Is analysis of lower esophageal sphincter vector volumes of value in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease?

Robert E. Marsh, Christopher L. Perdue, Ziad T. Awad, Patrice Watson, Mohammed Selima, Richard E. Davis, Charles Filipi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: With successful surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), there is interest in understanding the anti-reflux barrier and its mechanisms of failure. To date, the potential use of vector volumes to predict the DeMeester score has not been adequately explored. Methods: 627 patients in the referral database received esophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring. Study data included LES resting pressure (LESP), overall LES length (OL) and abdominal length (AL), total vector volume (TVV) and intrabdominal vector volume (IVV). Results: In cases where LESP, TVV or IVV were all below normal, there was an 81.4 % probability of a positive DeMeester score. In cases where all three were normal, there was an 86.9 % probability that the DeMeester score would be negative. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) for LESP, TVV and IVV were nearly identical and indicated no useful cut-off values. Logistic regression demonstrated that LESP and IVV had the strongest association with a positive DeMeester score; however, the regression formula was only 76.1 % accurate. Conclusion: While the indices based on TVV, IVV and LESP are more sensitive and specific, respectively, than any single measurement, the measurement of vector volumes does not add significantly to the diagnosis of GERD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)174-178
Number of pages5
JournalWorld Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume9
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 15 2003

Fingerprint

Lower Esophageal Sphincter
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Pressure
Esophageal pH Monitoring
Manometry
ROC Curve
Referral and Consultation
Logistic Models
Databases

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Is analysis of lower esophageal sphincter vector volumes of value in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease? / Marsh, Robert E.; Perdue, Christopher L.; Awad, Ziad T.; Watson, Patrice; Selima, Mohammed; Davis, Richard E.; Filipi, Charles.

In: World Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 9, No. 1, 15.01.2003, p. 174-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Marsh, Robert E. ; Perdue, Christopher L. ; Awad, Ziad T. ; Watson, Patrice ; Selima, Mohammed ; Davis, Richard E. ; Filipi, Charles. / Is analysis of lower esophageal sphincter vector volumes of value in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease?. In: World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2003 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 174-178.
@article{65fd37a93c114ce3b4cf7694189f5672,
title = "Is analysis of lower esophageal sphincter vector volumes of value in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease?",
abstract = "Aim: With successful surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), there is interest in understanding the anti-reflux barrier and its mechanisms of failure. To date, the potential use of vector volumes to predict the DeMeester score has not been adequately explored. Methods: 627 patients in the referral database received esophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring. Study data included LES resting pressure (LESP), overall LES length (OL) and abdominal length (AL), total vector volume (TVV) and intrabdominal vector volume (IVV). Results: In cases where LESP, TVV or IVV were all below normal, there was an 81.4 {\%} probability of a positive DeMeester score. In cases where all three were normal, there was an 86.9 {\%} probability that the DeMeester score would be negative. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) for LESP, TVV and IVV were nearly identical and indicated no useful cut-off values. Logistic regression demonstrated that LESP and IVV had the strongest association with a positive DeMeester score; however, the regression formula was only 76.1 {\%} accurate. Conclusion: While the indices based on TVV, IVV and LESP are more sensitive and specific, respectively, than any single measurement, the measurement of vector volumes does not add significantly to the diagnosis of GERD.",
author = "Marsh, {Robert E.} and Perdue, {Christopher L.} and Awad, {Ziad T.} and Patrice Watson and Mohammed Selima and Davis, {Richard E.} and Charles Filipi",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "15",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "174--178",
journal = "World Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "1007-9327",
publisher = "WJG Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is analysis of lower esophageal sphincter vector volumes of value in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease?

AU - Marsh, Robert E.

AU - Perdue, Christopher L.

AU - Awad, Ziad T.

AU - Watson, Patrice

AU - Selima, Mohammed

AU - Davis, Richard E.

AU - Filipi, Charles

PY - 2003/1/15

Y1 - 2003/1/15

N2 - Aim: With successful surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), there is interest in understanding the anti-reflux barrier and its mechanisms of failure. To date, the potential use of vector volumes to predict the DeMeester score has not been adequately explored. Methods: 627 patients in the referral database received esophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring. Study data included LES resting pressure (LESP), overall LES length (OL) and abdominal length (AL), total vector volume (TVV) and intrabdominal vector volume (IVV). Results: In cases where LESP, TVV or IVV were all below normal, there was an 81.4 % probability of a positive DeMeester score. In cases where all three were normal, there was an 86.9 % probability that the DeMeester score would be negative. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) for LESP, TVV and IVV were nearly identical and indicated no useful cut-off values. Logistic regression demonstrated that LESP and IVV had the strongest association with a positive DeMeester score; however, the regression formula was only 76.1 % accurate. Conclusion: While the indices based on TVV, IVV and LESP are more sensitive and specific, respectively, than any single measurement, the measurement of vector volumes does not add significantly to the diagnosis of GERD.

AB - Aim: With successful surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), there is interest in understanding the anti-reflux barrier and its mechanisms of failure. To date, the potential use of vector volumes to predict the DeMeester score has not been adequately explored. Methods: 627 patients in the referral database received esophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring. Study data included LES resting pressure (LESP), overall LES length (OL) and abdominal length (AL), total vector volume (TVV) and intrabdominal vector volume (IVV). Results: In cases where LESP, TVV or IVV were all below normal, there was an 81.4 % probability of a positive DeMeester score. In cases where all three were normal, there was an 86.9 % probability that the DeMeester score would be negative. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) for LESP, TVV and IVV were nearly identical and indicated no useful cut-off values. Logistic regression demonstrated that LESP and IVV had the strongest association with a positive DeMeester score; however, the regression formula was only 76.1 % accurate. Conclusion: While the indices based on TVV, IVV and LESP are more sensitive and specific, respectively, than any single measurement, the measurement of vector volumes does not add significantly to the diagnosis of GERD.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037439209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037439209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 174

EP - 178

JO - World Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - World Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 1007-9327

IS - 1

ER -