Faculty workload comparison between a campus-based and internet-based patient assessment course

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. To compare instructor workload between a required campus-based and an Internet-based patient assessment course and to identify the sources of the workload. Methods. Instructor workload was measured for each pathway by documenting the total time required throughout the semester to teach and maintain the course. Specific workload items that were measured included lectures, administering examinations, e-mail communications, discussion boards, phone conversations, and office visits. Results. The Internet-based course (n=45 students) resulted in a 23% increase in total instructor workload for the semester and a 192% increase in instructor workload per student compared to the campus-based course (n=107). The majority of the additional work involved with the Internet-based course came from receiving and sending e-mail, while workload from the campus-based course primarily came from in-class lectures. Conclusions. Faculty member workload was higher in the Internet-based course compared to the campus-based course. Similar studies on other courses should be conducted to determine if these results are course specific.

Original languageEnglish
Article number67
Pages (from-to)495-499
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Volume69
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Workload
Internet
workload
instructor
Postal Service
e-mail
Communication Aids for Disabled
semester
Students
Office Visits
communications
conversation
student
examination

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pharmacology
  • Education

Cite this

@article{5e88dddcbdf94a87b8028391085c91b7,
title = "Faculty workload comparison between a campus-based and internet-based patient assessment course",
abstract = "Objectives. To compare instructor workload between a required campus-based and an Internet-based patient assessment course and to identify the sources of the workload. Methods. Instructor workload was measured for each pathway by documenting the total time required throughout the semester to teach and maintain the course. Specific workload items that were measured included lectures, administering examinations, e-mail communications, discussion boards, phone conversations, and office visits. Results. The Internet-based course (n=45 students) resulted in a 23{\%} increase in total instructor workload for the semester and a 192{\%} increase in instructor workload per student compared to the campus-based course (n=107). The majority of the additional work involved with the Internet-based course came from receiving and sending e-mail, while workload from the campus-based course primarily came from in-class lectures. Conclusions. Faculty member workload was higher in the Internet-based course compared to the campus-based course. Similar studies on other courses should be conducted to determine if these results are course specific.",
author = "Lenz, {Thomas L.} and Jones, {Rhonda M.} and Monaghan, {Michael S.}",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "495--499",
journal = "American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education",
issn = "0002-9459",
publisher = "American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Faculty workload comparison between a campus-based and internet-based patient assessment course

AU - Lenz, Thomas L.

AU - Jones, Rhonda M.

AU - Monaghan, Michael S.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Objectives. To compare instructor workload between a required campus-based and an Internet-based patient assessment course and to identify the sources of the workload. Methods. Instructor workload was measured for each pathway by documenting the total time required throughout the semester to teach and maintain the course. Specific workload items that were measured included lectures, administering examinations, e-mail communications, discussion boards, phone conversations, and office visits. Results. The Internet-based course (n=45 students) resulted in a 23% increase in total instructor workload for the semester and a 192% increase in instructor workload per student compared to the campus-based course (n=107). The majority of the additional work involved with the Internet-based course came from receiving and sending e-mail, while workload from the campus-based course primarily came from in-class lectures. Conclusions. Faculty member workload was higher in the Internet-based course compared to the campus-based course. Similar studies on other courses should be conducted to determine if these results are course specific.

AB - Objectives. To compare instructor workload between a required campus-based and an Internet-based patient assessment course and to identify the sources of the workload. Methods. Instructor workload was measured for each pathway by documenting the total time required throughout the semester to teach and maintain the course. Specific workload items that were measured included lectures, administering examinations, e-mail communications, discussion boards, phone conversations, and office visits. Results. The Internet-based course (n=45 students) resulted in a 23% increase in total instructor workload for the semester and a 192% increase in instructor workload per student compared to the campus-based course (n=107). The majority of the additional work involved with the Internet-based course came from receiving and sending e-mail, while workload from the campus-based course primarily came from in-class lectures. Conclusions. Faculty member workload was higher in the Internet-based course compared to the campus-based course. Similar studies on other courses should be conducted to determine if these results are course specific.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27744467740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27744467740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 495

EP - 499

JO - American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

JF - American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

SN - 0002-9459

IS - 4

M1 - 67

ER -