Machiavellianism's association with sources of motivation and downward influence strategies

Jennifer Moss Breen, John E. Barbuto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent studies have examined the relationship between motivation and influence tactics with mixed results. Barbuto and Scholl found several strong relationships between leaders' sources of motivation and the influence tactics used when influencing subordinates, but replication yielded weaker relationships between motivation and influence tactics. Examinations of moderating variables such as leaders' Machiavellian disposition were suggested as possible explanations for this difference. Several interacting effects between leaders' sources of motivation and Machiavellianism have been proposed as predictors of the influence tactic used. This study tested these relationships and found modest association between motivation sources and influence tactics. Some moderating effects of Machiavellianism on this relationship were evident; however, interpretation is cautioned given poor psychometric properties of the measure. These issues are discussed along with suggestions for research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)933-943
Number of pages11
JournalPsychological Reports
Volume94
Issue number3 I
StatePublished - Jun 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Machiavellianism
Motivation
Psychometrics
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Machiavellianism's association with sources of motivation and downward influence strategies. / Moss Breen, Jennifer; Barbuto, John E.

In: Psychological Reports, Vol. 94, No. 3 I, 06.2004, p. 933-943.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e03e829eaddd45029bdecc871135e9e8,
title = "Machiavellianism's association with sources of motivation and downward influence strategies",
abstract = "Recent studies have examined the relationship between motivation and influence tactics with mixed results. Barbuto and Scholl found several strong relationships between leaders' sources of motivation and the influence tactics used when influencing subordinates, but replication yielded weaker relationships between motivation and influence tactics. Examinations of moderating variables such as leaders' Machiavellian disposition were suggested as possible explanations for this difference. Several interacting effects between leaders' sources of motivation and Machiavellianism have been proposed as predictors of the influence tactic used. This study tested these relationships and found modest association between motivation sources and influence tactics. Some moderating effects of Machiavellianism on this relationship were evident; however, interpretation is cautioned given poor psychometric properties of the measure. These issues are discussed along with suggestions for research.",
author = "{Moss Breen}, Jennifer and Barbuto, {John E.}",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "933--943",
journal = "Psychological Reports",
issn = "0033-2941",
publisher = "Ammons Scientific Ltd",
number = "3 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Machiavellianism's association with sources of motivation and downward influence strategies

AU - Moss Breen, Jennifer

AU - Barbuto, John E.

PY - 2004/6

Y1 - 2004/6

N2 - Recent studies have examined the relationship between motivation and influence tactics with mixed results. Barbuto and Scholl found several strong relationships between leaders' sources of motivation and the influence tactics used when influencing subordinates, but replication yielded weaker relationships between motivation and influence tactics. Examinations of moderating variables such as leaders' Machiavellian disposition were suggested as possible explanations for this difference. Several interacting effects between leaders' sources of motivation and Machiavellianism have been proposed as predictors of the influence tactic used. This study tested these relationships and found modest association between motivation sources and influence tactics. Some moderating effects of Machiavellianism on this relationship were evident; however, interpretation is cautioned given poor psychometric properties of the measure. These issues are discussed along with suggestions for research.

AB - Recent studies have examined the relationship between motivation and influence tactics with mixed results. Barbuto and Scholl found several strong relationships between leaders' sources of motivation and the influence tactics used when influencing subordinates, but replication yielded weaker relationships between motivation and influence tactics. Examinations of moderating variables such as leaders' Machiavellian disposition were suggested as possible explanations for this difference. Several interacting effects between leaders' sources of motivation and Machiavellianism have been proposed as predictors of the influence tactic used. This study tested these relationships and found modest association between motivation sources and influence tactics. Some moderating effects of Machiavellianism on this relationship were evident; however, interpretation is cautioned given poor psychometric properties of the measure. These issues are discussed along with suggestions for research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3142739302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3142739302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 94

SP - 933

EP - 943

JO - Psychological Reports

JF - Psychological Reports

SN - 0033-2941

IS - 3 I

ER -