Global leaders’ perceptions of elements required for effective leadership development in the twenty-first century

Rob Elkington, Noel James Pearse, Jennifer Moss Breen, Madeleine Van der Steege, Suzanne Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop a clear answer to the question “how is leadership developed?” This research utilized the knowledge of leadership development experts and their collective expertise to identify the critical elements required for a high-quality leadership development program. Design/methodology/approach: The Lockean Inquiring System approach to the Delphi technique was used to solicit the views of experts in leadership and leadership development from around the world. Experts for Round 1 of the Delphi were drawn from a random sampling of 100 people, comprising leadership researchers, coaches, and organizational leaders, not personally known to the lead researcher of this project, but in his LinkedIn network. A response rate of 13 percent (n=13) yielded a rich range of qualitative data. Responses from the first round of the Delphi were analyzed using open coding and categorized into four themes, representing four sets of competencies required of leaders. Findings: The four themes were labeled as contextual, human capital, social capital, and structural capital, all of which were seen by participants as being central to the development of collective leadership. Based on these themes, this paper identifies a useful list of key leadership development tactics from which those wishing to develop a leadership program can work. Research limitations/implications: As the first round of a Delphi study, the authors are limited to presenting only the key elementary empirical judgments. Subsequent study with an expanded sample size and a refined set of questions rooted in the current data will contribute further to the development of factual propositions related to leadership development for the twenty-first century. The Delphi survey is a “snapshot” approach and presents a holographic-type image of the complex whole. The authors plan to triangulate the data by significantly expanding the pool of Delphi experts and conducting the Round 1 survey a second time with a larger international group of respondents that fit the criteria of expert. Practical implications: This paper presents four dimensions of an effective leadership development strategy. Originality/value: Core elements of the best methods for leadership development have been identified by leadership development experts, which serve as a basis for developing leadership as a collective, and for further research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1038-1056
Number of pages19
JournalLeadership and Organization Development Journal
Volume38
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Effective leadership
Leadership development
Delphi
Expertise
Coach
Development strategy
Tactics
Response rate
Systems approach
Social capital
Qualitative data
Sample size
Structural capital
Delphi study
Random sampling
Core values
Competency
Design methodology
Delphi technique
Human capital

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Global leaders’ perceptions of elements required for effective leadership development in the twenty-first century. / Elkington, Rob; Pearse, Noel James; Moss Breen, Jennifer; Van der Steege, Madeleine; Martin, Suzanne.

In: Leadership and Organization Development Journal, Vol. 38, No. 8, 2017, p. 1038-1056.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Elkington, Rob ; Pearse, Noel James ; Moss Breen, Jennifer ; Van der Steege, Madeleine ; Martin, Suzanne. / Global leaders’ perceptions of elements required for effective leadership development in the twenty-first century. In: Leadership and Organization Development Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 38, No. 8. pp. 1038-1056.
@article{dc76050d49674a628dc4df071eabb403,
title = "Global leaders’ perceptions of elements required for effective leadership development in the twenty-first century",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop a clear answer to the question “how is leadership developed?” This research utilized the knowledge of leadership development experts and their collective expertise to identify the critical elements required for a high-quality leadership development program. Design/methodology/approach: The Lockean Inquiring System approach to the Delphi technique was used to solicit the views of experts in leadership and leadership development from around the world. Experts for Round 1 of the Delphi were drawn from a random sampling of 100 people, comprising leadership researchers, coaches, and organizational leaders, not personally known to the lead researcher of this project, but in his LinkedIn network. A response rate of 13 percent (n=13) yielded a rich range of qualitative data. Responses from the first round of the Delphi were analyzed using open coding and categorized into four themes, representing four sets of competencies required of leaders. Findings: The four themes were labeled as contextual, human capital, social capital, and structural capital, all of which were seen by participants as being central to the development of collective leadership. Based on these themes, this paper identifies a useful list of key leadership development tactics from which those wishing to develop a leadership program can work. Research limitations/implications: As the first round of a Delphi study, the authors are limited to presenting only the key elementary empirical judgments. Subsequent study with an expanded sample size and a refined set of questions rooted in the current data will contribute further to the development of factual propositions related to leadership development for the twenty-first century. The Delphi survey is a “snapshot” approach and presents a holographic-type image of the complex whole. The authors plan to triangulate the data by significantly expanding the pool of Delphi experts and conducting the Round 1 survey a second time with a larger international group of respondents that fit the criteria of expert. Practical implications: This paper presents four dimensions of an effective leadership development strategy. Originality/value: Core elements of the best methods for leadership development have been identified by leadership development experts, which serve as a basis for developing leadership as a collective, and for further research.",
author = "Rob Elkington and Pearse, {Noel James} and {Moss Breen}, Jennifer and {Van der Steege}, Madeleine and Suzanne Martin",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1108/LODJ-06-2016-0145",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "1038--1056",
journal = "Leadership and Organization Development Journal",
issn = "0143-7739",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Global leaders’ perceptions of elements required for effective leadership development in the twenty-first century

