Isotopic exchange of ingested calcium between labeled sources. Evidence that ingested calcium does not form a common absorptive pool

Connie M. Weaver, Robert P. Heaney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We studied the extent of salt dissociation during absorption of calcium from sources of differing absorbability by measuring fractional absorption from loads in the range of 200-300 mg in healthy adult women. Sources were labeled both intrinsically and extrinsically with45Ca and47Ca, respectively, and were fed alone and in combination with one another. We first confirmed our previous observation of superior absorbability of calcium oxalate over spinach calcium in a randomized cross-over design in 20 women. Spinach calcium exhibited only half the absorbability of the same load of calcium presented as the oxalate. Then, in 14 women fed spinach with both an intrinsic and an extrinsic label, apparent absorption of the extrinsic label averaged 0.130±0.041 and of the intrinsic label, 0.029±0.023. Thus, the extrinsic tag was partially, but not completely, bound by the spinach. In the same 14 women, milk absorption averaged 0.331±0.092 when ingested alone. However, when coingested with spinach, apparent milk calcium absorption fell to 0.267±0.079 and apparent spinach calcium absorption rose to 0.111±0.039. Thus, there was significant but incomplete label exchange between the two sources, indicating that at least some of the calcium from both sources enters a common preabsorptive, ionic pool. By contrast, we had previously shown no tracer exchange when labeled oxalate was co-fed with labeled milk. We conclude that (1) the presence of calcium as the oxalate in spinach is not a sufficient explanation for the poor absorbability of spinach calcium; and (2) oxalate calcium and spinach calcium are absorbed by different mechanisms, one involving a common preabsorptive pool and the other not. We suggest that oxalate calcium absorption is by passive diffusion of the intact complex and spinach calcium absorption by active transport of the free cation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)244-247
Number of pages4
JournalCalcified Tissue International
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1991

Fingerprint

Spinacia oleracea
Calcium
Calcium Oxalate
Oxalates
Milk
Calcium Carbonate
Active Biological Transport
Cross-Over Studies
Cations
Salts
Observation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Endocrinology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

Isotopic exchange of ingested calcium between labeled sources. Evidence that ingested calcium does not form a common absorptive pool. / Weaver, Connie M.; Heaney, Robert P.

In: Calcified Tissue International, Vol. 49, No. 4, 07.1991, p. 244-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c3d259f0970b480d985d474aa8a8ce2f,
title = "Isotopic exchange of ingested calcium between labeled sources. Evidence that ingested calcium does not form a common absorptive pool",
abstract = "We studied the extent of salt dissociation during absorption of calcium from sources of differing absorbability by measuring fractional absorption from loads in the range of 200-300 mg in healthy adult women. Sources were labeled both intrinsically and extrinsically with45Ca and47Ca, respectively, and were fed alone and in combination with one another. We first confirmed our previous observation of superior absorbability of calcium oxalate over spinach calcium in a randomized cross-over design in 20 women. Spinach calcium exhibited only half the absorbability of the same load of calcium presented as the oxalate. Then, in 14 women fed spinach with both an intrinsic and an extrinsic label, apparent absorption of the extrinsic label averaged 0.130±0.041 and of the intrinsic label, 0.029±0.023. Thus, the extrinsic tag was partially, but not completely, bound by the spinach. In the same 14 women, milk absorption averaged 0.331±0.092 when ingested alone. However, when coingested with spinach, apparent milk calcium absorption fell to 0.267±0.079 and apparent spinach calcium absorption rose to 0.111±0.039. Thus, there was significant but incomplete label exchange between the two sources, indicating that at least some of the calcium from both sources enters a common preabsorptive, ionic pool. By contrast, we had previously shown no tracer exchange when labeled oxalate was co-fed with labeled milk. We conclude that (1) the presence of calcium as the oxalate in spinach is not a sufficient explanation for the poor absorbability of spinach calcium; and (2) oxalate calcium and spinach calcium are absorbed by different mechanisms, one involving a common preabsorptive pool and the other not. We suggest that oxalate calcium absorption is by passive diffusion of the intact complex and spinach calcium absorption by active transport of the free cation.",
author = "Weaver, {Connie M.} and Heaney, {Robert P.}",
year = "1991",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/BF02556212",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "244--247",
journal = "Calcified Tissue International",
issn = "0171-967X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Isotopic exchange of ingested calcium between labeled sources. Evidence that ingested calcium does not form a common absorptive pool

AU - Weaver, Connie M.

