Instructor workload of a campus-based versus a web-based pharmacy course

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Instructor workload and workload sources were compared between an elective campus-based and web-based pharmacy course. Instructor workload was measured for each pathway by documenting the total time required throughout the semester to teach, maintain and evaluate the course. Specific workload items that were measured included: in-class activities, e-mail communications, discussion boards, office visits and grading term-papers and examinations. The web-based students (n = 1.6) required a 5.4% increase in total workload for the semester and nearly 28 minutes of additional workload per student compared to campus-based students (n = 25). The majority of workload involved with the web-based course came from receiving and sending e-mail while workload from the campus-based course primarily came from in-class activities. Faculty workload was higher in the web-based course versus the campus-based course. Similar studies should be conducted on other courses to determine if these results are generalizable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-106
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Pharmacy Teaching
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 4 2006

Fingerprint

workload
instructor
e-mail
semester
student
grading
communications
examination

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

Instructor workload of a campus-based versus a web-based pharmacy course. / Lenz, Thomas L.

In: Journal of Pharmacy Teaching, Vol. 12, No. 2, 04.04.2006, p. 97-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c5ad248d6e3544f49ecb740c5006d0ba,
title = "Instructor workload of a campus-based versus a web-based pharmacy course",
abstract = "Instructor workload and workload sources were compared between an elective campus-based and web-based pharmacy course. Instructor workload was measured for each pathway by documenting the total time required throughout the semester to teach, maintain and evaluate the course. Specific workload items that were measured included: in-class activities, e-mail communications, discussion boards, office visits and grading term-papers and examinations. The web-based students (n = 1.6) required a 5.4{\%} increase in total workload for the semester and nearly 28 minutes of additional workload per student compared to campus-based students (n = 25). The majority of workload involved with the web-based course came from receiving and sending e-mail while workload from the campus-based course primarily came from in-class activities. Faculty workload was higher in the web-based course versus the campus-based course. Similar studies should be conducted on other courses to determine if these results are generalizable.",
author = "Lenz, {Thomas L.}",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1300/J060v12n02_07",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "97--106",
journal = "Journal of Pharmacy Teaching",
issn = "1044-0054",
publisher = "Haworth Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Instructor workload of a campus-based versus a web-based pharmacy course

AU - Lenz, Thomas L.

PY - 2006/4/4

Y1 - 2006/4/4

N2 - Instructor workload and workload sources were compared between an elective campus-based and web-based pharmacy course. Instructor workload was measured for each pathway by documenting the total time required throughout the semester to teach, maintain and evaluate the course. Specific workload items that were measured included: in-class activities, e-mail communications, discussion boards, office visits and grading term-papers and examinations. The web-based students (n = 1.6) required a 5.4% increase in total workload for the semester and nearly 28 minutes of additional workload per student compared to campus-based students (n = 25). The majority of workload involved with the web-based course came from receiving and sending e-mail while workload from the campus-based course primarily came from in-class activities. Faculty workload was higher in the web-based course versus the campus-based course. Similar studies should be conducted on other courses to determine if these results are generalizable.

AB - Instructor workload and workload sources were compared between an elective campus-based and web-based pharmacy course. Instructor workload was measured for each pathway by documenting the total time required throughout the semester to teach, maintain and evaluate the course. Specific workload items that were measured included: in-class activities, e-mail communications, discussion boards, office visits and grading term-papers and examinations. The web-based students (n = 1.6) required a 5.4% increase in total workload for the semester and nearly 28 minutes of additional workload per student compared to campus-based students (n = 25). The majority of workload involved with the web-based course came from receiving and sending e-mail while workload from the campus-based course primarily came from in-class activities. Faculty workload was higher in the web-based course versus the campus-based course. Similar studies should be conducted on other courses to determine if these results are generalizable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746651528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746651528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J060v12n02_07

DO - 10.1300/J060v12n02_07

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 97

EP - 106

JO - Journal of Pharmacy Teaching

JF - Journal of Pharmacy Teaching

SN - 1044-0054

IS - 2

ER -