Exploring how response distortion of personality measures affects individuals

Greg L. Stewart, Todd C. Darnold, Ryan D. Zimmerman, Laura Parks, Susan L. Dustin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We use a within-person research design to compare response distortion on personality test scores obtained in a simulated selection context with scores obtained in a condition without motivation to distort. Even after accounting for measurement error, rank order changes result in a significant number of individuals being selected based on their selection context scores who would not be selected based on their nonmotivated scores. Yet, many individuals who distort do not elevate their scores enough to move to the top of the distribution, which alleviates some concern about combining personality measures with top-down selection procedures that adopt a low selection ratio. Common correction methods failed to accurately detect individuals who distort, and the correction practice of partialling lie scale scores from personality traits inaccurately eliminated individuals who did not truly distort.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)622-628
Number of pages7
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume49
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2010

Fingerprint

Personality
Personality Tests
Motivation
Research Design

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Exploring how response distortion of personality measures affects individuals. / Stewart, Greg L.; Darnold, Todd C.; Zimmerman, Ryan D.; Parks, Laura; Dustin, Susan L.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 49, No. 6, 10.2010, p. 622-628.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stewart, Greg L. ; Darnold, Todd C. ; Zimmerman, Ryan D. ; Parks, Laura ; Dustin, Susan L. / Exploring how response distortion of personality measures affects individuals. In: Personality and Individual Differences. 2010 ; Vol. 49, No. 6. pp. 622-628.
@article{b579a7b3eeaa44a6b7bf5be76fd7539c,
title = "Exploring how response distortion of personality measures affects individuals",
abstract = "We use a within-person research design to compare response distortion on personality test scores obtained in a simulated selection context with scores obtained in a condition without motivation to distort. Even after accounting for measurement error, rank order changes result in a significant number of individuals being selected based on their selection context scores who would not be selected based on their nonmotivated scores. Yet, many individuals who distort do not elevate their scores enough to move to the top of the distribution, which alleviates some concern about combining personality measures with top-down selection procedures that adopt a low selection ratio. Common correction methods failed to accurately detect individuals who distort, and the correction practice of partialling lie scale scores from personality traits inaccurately eliminated individuals who did not truly distort.",
author = "Stewart, {Greg L.} and Darnold, {Todd C.} and Zimmerman, {Ryan D.} and Laura Parks and Dustin, {Susan L.}",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.035",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "622--628",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring how response distortion of personality measures affects individuals

AU - Stewart, Greg L.

AU - Darnold, Todd C.

AU - Zimmerman, Ryan D.

AU - Parks, Laura

AU - Dustin, Susan L.

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - We use a within-person research design to compare response distortion on personality test scores obtained in a simulated selection context with scores obtained in a condition without motivation to distort. Even after accounting for measurement error, rank order changes result in a significant number of individuals being selected based on their selection context scores who would not be selected based on their nonmotivated scores. Yet, many individuals who distort do not elevate their scores enough to move to the top of the distribution, which alleviates some concern about combining personality measures with top-down selection procedures that adopt a low selection ratio. Common correction methods failed to accurately detect individuals who distort, and the correction practice of partialling lie scale scores from personality traits inaccurately eliminated individuals who did not truly distort.

AB - We use a within-person research design to compare response distortion on personality test scores obtained in a simulated selection context with scores obtained in a condition without motivation to distort. Even after accounting for measurement error, rank order changes result in a significant number of individuals being selected based on their selection context scores who would not be selected based on their nonmotivated scores. Yet, many individuals who distort do not elevate their scores enough to move to the top of the distribution, which alleviates some concern about combining personality measures with top-down selection procedures that adopt a low selection ratio. Common correction methods failed to accurately detect individuals who distort, and the correction practice of partialling lie scale scores from personality traits inaccurately eliminated individuals who did not truly distort.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955049648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955049648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.035

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.035

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77955049648

VL - 49

SP - 622

EP - 628

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

IS - 6

ER -