Facework theory

Performing familial roles in everyday interactions

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The concept of face is of Chinese origin (see Ho, 1975), however, sociologist Erving Goffman (1955, 1967) was among the first in Western culture to articulate the theoretical perspective of facework. Goffman is perhaps best known for his foundational and award-winning book The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (1959), where he proposed a dramaturgical model of interactions in public. He argued that public interactions are a performance, much like that of actors on a stage. These public performances are in reaction to how others might perceive us in a given situation and have the primary goal of impression management, noting that people adapt their performances to a given audience or context. He furthered his dramaturgical metaphor by acknowledging that social actors also had a back stage area where they set aside their public role, could be private, and/or prepared for their next public performance. Additionally, Goffman acknowledged that these public performances are often done in a team. Just like actors in a stage production, people may work together to complete a performance as a group. For example, wait staff may support one other while serving customers in the front stage of a restaurant’s dining room and also complain about customers together back stage in the kitchen. Similarly, a family may put on a performance in a public setting such as church or a community event but let their guard down while at home by themselves. Although he laid out this metaphor for public interactions in The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (and the dramaturgical metaphor presented in this volume is arguably related to his ideas on facework theory), his treatise “On Facework” was where he specifically used the language most tied to facework theory that scholars use today. This article first appeared in 1955 and was republished as part of his volume called Interaction Ritual in 1967.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationEngaging Theories in Family Communication
Subtitle of host publicationMultiple Perspectives
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages132-141
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9781351790680
ISBN (Print)9781138700932
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Metaphor
Ego
interaction
performance
Restaurants
Ceremonial Behavior
metaphor
Language
everyday life
customer
social actor
Facework
Familial
Interaction
sociologist
religious behavior
church
staff
event
language

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

McBride, M. C. (2017). Facework theory: Performing familial roles in everyday interactions. In Engaging Theories in Family Communication: Multiple Perspectives (pp. 132-141). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204321

Facework theory : Performing familial roles in everyday interactions. / McBride, M. Chad.

Engaging Theories in Family Communication: Multiple Perspectives. Taylor and Francis, 2017. p. 132-141.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

McBride, MC 2017, Facework theory: Performing familial roles in everyday interactions. in Engaging Theories in Family Communication: Multiple Perspectives. Taylor and Francis, pp. 132-141. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204321
McBride MC. Facework theory: Performing familial roles in everyday interactions. In Engaging Theories in Family Communication: Multiple Perspectives. Taylor and Francis. 2017. p. 132-141 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204321
McBride, M. Chad. / Facework theory : Performing familial roles in everyday interactions. Engaging Theories in Family Communication: Multiple Perspectives. Taylor and Francis, 2017. pp. 132-141
@inbook{b32576672bae4651b86b451b4014d337,
title = "Facework theory: Performing familial roles in everyday interactions",
abstract = "The concept of face is of Chinese origin (see Ho, 1975), however, sociologist Erving Goffman (1955, 1967) was among the first in Western culture to articulate the theoretical perspective of facework. Goffman is perhaps best known for his foundational and award-winning book The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (1959), where he proposed a dramaturgical model of interactions in public. He argued that public interactions are a performance, much like that of actors on a stage. These public performances are in reaction to how others might perceive us in a given situation and have the primary goal of impression management, noting that people adapt their performances to a given audience or context. He furthered his dramaturgical metaphor by acknowledging that social actors also had a back stage area where they set aside their public role, could be private, and/or prepared for their next public performance. Additionally, Goffman acknowledged that these public performances are often done in a team. Just like actors in a stage production, people may work together to complete a performance as a group. For example, wait staff may support one other while serving customers in the front stage of a restaurant’s dining room and also complain about customers together back stage in the kitchen. Similarly, a family may put on a performance in a public setting such as church or a community event but let their guard down while at home by themselves. Although he laid out this metaphor for public interactions in The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (and the dramaturgical metaphor presented in this volume is arguably related to his ideas on facework theory), his treatise “On Facework” was where he specifically used the language most tied to facework theory that scholars use today. This article first appeared in 1955 and was republished as part of his volume called Interaction Ritual in 1967.",
author = "McBride, {M. Chad}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781315204321",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781138700932",
pages = "132--141",
booktitle = "Engaging Theories in Family Communication",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Facework theory

T2 - Performing familial roles in everyday interactions

AU - McBride, M. Chad

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - The concept of face is of Chinese origin (see Ho, 1975), however, sociologist Erving Goffman (1955, 1967) was among the first in Western culture to articulate the theoretical perspective of facework. Goffman is perhaps best known for his foundational and award-winning book The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (1959), where he proposed a dramaturgical model of interactions in public. He argued that public interactions are a performance, much like that of actors on a stage. These public performances are in reaction to how others might perceive us in a given situation and have the primary goal of impression management, noting that people adapt their performances to a given audience or context. He furthered his dramaturgical metaphor by acknowledging that social actors also had a back stage area where they set aside their public role, could be private, and/or prepared for their next public performance. Additionally, Goffman acknowledged that these public performances are often done in a team. Just like actors in a stage production, people may work together to complete a performance as a group. For example, wait staff may support one other while serving customers in the front stage of a restaurant’s dining room and also complain about customers together back stage in the kitchen. Similarly, a family may put on a performance in a public setting such as church or a community event but let their guard down while at home by themselves. Although he laid out this metaphor for public interactions in The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (and the dramaturgical metaphor presented in this volume is arguably related to his ideas on facework theory), his treatise “On Facework” was where he specifically used the language most tied to facework theory that scholars use today. This article first appeared in 1955 and was republished as part of his volume called Interaction Ritual in 1967.

AB - The concept of face is of Chinese origin (see Ho, 1975), however, sociologist Erving Goffman (1955, 1967) was among the first in Western culture to articulate the theoretical perspective of facework. Goffman is perhaps best known for his foundational and award-winning book The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (1959), where he proposed a dramaturgical model of interactions in public. He argued that public interactions are a performance, much like that of actors on a stage. These public performances are in reaction to how others might perceive us in a given situation and have the primary goal of impression management, noting that people adapt their performances to a given audience or context. He furthered his dramaturgical metaphor by acknowledging that social actors also had a back stage area where they set aside their public role, could be private, and/or prepared for their next public performance. Additionally, Goffman acknowledged that these public performances are often done in a team. Just like actors in a stage production, people may work together to complete a performance as a group. For example, wait staff may support one other while serving customers in the front stage of a restaurant’s dining room and also complain about customers together back stage in the kitchen. Similarly, a family may put on a performance in a public setting such as church or a community event but let their guard down while at home by themselves. Although he laid out this metaphor for public interactions in The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (and the dramaturgical metaphor presented in this volume is arguably related to his ideas on facework theory), his treatise “On Facework” was where he specifically used the language most tied to facework theory that scholars use today. This article first appeared in 1955 and was republished as part of his volume called Interaction Ritual in 1967.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045701575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045701575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315204321

DO - 10.4324/9781315204321

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138700932

SP - 132

EP - 141

BT - Engaging Theories in Family Communication

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -