TY - JOUR
T1 - Legal authority to preserve organs in cases of uncontrolled cardiac death
T2 - Preserving family choice
AU - Bonnie, Richard J.
AU - Wright, Stephanie
AU - Dineen, Kelly K.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2008/12
Y1 - 2008/12
N2 - The gap between the number of organs available for transplant and the number of individuals who need transplanted organs continues to increase. At the same time, thousands of transplantable organs are needlessly overlooked every year for the single reason that they come from individuals who were declared dead according to cardio pulmonary criteria. Expanding the donor population to individuals who die uncontrolled cardiac deaths will reduce this disparity, but only if organ preservation efforts are utilized. Concern about potential legal liability for temporary preservation of organs pending a search for family members appears to be one of the impediments to wider use of donation in cases of uncontrolled cardiac death in states without statutes explicitly authorizing such action. However, we think that the risk of liability for organ preservation under these circumstances is de minimis, and that concerns about legal impediments to preservation should yield to the ethical imperative of undertaking it.
AB - The gap between the number of organs available for transplant and the number of individuals who need transplanted organs continues to increase. At the same time, thousands of transplantable organs are needlessly overlooked every year for the single reason that they come from individuals who were declared dead according to cardio pulmonary criteria. Expanding the donor population to individuals who die uncontrolled cardiac deaths will reduce this disparity, but only if organ preservation efforts are utilized. Concern about potential legal liability for temporary preservation of organs pending a search for family members appears to be one of the impediments to wider use of donation in cases of uncontrolled cardiac death in states without statutes explicitly authorizing such action. However, we think that the risk of liability for organ preservation under these circumstances is de minimis, and that concerns about legal impediments to preservation should yield to the ethical imperative of undertaking it.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57349158932&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57349158932&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00333.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00333.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 19094002
AN - SCOPUS:57349158932
VL - 36
SP - 741
EP - 751
JO - Law, medicine & health care : a publication of the American Society of Law & Medicine
JF - Law, medicine & health care : a publication of the American Society of Law & Medicine
SN - 1073-1105
IS - 4
ER -