Abstract
Objective: To examine the hypothesis that the futility of short-term care for trauma patients requiring emergency operation can be determined based on the number of units of blood transfused and associated risk factors. Design: A 4-year retrospective review of a cohort of critically injured patients who underwent an emergency operation. Setting: A large-volume, academic level I, urban trauma center. Patients: One hundred forty-one consecutive patients received massive blood transfusions of 20 U or more of blood during preoperative and intraoperative resuscitation (highest, 68 U). There were 43 survivors (30.5%) and 98 nonsurvivors (69.5%). Main Outcome Measures: Mortality. Results: The number of blood units transfused did not differ between survivors and nonsurvivors (mean ± SD, 31 ± 11 vs 32 ± 10; P = .52). Stepwise multiple regression analysis identified 3 independent variables associated with mortality: need for aortic clamping, intraoperative use of inotropes, and intraoperative time with a systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or less. However, blood usage was not different among the subgroups of patients who had 1 or more of these risk factors. When patients were stratified according to the amount of massive blood transfusion (20-29, 30- 39, 40-49, and 50-68 U), the incidence of risk factors was not different across the 4 subgroups. Survival in the presence of risk factors was not affected by the amount of blood transfused. Conclusions: Although mortality among critically injured patients requiring operation and massive blood transfusion can be correlated with independent risk factors, discontinuation of short-term care cannot be justified based on the need for massive blood transfusion of up to 68 units.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 947-952 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Archives of Surgery |
| Volume | 133 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1998 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Surgery
Cite this
Is there a limit to massive blood transfusion after severe trauma? / Velmahos, George C.; Chan, Linda; Chan, Michael; Tatevossian, Raymond; Cornwell, Edward E.; Asensio, Juan A.; Berne, Thomas V.; Demetriades, Demetrios.
In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 133, No. 9, 09.1998, p. 947-952.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Is there a limit to massive blood transfusion after severe trauma?
AU - Velmahos, George C.
AU - Chan, Linda
AU - Chan, Michael
AU - Tatevossian, Raymond
AU - Cornwell, Edward E.
AU - Asensio, Juan A.
AU - Berne, Thomas V.
AU - Demetriades, Demetrios
PY - 1998/9
Y1 - 1998/9
N2 - Objective: To examine the hypothesis that the futility of short-term care for trauma patients requiring emergency operation can be determined based on the number of units of blood transfused and associated risk factors. Design: A 4-year retrospective review of a cohort of critically injured patients who underwent an emergency operation. Setting: A large-volume, academic level I, urban trauma center. Patients: One hundred forty-one consecutive patients received massive blood transfusions of 20 U or more of blood during preoperative and intraoperative resuscitation (highest, 68 U). There were 43 survivors (30.5%) and 98 nonsurvivors (69.5%). Main Outcome Measures: Mortality. Results: The number of blood units transfused did not differ between survivors and nonsurvivors (mean ± SD, 31 ± 11 vs 32 ± 10; P = .52). Stepwise multiple regression analysis identified 3 independent variables associated with mortality: need for aortic clamping, intraoperative use of inotropes, and intraoperative time with a systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or less. However, blood usage was not different among the subgroups of patients who had 1 or more of these risk factors. When patients were stratified according to the amount of massive blood transfusion (20-29, 30- 39, 40-49, and 50-68 U), the incidence of risk factors was not different across the 4 subgroups. Survival in the presence of risk factors was not affected by the amount of blood transfused. Conclusions: Although mortality among critically injured patients requiring operation and massive blood transfusion can be correlated with independent risk factors, discontinuation of short-term care cannot be justified based on the need for massive blood transfusion of up to 68 units.
AB - Objective: To examine the hypothesis that the futility of short-term care for trauma patients requiring emergency operation can be determined based on the number of units of blood transfused and associated risk factors. Design: A 4-year retrospective review of a cohort of critically injured patients who underwent an emergency operation. Setting: A large-volume, academic level I, urban trauma center. Patients: One hundred forty-one consecutive patients received massive blood transfusions of 20 U or more of blood during preoperative and intraoperative resuscitation (highest, 68 U). There were 43 survivors (30.5%) and 98 nonsurvivors (69.5%). Main Outcome Measures: Mortality. Results: The number of blood units transfused did not differ between survivors and nonsurvivors (mean ± SD, 31 ± 11 vs 32 ± 10; P = .52). Stepwise multiple regression analysis identified 3 independent variables associated with mortality: need for aortic clamping, intraoperative use of inotropes, and intraoperative time with a systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or less. However, blood usage was not different among the subgroups of patients who had 1 or more of these risk factors. When patients were stratified according to the amount of massive blood transfusion (20-29, 30- 39, 40-49, and 50-68 U), the incidence of risk factors was not different across the 4 subgroups. Survival in the presence of risk factors was not affected by the amount of blood transfused. Conclusions: Although mortality among critically injured patients requiring operation and massive blood transfusion can be correlated with independent risk factors, discontinuation of short-term care cannot be justified based on the need for massive blood transfusion of up to 68 units.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031691176&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031691176&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/archsurg.133.9.947
DO - 10.1001/archsurg.133.9.947
M3 - Article
C2 - 9749845
AN - SCOPUS:0031691176
VL - 133
SP - 947
EP - 952
JO - JAMA Surgery
JF - JAMA Surgery
SN - 2168-6254
IS - 9
ER -