AU - Heaney, Robert P.

PY - 1991/7

Y1 - 1991/7

N2 - We studied the extent of salt dissociation during absorption of calcium from sources of differing absorbability by measuring fractional absorption from loads in the range of 200-300 mg in healthy adult women. Sources were labeled both intrinsically and extrinsically with45Ca and47Ca, respectively, and were fed alone and in combination with one another. We first confirmed our previous observation of superior absorbability of calcium oxalate over spinach calcium in a randomized cross-over design in 20 women. Spinach calcium exhibited only half the absorbability of the same load of calcium presented as the oxalate. Then, in 14 women fed spinach with both an intrinsic and an extrinsic label, apparent absorption of the extrinsic label averaged 0.130±0.041 and of the intrinsic label, 0.029±0.023. Thus, the extrinsic tag was partially, but not completely, bound by the spinach. In the same 14 women, milk absorption averaged 0.331±0.092 when ingested alone. However, when coingested with spinach, apparent milk calcium absorption fell to 0.267±0.079 and apparent spinach calcium absorption rose to 0.111±0.039. Thus, there was significant but incomplete label exchange between the two sources, indicating that at least some of the calcium from both sources enters a common preabsorptive, ionic pool. By contrast, we had previously shown no tracer exchange when labeled oxalate was co-fed with labeled milk. We conclude that (1) the presence of calcium as the oxalate in spinach is not a sufficient explanation for the poor absorbability of spinach calcium; and (2) oxalate calcium and spinach calcium are absorbed by different mechanisms, one involving a common preabsorptive pool and the other not. We suggest that oxalate calcium absorption is by passive diffusion of the intact complex and spinach calcium absorption by active transport of the free cation.

AB - We studied the extent of salt dissociation during absorption of calcium from sources of differing absorbability by measuring fractional absorption from loads in the range of 200-300 mg in healthy adult women. Sources were labeled both intrinsically and extrinsically with45Ca and47Ca, respectively, and were fed alone and in combination with one another. We first confirmed our previous observation of superior absorbability of calcium oxalate over spinach calcium in a randomized cross-over design in 20 women. Spinach calcium exhibited only half the absorbability of the same load of calcium presented as the oxalate. Then, in 14 women fed spinach with both an intrinsic and an extrinsic label, apparent absorption of the extrinsic label averaged 0.130±0.041 and of the intrinsic label, 0.029±0.023. Thus, the extrinsic tag was partially, but not completely, bound by the spinach. In the same 14 women, milk absorption averaged 0.331±0.092 when ingested alone. However, when coingested with spinach, apparent milk calcium absorption fell to 0.267±0.079 and apparent spinach calcium absorption rose to 0.111±0.039. Thus, there was significant but incomplete label exchange between the two sources, indicating that at least some of the calcium from both sources enters a common preabsorptive, ionic pool. By contrast, we had previously shown no tracer exchange when labeled oxalate was co-fed with labeled milk. We conclude that (1) the presence of calcium as the oxalate in spinach is not a sufficient explanation for the poor absorbability of spinach calcium; and (2) oxalate calcium and spinach calcium are absorbed by different mechanisms, one involving a common preabsorptive pool and the other not. We suggest that oxalate calcium absorption is by passive diffusion of the intact complex and spinach calcium absorption by active transport of the free cation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026335461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026335461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02556212

DO - 10.1007/BF02556212

M3 - Article

C2 - 1760767

AN - SCOPUS:0026335461

VL - 49

SP - 244

EP - 247

JO - Calcified Tissue International

JF - Calcified Tissue International

SN - 0171-967X

IS - 4

ER -