Is the paradigm shifting?

Robert P. Heaney

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

246 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reduction in bone mass has long dominated the thinking about and approach to the problem of osteoporosis. A now large body of evidence indicates that bone mass is not adequate to explain satisfactorily either the skeletal fragility of osteoporosis or the effects of bone active agents. By contrast, bone remodeling activity seems to provide a better explanation of both. It is suggested that current syntheses in the field are shifting to this conclusion. In attempting to make sense out of how a process designed by evolution to sustain bone strength could instead be contributing to weakness, I suggest: (1) prevailing bone remodeling levels are substantially higher than are optimal for maintenance of bone strength; (2) this high level has discernible environmental causes; and (3) such high remodeling is a major source - perhaps the major source - of osteoporotic bony fragility. Within this context, reduced bone mass, rather than the primary cause of fracture, is seen as a factor that predisposes individuals to the harmful effects of excessive remodeling.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)457-465
Number of pages9
JournalBone
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2003

Fingerprint

Bone and Bones
Bone Remodeling
Osteoporosis
Maintenance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physiology
  • Hematology

Cite this

Is the paradigm shifting? / Heaney, Robert P.

In: Bone, Vol. 33, No. 4, 01.10.2003, p. 457-465.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Heaney, RP 2003, 'Is the paradigm shifting?', Bone, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 457-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(03)00236-9
Heaney, Robert P. / Is the paradigm shifting?. In: Bone. 2003 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 457-465.
@article{4ee65b091ad7498ab9339c4a8c559780,
title = "Is the paradigm shifting?",
abstract = "Reduction in bone mass has long dominated the thinking about and approach to the problem of osteoporosis. A now large body of evidence indicates that bone mass is not adequate to explain satisfactorily either the skeletal fragility of osteoporosis or the effects of bone active agents. By contrast, bone remodeling activity seems to provide a better explanation of both. It is suggested that current syntheses in the field are shifting to this conclusion. In attempting to make sense out of how a process designed by evolution to sustain bone strength could instead be contributing to weakness, I suggest: (1) prevailing bone remodeling levels are substantially higher than are optimal for maintenance of bone strength; (2) this high level has discernible environmental causes; and (3) such high remodeling is a major source - perhaps the major source - of osteoporotic bony fragility. Within this context, reduced bone mass, rather than the primary cause of fracture, is seen as a factor that predisposes individuals to the harmful effects of excessive remodeling.",
author = "Heaney, {Robert P.}",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S8756-3282(03)00236-9",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "457--465",
journal = "Bone",
issn = "8756-3282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the paradigm shifting?

AU - Heaney, Robert P.

PY - 2003/10/1

Y1 - 2003/10/1

N2 - Reduction in bone mass has long dominated the thinking about and approach to the problem of osteoporosis. A now large body of evidence indicates that bone mass is not adequate to explain satisfactorily either the skeletal fragility of osteoporosis or the effects of bone active agents. By contrast, bone remodeling activity seems to provide a better explanation of both. It is suggested that current syntheses in the field are shifting to this conclusion. In attempting to make sense out of how a process designed by evolution to sustain bone strength could instead be contributing to weakness, I suggest: (1) prevailing bone remodeling levels are substantially higher than are optimal for maintenance of bone strength; (2) this high level has discernible environmental causes; and (3) such high remodeling is a major source - perhaps the major source - of osteoporotic bony fragility. Within this context, reduced bone mass, rather than the primary cause of fracture, is seen as a factor that predisposes individuals to the harmful effects of excessive remodeling.

AB - Reduction in bone mass has long dominated the thinking about and approach to the problem of osteoporosis. A now large body of evidence indicates that bone mass is not adequate to explain satisfactorily either the skeletal fragility of osteoporosis or the effects of bone active agents. By contrast, bone remodeling activity seems to provide a better explanation of both. It is suggested that current syntheses in the field are shifting to this conclusion. In attempting to make sense out of how a process designed by evolution to sustain bone strength could instead be contributing to weakness, I suggest: (1) prevailing bone remodeling levels are substantially higher than are optimal for maintenance of bone strength; (2) this high level has discernible environmental causes; and (3) such high remodeling is a major source - perhaps the major source - of osteoporotic bony fragility. Within this context, reduced bone mass, rather than the primary cause of fracture, is seen as a factor that predisposes individuals to the harmful effects of excessive remodeling.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141527583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141527583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S8756-3282(03)00236-9

DO - 10.1016/S8756-3282(03)00236-9

M3 - Review article

VL - 33

SP - 457

EP - 465

JO - Bone

JF - Bone

SN - 8756-3282

IS - 4

ER -