Locating genetic disease: The impact of clinical nosology on biomedical conceptions of the human genome (1966-1990)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The variability of disease expression often complicates clinical classification. Since the 1960s, medical geneticists have sought to address this problem by associating diseases with discrete locations in the human genome. While this nosological approach was quite successful in the 1980s, unanticipated complications arose. In 1987, two historically distinct disorders, Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes, were unexpectedly associated with the same genomic "address." Does genomic overlap imply nosological sameness? This paper explores the clinical and biological implications of this finding, and argues that the process by which it was resolved represented new modes of thinking and practice in late-twentieth-century biomedicine. In the decades before the completion of the Human Genome Project, the genome was understood to be, at once, a standardized scientific object and an observable part of the human anatomy. Depicted and analyzed at the level of chromosomes, the genome became an important conceptual space and experimental system for late-twentieth-century biomedicine, producing novel research questions that drew the attention of both clinically oriented physicians and basic laboratory geneticists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)78-96
Number of pages19
JournalNew Genetics and Society
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Inborn Genetic Diseases
biomedicine
Human Genome
twentieth century
Angelman Syndrome
Genome
Human Genome Project
Disease
Prader-Willi Syndrome
Anatomy
Chromosomes
physician
Physicians
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)
  • Genetics

Cite this

@article{8ec7b4666c654665ba1228d087711a54,
title = "Locating genetic disease: The impact of clinical nosology on biomedical conceptions of the human genome (1966-1990)",
abstract = "The variability of disease expression often complicates clinical classification. Since the 1960s, medical geneticists have sought to address this problem by associating diseases with discrete locations in the human genome. While this nosological approach was quite successful in the 1980s, unanticipated complications arose. In 1987, two historically distinct disorders, Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes, were unexpectedly associated with the same genomic {"}address.{"} Does genomic overlap imply nosological sameness? This paper explores the clinical and biological implications of this finding, and argues that the process by which it was resolved represented new modes of thinking and practice in late-twentieth-century biomedicine. In the decades before the completion of the Human Genome Project, the genome was understood to be, at once, a standardized scientific object and an observable part of the human anatomy. Depicted and analyzed at the level of chromosomes, the genome became an important conceptual space and experimental system for late-twentieth-century biomedicine, producing novel research questions that drew the attention of both clinically oriented physicians and basic laboratory geneticists.",
author = "Hogan, {Andrew J.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/14636778.2012.735855",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "78--96",
journal = "New Genetics and Society",
issn = "1463-6778",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Locating genetic disease

T2 - The impact of clinical nosology on biomedical conceptions of the human genome (1966-1990)

AU - Hogan, Andrew J.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The variability of disease expression often complicates clinical classification. Since the 1960s, medical geneticists have sought to address this problem by associating diseases with discrete locations in the human genome. While this nosological approach was quite successful in the 1980s, unanticipated complications arose. In 1987, two historically distinct disorders, Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes, were unexpectedly associated with the same genomic "address." Does genomic overlap imply nosological sameness? This paper explores the clinical and biological implications of this finding, and argues that the process by which it was resolved represented new modes of thinking and practice in late-twentieth-century biomedicine. In the decades before the completion of the Human Genome Project, the genome was understood to be, at once, a standardized scientific object and an observable part of the human anatomy. Depicted and analyzed at the level of chromosomes, the genome became an important conceptual space and experimental system for late-twentieth-century biomedicine, producing novel research questions that drew the attention of both clinically oriented physicians and basic laboratory geneticists.

AB - The variability of disease expression often complicates clinical classification. Since the 1960s, medical geneticists have sought to address this problem by associating diseases with discrete locations in the human genome. While this nosological approach was quite successful in the 1980s, unanticipated complications arose. In 1987, two historically distinct disorders, Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes, were unexpectedly associated with the same genomic "address." Does genomic overlap imply nosological sameness? This paper explores the clinical and biological implications of this finding, and argues that the process by which it was resolved represented new modes of thinking and practice in late-twentieth-century biomedicine. In the decades before the completion of the Human Genome Project, the genome was understood to be, at once, a standardized scientific object and an observable part of the human anatomy. Depicted and analyzed at the level of chromosomes, the genome became an important conceptual space and experimental system for late-twentieth-century biomedicine, producing novel research questions that drew the attention of both clinically oriented physicians and basic laboratory geneticists.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874615921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874615921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14636778.2012.735855

DO - 10.1080/14636778.2012.735855

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84874615921

VL - 32

SP - 78

EP - 96

JO - New Genetics and Society

JF - New Genetics and Society

SN - 1463-6778

IS - 1

ER -