Inter-centre comparison of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for the typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

B. D. Cookson, P. Aparicio, Ariane Deplano, Marc Struelens, R. Goering, R. Marples

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

71 Scopus citations

Abstract

The results of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of chromosomal DNA of the same 12 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains of diverse geographical origin, performed in three different laboratories were compared; one laboratory used field-inversion gel electrophoresis (FIGE), one used contour clamped homogeneous electrophoresis (CHEF) and one used both (all manufactured by BioRad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). No single method produced the maximum number of chromosomal fragments from all isolates. In only four instances were the same number of fragments identified by any two techniques. Although there were similar trends in strain identification the results showed many discrepancies even with a three-band difference rule to discriminate between strains. Plasmids in seven of the isolates produced a fragment, but this did not affect discrimination of the study isolates. There is a great need to standardise methodology and produce a standard set of strains to assist in this process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-184
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Medical Microbiology
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

    Fingerprint

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Microbiology
  • Microbiology (medical)

Cite this