AU - Elkington, Rob

AU - Pearse, Noel James

AU - Moss Breen, Jennifer

AU - Van der Steege, Madeleine

AU - Martin, Suzanne

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop a clear answer to the question “how is leadership developed?” This research utilized the knowledge of leadership development experts and their collective expertise to identify the critical elements required for a high-quality leadership development program. Design/methodology/approach: The Lockean Inquiring System approach to the Delphi technique was used to solicit the views of experts in leadership and leadership development from around the world. Experts for Round 1 of the Delphi were drawn from a random sampling of 100 people, comprising leadership researchers, coaches, and organizational leaders, not personally known to the lead researcher of this project, but in his LinkedIn network. A response rate of 13 percent (n=13) yielded a rich range of qualitative data. Responses from the first round of the Delphi were analyzed using open coding and categorized into four themes, representing four sets of competencies required of leaders. Findings: The four themes were labeled as contextual, human capital, social capital, and structural capital, all of which were seen by participants as being central to the development of collective leadership. Based on these themes, this paper identifies a useful list of key leadership development tactics from which those wishing to develop a leadership program can work. Research limitations/implications: As the first round of a Delphi study, the authors are limited to presenting only the key elementary empirical judgments. Subsequent study with an expanded sample size and a refined set of questions rooted in the current data will contribute further to the development of factual propositions related to leadership development for the twenty-first century. The Delphi survey is a “snapshot” approach and presents a holographic-type image of the complex whole. The authors plan to triangulate the data by significantly expanding the pool of Delphi experts and conducting the Round 1 survey a second time with a larger international group of respondents that fit the criteria of expert. Practical implications: This paper presents four dimensions of an effective leadership development strategy. Originality/value: Core elements of the best methods for leadership development have been identified by leadership development experts, which serve as a basis for developing leadership as a collective, and for further research.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop a clear answer to the question “how is leadership developed?” This research utilized the knowledge of leadership development experts and their collective expertise to identify the critical elements required for a high-quality leadership development program. Design/methodology/approach: The Lockean Inquiring System approach to the Delphi technique was used to solicit the views of experts in leadership and leadership development from around the world. Experts for Round 1 of the Delphi were drawn from a random sampling of 100 people, comprising leadership researchers, coaches, and organizational leaders, not personally known to the lead researcher of this project, but in his LinkedIn network. A response rate of 13 percent (n=13) yielded a rich range of qualitative data. Responses from the first round of the Delphi were analyzed using open coding and categorized into four themes, representing four sets of competencies required of leaders. Findings: The four themes were labeled as contextual, human capital, social capital, and structural capital, all of which were seen by participants as being central to the development of collective leadership. Based on these themes, this paper identifies a useful list of key leadership development tactics from which those wishing to develop a leadership program can work. Research limitations/implications: As the first round of a Delphi study, the authors are limited to presenting only the key elementary empirical judgments. Subsequent study with an expanded sample size and a refined set of questions rooted in the current data will contribute further to the development of factual propositions related to leadership development for the twenty-first century. The Delphi survey is a “snapshot” approach and presents a holographic-type image of the complex whole. The authors plan to triangulate the data by significantly expanding the pool of Delphi experts and conducting the Round 1 survey a second time with a larger international group of respondents that fit the criteria of expert. Practical implications: This paper presents four dimensions of an effective leadership development strategy. Originality/value: Core elements of the best methods for leadership development have been identified by leadership development experts, which serve as a basis for developing leadership as a collective, and for further research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031128512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031128512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/LODJ-06-2016-0145

DO - 10.1108/LODJ-06-2016-0145

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 1038

EP - 1056

JO - Leadership and Organization Development Journal

JF - Leadership and Organization Development Journal

SN - 0143-7739

IS - 8

ER -