Ionic conduction in solids

Comparing conductivity and modulus representations with regard to scaling properties

David L. Sidebottom, B. Roling, K. Funke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

138 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the literature, the electric modulus representation has been used to provide comparative analysis of the ion transport properties in different ion-conducting materials. In this paper we show that the modulus representation is not a suitable tool for such purposes. Our arguments derive from an examination of the scaling properties of both the ac conductivity σ*(ν) and the modulus M*(ν) which demonstrates how scaling that is inherent in σ*(ν) is lost in M*(ν) by inclusion of the high frequency permittivity ε′(∞), the latter quantity being unrelated to ion transport processes. Furthermore, we show how highly regarded shape changes of the modulus that occur with varying ion concentration are merely a manifestation of including ε′(∞) in the definition of M*(ν). We conclude then that the electric modulus formalism has resulted in misleading interpretations of the ion dynamics and, hence, should be discouraged.

Original languageEnglish
Article number024301
Pages (from-to)243011-243017
Number of pages7
JournalPhysical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics
Volume63
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Ionic conduction in solids
Ions
scaling
conduction
conductivity
ions
ion concentration
examination
transport properties
Transport properties
inclusions
permittivity
formalism
Permittivity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Condensed Matter Physics

Cite this

Ionic conduction in solids : Comparing conductivity and modulus representations with regard to scaling properties. / Sidebottom, David L.; Roling, B.; Funke, K.

In: Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, Vol. 63, No. 2, 024301, 2001, p. 243011-243017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{09045ffeb9a34b698a98baceccaa58c7,
title = "Ionic conduction in solids: Comparing conductivity and modulus representations with regard to scaling properties",
abstract = "In the literature, the electric modulus representation has been used to provide comparative analysis of the ion transport properties in different ion-conducting materials. In this paper we show that the modulus representation is not a suitable tool for such purposes. Our arguments derive from an examination of the scaling properties of both the ac conductivity σ*(ν) and the modulus M*(ν) which demonstrates how scaling that is inherent in σ*(ν) is lost in M*(ν) by inclusion of the high frequency permittivity ε′(∞), the latter quantity being unrelated to ion transport processes. Furthermore, we show how highly regarded shape changes of the modulus that occur with varying ion concentration are merely a manifestation of including ε′(∞) in the definition of M*(ν). We conclude then that the electric modulus formalism has resulted in misleading interpretations of the ion dynamics and, hence, should be discouraged.",
author = "Sidebottom, {David L.} and B. Roling and K. Funke",
year = "2001",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "243011--243017",
journal = "Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics",
issn = "1098-0121",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ionic conduction in solids

T2 - Comparing conductivity and modulus representations with regard to scaling properties

AU - Sidebottom, David L.

AU - Roling, B.

AU - Funke, K.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - In the literature, the electric modulus representation has been used to provide comparative analysis of the ion transport properties in different ion-conducting materials. In this paper we show that the modulus representation is not a suitable tool for such purposes. Our arguments derive from an examination of the scaling properties of both the ac conductivity σ*(ν) and the modulus M*(ν) which demonstrates how scaling that is inherent in σ*(ν) is lost in M*(ν) by inclusion of the high frequency permittivity ε′(∞), the latter quantity being unrelated to ion transport processes. Furthermore, we show how highly regarded shape changes of the modulus that occur with varying ion concentration are merely a manifestation of including ε′(∞) in the definition of M*(ν). We conclude then that the electric modulus formalism has resulted in misleading interpretations of the ion dynamics and, hence, should be discouraged.

AB - In the literature, the electric modulus representation has been used to provide comparative analysis of the ion transport properties in different ion-conducting materials. In this paper we show that the modulus representation is not a suitable tool for such purposes. Our arguments derive from an examination of the scaling properties of both the ac conductivity σ*(ν) and the modulus M*(ν) which demonstrates how scaling that is inherent in σ*(ν) is lost in M*(ν) by inclusion of the high frequency permittivity ε′(∞), the latter quantity being unrelated to ion transport processes. Furthermore, we show how highly regarded shape changes of the modulus that occur with varying ion concentration are merely a manifestation of including ε′(∞) in the definition of M*(ν). We conclude then that the electric modulus formalism has resulted in misleading interpretations of the ion dynamics and, hence, should be discouraged.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035137823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035137823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 243011

EP - 243017

JO - Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

JF - Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

SN - 1098-0121

IS - 2

M1 - 024301

ER -