Factors influencing the measurement of bioavailability, taking calcium as a model

R. P. Heaney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For non-metabolizable supplemental nutrients, bioavailability is effectively equivalent to absorbability. Methods for measuring absorbability (balance, pharmacokinetic, tracer, urine increment, evoked physiological responses, and in vitro) are briefly characterized and their utility compared. When intrinsic labeling of a source is possible, tracer methods are generally the most accurate and precise, as well as often the least expensive. Factors influencing the measured end points of the various methods are described briefly. These include source factors such as pharmaceutic formulation, subject factors such as mucosal mass and the need status of the absorbing subject, and co-ingested factors such as other foods or food constituents. Extensive experience has shown that absorbability is difficult to predict from knowledge of the chemistry of the source, or even from the results of in vitro testing. Hence direct measurement of absorbability is essential to assure regulators and the general public that the source delivers what it promises.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Nutrition
Volume131
Issue number4 SUPPL.
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Biological Availability
bioavailability
tracer techniques
drug formulations
Calcium
calcium
Food
physiological response
nutrient availability
pharmacokinetics
chemistry
urine
Pharmacokinetics
methodology
Urine
testing
Pharmaceutical Preparations
In Vitro Techniques

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Food Science
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Factors influencing the measurement of bioavailability, taking calcium as a model. / Heaney, R. P.

In: Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 131, No. 4 SUPPL., 2001.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1603cc883e3f4534a7264f6850489633,
title = "Factors influencing the measurement of bioavailability, taking calcium as a model",
abstract = "For non-metabolizable supplemental nutrients, bioavailability is effectively equivalent to absorbability. Methods for measuring absorbability (balance, pharmacokinetic, tracer, urine increment, evoked physiological responses, and in vitro) are briefly characterized and their utility compared. When intrinsic labeling of a source is possible, tracer methods are generally the most accurate and precise, as well as often the least expensive. Factors influencing the measured end points of the various methods are described briefly. These include source factors such as pharmaceutic formulation, subject factors such as mucosal mass and the need status of the absorbing subject, and co-ingested factors such as other foods or food constituents. Extensive experience has shown that absorbability is difficult to predict from knowledge of the chemistry of the source, or even from the results of in vitro testing. Hence direct measurement of absorbability is essential to assure regulators and the general public that the source delivers what it promises.",
author = "Heaney, {R. P.}",
year = "2001",
language = "English",
volume = "131",
journal = "Journal of Nutrition",
issn = "0022-3166",
publisher = "American Society for Nutrition",
number = "4 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors influencing the measurement of bioavailability, taking calcium as a model

AU - Heaney, R. P.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - For non-metabolizable supplemental nutrients, bioavailability is effectively equivalent to absorbability. Methods for measuring absorbability (balance, pharmacokinetic, tracer, urine increment, evoked physiological responses, and in vitro) are briefly characterized and their utility compared. When intrinsic labeling of a source is possible, tracer methods are generally the most accurate and precise, as well as often the least expensive. Factors influencing the measured end points of the various methods are described briefly. These include source factors such as pharmaceutic formulation, subject factors such as mucosal mass and the need status of the absorbing subject, and co-ingested factors such as other foods or food constituents. Extensive experience has shown that absorbability is difficult to predict from knowledge of the chemistry of the source, or even from the results of in vitro testing. Hence direct measurement of absorbability is essential to assure regulators and the general public that the source delivers what it promises.

AB - For non-metabolizable supplemental nutrients, bioavailability is effectively equivalent to absorbability. Methods for measuring absorbability (balance, pharmacokinetic, tracer, urine increment, evoked physiological responses, and in vitro) are briefly characterized and their utility compared. When intrinsic labeling of a source is possible, tracer methods are generally the most accurate and precise, as well as often the least expensive. Factors influencing the measured end points of the various methods are described briefly. These include source factors such as pharmaceutic formulation, subject factors such as mucosal mass and the need status of the absorbing subject, and co-ingested factors such as other foods or food constituents. Extensive experience has shown that absorbability is difficult to predict from knowledge of the chemistry of the source, or even from the results of in vitro testing. Hence direct measurement of absorbability is essential to assure regulators and the general public that the source delivers what it promises.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035065530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035065530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11285351

AN - SCOPUS:0035065530

VL - 131

JO - Journal of Nutrition

JF - Journal of Nutrition

SN - 0022-3166

IS - 4 SUPPL.

ER -