Fewer and better children

Race, class, religion, and birth control reform in America

Melissa J. Wilde, Sabrina Danielsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the early 20th century, contraceptives were illegal and, for many, especially religious groups, taboo. But, in the span of just two years, between 1929 and 1931, many of the United States’ most prominent religious groups pronounced contraceptives to be moral and began advocating for the laws restricting them to be repealed. Met with everything from support, to silence, to outright condemnation by other religious groups, these pronouncements and the debates they caused divided the American religious field by an issue of sex and gender for the first time. This article explains why America’s religious groups took the positions they did at this crucial moment in history. In doing so, it demonstrates that the politics of sex and gender that divide American religion today is deeply rooted in century-old inequalities of race and class.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1710-1760
Number of pages51
JournalAmerican Journal of Sociology
Volume119
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

religious group
family planning
Religion
reform
contraceptive
gender
Law
politics
history

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Fewer and better children : Race, class, religion, and birth control reform in America. / Wilde, Melissa J.; Danielsen, Sabrina.

In: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 119, No. 6, 01.01.2014, p. 1710-1760.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8dc77825961f4b1491fcc7a2bf6c5457,
title = "Fewer and better children: Race, class, religion, and birth control reform in America",
abstract = "In the early 20th century, contraceptives were illegal and, for many, especially religious groups, taboo. But, in the span of just two years, between 1929 and 1931, many of the United States’ most prominent religious groups pronounced contraceptives to be moral and began advocating for the laws restricting them to be repealed. Met with everything from support, to silence, to outright condemnation by other religious groups, these pronouncements and the debates they caused divided the American religious field by an issue of sex and gender for the first time. This article explains why America’s religious groups took the positions they did at this crucial moment in history. In doing so, it demonstrates that the politics of sex and gender that divide American religion today is deeply rooted in century-old inequalities of race and class.",
author = "Wilde, {Melissa J.} and Sabrina Danielsen",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/674007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "119",
pages = "1710--1760",
journal = "American Journal of Sociology",
issn = "0002-9602",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fewer and better children

T2 - Race, class, religion, and birth control reform in America

AU - Wilde, Melissa J.

AU - Danielsen, Sabrina

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - In the early 20th century, contraceptives were illegal and, for many, especially religious groups, taboo. But, in the span of just two years, between 1929 and 1931, many of the United States’ most prominent religious groups pronounced contraceptives to be moral and began advocating for the laws restricting them to be repealed. Met with everything from support, to silence, to outright condemnation by other religious groups, these pronouncements and the debates they caused divided the American religious field by an issue of sex and gender for the first time. This article explains why America’s religious groups took the positions they did at this crucial moment in history. In doing so, it demonstrates that the politics of sex and gender that divide American religion today is deeply rooted in century-old inequalities of race and class.

AB - In the early 20th century, contraceptives were illegal and, for many, especially religious groups, taboo. But, in the span of just two years, between 1929 and 1931, many of the United States’ most prominent religious groups pronounced contraceptives to be moral and began advocating for the laws restricting them to be repealed. Met with everything from support, to silence, to outright condemnation by other religious groups, these pronouncements and the debates they caused divided the American religious field by an issue of sex and gender for the first time. This article explains why America’s religious groups took the positions they did at this crucial moment in history. In doing so, it demonstrates that the politics of sex and gender that divide American religion today is deeply rooted in century-old inequalities of race and class.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907790397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907790397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/674007

DO - 10.1086/674007

M3 - Article

VL - 119

SP - 1710

EP - 1760

JO - American Journal of Sociology

JF - American Journal of Sociology

SN - 0002-9602

IS - 6

ER -