics, and pediatrics. Subjects. Subjects were 12 peer-designated expert physical therapists nominated by the leaders of the American Physical Therapy Association sections for geriatrics, neurology, orthopedics, and pediatrics. Methods. Guided by a grounded theory approach, a multiple case study research design was used, with each of the 4 investigators studying 3 therapists working in one clinical area. Data were obtained through nonparticipant observation, interviews, review of documents, and analysis of structured tasks. Videotapes made during selected therapist-patient treatment sessions were used as a stimulus for the expert therapist interviews. Data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed through the development of 12 case reports and 4 composite case studies, one for each specialty, area. Results. A theoretical model of expert practice in physical therapy was developed that included 4 dimensions: (1) a dynamic, multidimensional knowledge base that is patient-centered and evolves through therapist reflection, (2) a clinical reasoning process that is embedded in a collaborative, problem-solving venture with the patient, (3) a central focus on movement assessment linked to patient function, and (4) consistent virtues seen in caring and commitment to patients. Conclusion and Discussion. These findings build on previous research in physical therapy on expertise. The dimensions of expert practice in physical therapy have implications for physical therapy practice, education, and continued research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033958791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033958791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 80

SP - 28

EP - 52

JO - Physical Therapy

JF - Physical Therapy

SN - 0031-9023

IS - 1

ER -