Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: Why they fail

Charles Filipi

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The incidence of laparoscopic hiatal hernia recurrence has recently been questioned. The results with open repair have been accepted, but increasingly there is interest in mesh reinforcement when performing laparoscopic surgery. Several small series of mesh repair suggest efficacy. Further study of the causes of failure after the laparoscopic approach is warranted and may assist in determining the place of prosthetic reinforcement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)219-222
Number of pages4
JournalHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery
Volume4
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Hiatal Hernia
Herniorrhaphy
Laparoscopy
Recurrence
Incidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair : Why they fail. / Filipi, Charles.

In: Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2000, p. 219-222.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Filipi, C 2000, 'Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: Why they fail', Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 219-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01201070
Filipi C. Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: Why they fail. Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery. 2000;4(4):219-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01201070
Filipi, Charles. / Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair : Why they fail. In: Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery. 2000 ; Vol. 4, No. 4. pp. 219-222.
@article{c00756c2363e431c9619b704afa9e5ee,
title = "Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: Why they fail",
abstract = "The incidence of laparoscopic hiatal hernia recurrence has recently been questioned. The results with open repair have been accepted, but increasingly there is interest in mesh reinforcement when performing laparoscopic surgery. Several small series of mesh repair suggest efficacy. Further study of the causes of failure after the laparoscopic approach is warranted and may assist in determining the place of prosthetic reinforcement.",
author = "Charles Filipi",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1007/BF01201070",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "219--222",
journal = "Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery",
issn = "1265-4906",
publisher = "Springer Paris",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair

T2 - Why they fail

AU - Filipi, Charles

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The incidence of laparoscopic hiatal hernia recurrence has recently been questioned. The results with open repair have been accepted, but increasingly there is interest in mesh reinforcement when performing laparoscopic surgery. Several small series of mesh repair suggest efficacy. Further study of the causes of failure after the laparoscopic approach is warranted and may assist in determining the place of prosthetic reinforcement.

AB - The incidence of laparoscopic hiatal hernia recurrence has recently been questioned. The results with open repair have been accepted, but increasingly there is interest in mesh reinforcement when performing laparoscopic surgery. Several small series of mesh repair suggest efficacy. Further study of the causes of failure after the laparoscopic approach is warranted and may assist in determining the place of prosthetic reinforcement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034523971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034523971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01201070

DO - 10.1007/BF01201070

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034523971

VL - 4

SP - 219

EP - 222

JO - Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery

JF - Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery

SN - 1265-4906

IS - 4

ER -

Access to Document