Is it time to change state and regional dental licensure board exams in response to evidence from caries research?

K. J. Anusavicel, Douglas Benn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

State and regional board exams represent the final gateway to dental licensure. One would expect that the requirements for licensure would reflect procedures that are beneficial to each patient's oral health and that are consistent with the teachings of most dental schools. We conducted an Internet survey to determine whether Class 2 tooth preparations based on caries lesions whose radiolucencies were confined to enamel were allowed for state and regional exams. Information obtained for 46 of the 50 states revealed that 33 of the states (72%) allowed teeth with either an E1 or E2 lesion to be restored. Seventeen of these states allowed teeth with an E1 lesion to be restored. Only 12 of the 46 states (26%) covered by these boards did not allow teeth with E1 or E2 lesions to be surgically treated. In contrast, a recent report indicates that only 30% of dental schools permit teeth with enamel lesions to be restored to satisfy clinical requirements and competencies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)368-372
Number of pages5
JournalCritical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine
Volume12
Issue number5
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dental Licensure
Tooth
Dental Schools
Dental Enamel
Research
Tooth Preparation
Clinical Competence
Oral Health
Licensure
Internet
Teaching

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{c7d5363b59f3470dbec41c71657af37c,
title = "Is it time to change state and regional dental licensure board exams in response to evidence from caries research?",
abstract = "State and regional board exams represent the final gateway to dental licensure. One would expect that the requirements for licensure would reflect procedures that are beneficial to each patient's oral health and that are consistent with the teachings of most dental schools. We conducted an Internet survey to determine whether Class 2 tooth preparations based on caries lesions whose radiolucencies were confined to enamel were allowed for state and regional exams. Information obtained for 46 of the 50 states revealed that 33 of the states (72{\%}) allowed teeth with either an E1 or E2 lesion to be restored. Seventeen of these states allowed teeth with an E1 lesion to be restored. Only 12 of the 46 states (26{\%}) covered by these boards did not allow teeth with E1 or E2 lesions to be surgically treated. In contrast, a recent report indicates that only 30{\%} of dental schools permit teeth with enamel lesions to be restored to satisfy clinical requirements and competencies.",
author = "Anusavicel, {K. J.} and Douglas Benn",
year = "2001",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "368--372",
journal = "Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine",
issn = "1045-4411",
publisher = "International and American Associations for Dental Research",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is it time to change state and regional dental licensure board exams in response to evidence from caries research?

AU - Anusavicel, K. J.

AU - Benn, Douglas

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - State and regional board exams represent the final gateway to dental licensure. One would expect that the requirements for licensure would reflect procedures that are beneficial to each patient's oral health and that are consistent with the teachings of most dental schools. We conducted an Internet survey to determine whether Class 2 tooth preparations based on caries lesions whose radiolucencies were confined to enamel were allowed for state and regional exams. Information obtained for 46 of the 50 states revealed that 33 of the states (72%) allowed teeth with either an E1 or E2 lesion to be restored. Seventeen of these states allowed teeth with an E1 lesion to be restored. Only 12 of the 46 states (26%) covered by these boards did not allow teeth with E1 or E2 lesions to be surgically treated. In contrast, a recent report indicates that only 30% of dental schools permit teeth with enamel lesions to be restored to satisfy clinical requirements and competencies.

AB - State and regional board exams represent the final gateway to dental licensure. One would expect that the requirements for licensure would reflect procedures that are beneficial to each patient's oral health and that are consistent with the teachings of most dental schools. We conducted an Internet survey to determine whether Class 2 tooth preparations based on caries lesions whose radiolucencies were confined to enamel were allowed for state and regional exams. Information obtained for 46 of the 50 states revealed that 33 of the states (72%) allowed teeth with either an E1 or E2 lesion to be restored. Seventeen of these states allowed teeth with an E1 lesion to be restored. Only 12 of the 46 states (26%) covered by these boards did not allow teeth with E1 or E2 lesions to be surgically treated. In contrast, a recent report indicates that only 30% of dental schools permit teeth with enamel lesions to be restored to satisfy clinical requirements and competencies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034753902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034753902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12002820

AN - SCOPUS:0034753902

VL - 12

SP - 368

EP - 372

JO - Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine

JF - Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine

SN - 1045-4411

IS - 5

ER -