Heller myotomy is superior to dilatation for the treatment of early achalasia

Marco Anselmino, Galen Perdikis, Ronald A. Hinder, Paul V. Polishuk, Paul Wilson, John D. Terry, Stephen J. Lanspa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To study the pretreatment characteristics that predispose a patient to rupture and to compare the outcome after dilatation with the outcome after surgical myotomy. Design: A survey of all patients treated for achalasia at the Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Neb, during a 16-year period. Clinical examination and testing of consenting patients at 12 months and longer after treatment. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Of the 61 patients, 55 were treated with dilatation. Esophageal rupture developed in 8 patients (14.5%) with achalasia after pneumatic dilataion; these patients underwent surgery for the rupture. Dilatation failed in 8 other patients; these patients underwent a surgical myotomy. Six patients underwent a primary surgical myotomy. Main Outcome Measures: Duration of symptoms, weigth loss, lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure and relaxation, amplitude and quality of distal esophageal contractions (assessed by manometry), 24-hour esophageal pH, and maximal esophageal diameter (assessed by barium swallow examination). Results: Surgical myotomy at a mean (±SEM) of 44.9±18.6 months alleviated dysphagia in 13 (93%) of the 14 patients compared with only 12 (39%) of the 31 patients after dilation at a mean (±SEM) of 55.0±11.7 months (P

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-240
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume132
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Esophageal Achalasia
Dilatation
Therapeutics
Rupture
Lower Esophageal Sphincter
Manometry
Barium
Deglutition
Deglutition Disorders
Tertiary Care Centers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Anselmino, M., Perdikis, G., Hinder, R. A., Polishuk, P. V., Wilson, P., Terry, J. D., & Lanspa, S. J. (1997). Heller myotomy is superior to dilatation for the treatment of early achalasia. Archives of Surgery, 132(3), 233-240.

Heller myotomy is superior to dilatation for the treatment of early achalasia. / Anselmino, Marco; Perdikis, Galen; Hinder, Ronald A.; Polishuk, Paul V.; Wilson, Paul; Terry, John D.; Lanspa, Stephen J.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 132, No. 3, 1997, p. 233-240.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Anselmino, M, Perdikis, G, Hinder, RA, Polishuk, PV, Wilson, P, Terry, JD & Lanspa, SJ 1997, 'Heller myotomy is superior to dilatation for the treatment of early achalasia', Archives of Surgery, vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 233-240.
Anselmino M, Perdikis G, Hinder RA, Polishuk PV, Wilson P, Terry JD et al. Heller myotomy is superior to dilatation for the treatment of early achalasia. Archives of Surgery. 1997;132(3):233-240.
Anselmino, Marco ; Perdikis, Galen ; Hinder, Ronald A. ; Polishuk, Paul V. ; Wilson, Paul ; Terry, John D. ; Lanspa, Stephen J. / Heller myotomy is superior to dilatation for the treatment of early achalasia. In: Archives of Surgery. 1997 ; Vol. 132, No. 3. pp. 233-240.
@article{30e40d849607464d8e0beed102cbf04d,
title = "Heller myotomy is superior to dilatation for the treatment of early achalasia",
abstract = "Objectives: To study the pretreatment characteristics that predispose a patient to rupture and to compare the outcome after dilatation with the outcome after surgical myotomy. Design: A survey of all patients treated for achalasia at the Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Neb, during a 16-year period. Clinical examination and testing of consenting patients at 12 months and longer after treatment. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Of the 61 patients, 55 were treated with dilatation. Esophageal rupture developed in 8 patients (14.5{\%}) with achalasia after pneumatic dilataion; these patients underwent surgery for the rupture. Dilatation failed in 8 other patients; these patients underwent a surgical myotomy. Six patients underwent a primary surgical myotomy. Main Outcome Measures: Duration of symptoms, weigth loss, lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure and relaxation, amplitude and quality of distal esophageal contractions (assessed by manometry), 24-hour esophageal pH, and maximal esophageal diameter (assessed by barium swallow examination). Results: Surgical myotomy at a mean (±SEM) of 44.9±18.6 months alleviated dysphagia in 13 (93{\%}) of the 14 patients compared with only 12 (39{\%}) of the 31 patients after dilation at a mean (±SEM) of 55.0±11.7 months (P",
author = "Marco Anselmino and Galen Perdikis and Hinder, {Ronald A.} and Polishuk, {Paul V.} and Paul Wilson and Terry, {John D.} and Lanspa, {Stephen J.}",
year = "1997",
language = "English",
volume = "132",
pages = "233--240",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Heller myotomy is superior to dilatation for the treatment of early achalasia

AU - Anselmino, Marco

AU - Perdikis, Galen

AU - Hinder, Ronald A.

AU - Polishuk, Paul V.

AU - Wilson, Paul

AU - Terry, John D.

AU - Lanspa, Stephen J.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Objectives: To study the pretreatment characteristics that predispose a patient to rupture and to compare the outcome after dilatation with the outcome after surgical myotomy. Design: A survey of all patients treated for achalasia at the Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Neb, during a 16-year period. Clinical examination and testing of consenting patients at 12 months and longer after treatment. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Of the 61 patients, 55 were treated with dilatation. Esophageal rupture developed in 8 patients (14.5%) with achalasia after pneumatic dilataion; these patients underwent surgery for the rupture. Dilatation failed in 8 other patients; these patients underwent a surgical myotomy. Six patients underwent a primary surgical myotomy. Main Outcome Measures: Duration of symptoms, weigth loss, lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure and relaxation, amplitude and quality of distal esophageal contractions (assessed by manometry), 24-hour esophageal pH, and maximal esophageal diameter (assessed by barium swallow examination). Results: Surgical myotomy at a mean (±SEM) of 44.9±18.6 months alleviated dysphagia in 13 (93%) of the 14 patients compared with only 12 (39%) of the 31 patients after dilation at a mean (±SEM) of 55.0±11.7 months (P

AB - Objectives: To study the pretreatment characteristics that predispose a patient to rupture and to compare the outcome after dilatation with the outcome after surgical myotomy. Design: A survey of all patients treated for achalasia at the Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Neb, during a 16-year period. Clinical examination and testing of consenting patients at 12 months and longer after treatment. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Of the 61 patients, 55 were treated with dilatation. Esophageal rupture developed in 8 patients (14.5%) with achalasia after pneumatic dilataion; these patients underwent surgery for the rupture. Dilatation failed in 8 other patients; these patients underwent a surgical myotomy. Six patients underwent a primary surgical myotomy. Main Outcome Measures: Duration of symptoms, weigth loss, lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure and relaxation, amplitude and quality of distal esophageal contractions (assessed by manometry), 24-hour esophageal pH, and maximal esophageal diameter (assessed by barium swallow examination). Results: Surgical myotomy at a mean (±SEM) of 44.9±18.6 months alleviated dysphagia in 13 (93%) of the 14 patients compared with only 12 (39%) of the 31 patients after dilation at a mean (±SEM) of 55.0±11.7 months (P

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030938571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030938571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9125019

AN - SCOPUS:0030938571

VL - 132

SP - 233

EP - 240

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 3

ER -