Laparoscopic ultrasonography as compared with static or dynamic cholangiography at laparoscopic cholecystectomy - A prospective multicenter trial

G. V. Stiegmann; N. J. Soper; Charles Filipi; R. C. McIntyre; M. P. Callery; J. F. Cordova

doi:10.1007/BF00190157

Laparoscopic ultrasonography as compared with static or dynamic cholangiography at laparoscopic cholecystectomy - A prospective multicenter trial

G. V. Stiegmann, N. J. Soper, Charles Filipi, R. C. McIntyre, M. P. Callery, J. F. Cordova

Department of Surgery

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

55 Scopus citations

Abstract

We compared laparoscopic ultrasonography (LICU) with static (S) or dynamic (D) cholangiography (IOC) for assessment of duct anatomy and calculi in 209 patients. LICU visualized ducts in 88% compared with 93% for IOC (P=0.046). Nineteen patients (9%) had stones: 17 were found by LICU (89%) and 10 (53%) by IOC (P=0.032). Time to perform LICU (7±3 min) was less than IOC (13±6 min) (P

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1269-1273
Number of pages	5
Journal	Surgical Endoscopy
Volume	9
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00190157
State	Published - Dec 1995

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Surgery

Access to Document

10.1007/BF00190157

Cite this

@article{cdc13558a08a44c9ab8905f5fdfde9ac,

title = "Laparoscopic ultrasonography as compared with static or dynamic cholangiography at laparoscopic cholecystectomy - A prospective multicenter trial",

abstract = "We compared laparoscopic ultrasonography (LICU) with static (S) or dynamic (D) cholangiography (IOC) for assessment of duct anatomy and calculi in 209 patients. LICU visualized ducts in 88% compared with 93% for IOC (P=0.046). Nineteen patients (9%) had stones: 17 were found by LICU (89%) and 10 (53%) by IOC (P=0.032). Time to perform LICU (7±3 min) was less than IOC (13±6 min) (P",

author = "Stiegmann, {G. V.} and Soper, {N. J.} and Charles Filipi and McIntyre, {R. C.} and Callery, {M. P.} and Cordova, {J. F.}",

year = "1995",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1007/BF00190157",

language = "English",

volume = "9",

pages = "1269--1273",

journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",

issn = "0930-2794",

publisher = "Springer New York",

number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic ultrasonography as compared with static or dynamic cholangiography at laparoscopic cholecystectomy - A prospective multicenter trial

AU - Stiegmann, G. V.

AU - Soper, N. J.

AU - Filipi, Charles

AU - McIntyre, R. C.

AU - Callery, M. P.

AU - Cordova, J. F.

PY - 1995/12

Y1 - 1995/12

N2 - We compared laparoscopic ultrasonography (LICU) with static (S) or dynamic (D) cholangiography (IOC) for assessment of duct anatomy and calculi in 209 patients. LICU visualized ducts in 88% compared with 93% for IOC (P=0.046). Nineteen patients (9%) had stones: 17 were found by LICU (89%) and 10 (53%) by IOC (P=0.032). Time to perform LICU (7±3 min) was less than IOC (13±6 min) (P

AB - We compared laparoscopic ultrasonography (LICU) with static (S) or dynamic (D) cholangiography (IOC) for assessment of duct anatomy and calculi in 209 patients. LICU visualized ducts in 88% compared with 93% for IOC (P=0.046). Nineteen patients (9%) had stones: 17 were found by LICU (89%) and 10 (53%) by IOC (P=0.032). Time to perform LICU (7±3 min) was less than IOC (13±6 min) (P

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029438623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029438623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00190157

DO - 10.1007/BF00190157

M3 - Article

C2 - 8629207

AN - SCOPUS:0029438623

VL - 9

SP - 1269

EP - 1273

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 12

ER -

Laparoscopic ultrasonography as compared with static or dynamic cholangiography at laparoscopic cholecystectomy - A prospective multicenter trial

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this