Magisterium, theologians, and the need for dialogue

Todd A. Salzman, Michael G. Lawler

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Throughout history there have been theological tensions between official church teachers and church theologians, creating at times a divide between both the magisterium and theologians and also between theologians of different methodological approaches. We offer as examples of tension the declarations by the USCCB's Committee on Doctrine (CD) on the "inadequacies in the theological methodology and conclusions" of our book and of the books of three other contemporary theologians. These examples afford us the opportunity both to consider the theological tensions in general and to propose a solution to them. We establish some ecclesial context for dialogue with the CD, calling attention to four factors in this context: first, recent patterns of discourse between theologians and the magisterium in statements issued against particular theologians; second, an important change in the Catholic concept of church; third, an equally important change in how Catholic theologians set about doing theological ethics; and fourth, the reaffirmation of the importance of conscience by the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s and, more recently, by Pope Francis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-112
Number of pages34
JournalHorizons
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

theologian
dialogue
church
doctrine
conscience
pope
Theologians
Magisterium
moral philosophy
discourse
methodology
teacher
history

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Religious studies

Cite this

Magisterium, theologians, and the need for dialogue. / Salzman, Todd A.; Lawler, Michael G.

In: Horizons, Vol. 46, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 79-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Salzman, Todd A. ; Lawler, Michael G. / Magisterium, theologians, and the need for dialogue. In: Horizons. 2019 ; Vol. 46, No. 1. pp. 79-112.
@article{9ca9002948a3473bb5572e61d7b831f6,
title = "Magisterium, theologians, and the need for dialogue",
abstract = "Throughout history there have been theological tensions between official church teachers and church theologians, creating at times a divide between both the magisterium and theologians and also between theologians of different methodological approaches. We offer as examples of tension the declarations by the USCCB's Committee on Doctrine (CD) on the {"}inadequacies in the theological methodology and conclusions{"} of our book and of the books of three other contemporary theologians. These examples afford us the opportunity both to consider the theological tensions in general and to propose a solution to them. We establish some ecclesial context for dialogue with the CD, calling attention to four factors in this context: first, recent patterns of discourse between theologians and the magisterium in statements issued against particular theologians; second, an important change in the Catholic concept of church; third, an equally important change in how Catholic theologians set about doing theological ethics; and fourth, the reaffirmation of the importance of conscience by the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s and, more recently, by Pope Francis.",
author = "Salzman, {Todd A.} and Lawler, {Michael G.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/hor.2019.52",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "79--112",
journal = "Horizons",
issn = "0360-9669",
publisher = "College Theology Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Magisterium, theologians, and the need for dialogue

AU - Salzman, Todd A.

AU - Lawler, Michael G.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Throughout history there have been theological tensions between official church teachers and church theologians, creating at times a divide between both the magisterium and theologians and also between theologians of different methodological approaches. We offer as examples of tension the declarations by the USCCB's Committee on Doctrine (CD) on the "inadequacies in the theological methodology and conclusions" of our book and of the books of three other contemporary theologians. These examples afford us the opportunity both to consider the theological tensions in general and to propose a solution to them. We establish some ecclesial context for dialogue with the CD, calling attention to four factors in this context: first, recent patterns of discourse between theologians and the magisterium in statements issued against particular theologians; second, an important change in the Catholic concept of church; third, an equally important change in how Catholic theologians set about doing theological ethics; and fourth, the reaffirmation of the importance of conscience by the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s and, more recently, by Pope Francis.

AB - Throughout history there have been theological tensions between official church teachers and church theologians, creating at times a divide between both the magisterium and theologians and also between theologians of different methodological approaches. We offer as examples of tension the declarations by the USCCB's Committee on Doctrine (CD) on the "inadequacies in the theological methodology and conclusions" of our book and of the books of three other contemporary theologians. These examples afford us the opportunity both to consider the theological tensions in general and to propose a solution to them. We establish some ecclesial context for dialogue with the CD, calling attention to four factors in this context: first, recent patterns of discourse between theologians and the magisterium in statements issued against particular theologians; second, an important change in the Catholic concept of church; third, an equally important change in how Catholic theologians set about doing theological ethics; and fourth, the reaffirmation of the importance of conscience by the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s and, more recently, by Pope Francis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065656159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065656159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/hor.2019.52

DO - 10.1017/hor.2019.52

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85065656159

VL - 46

SP - 79

EP - 112

JO - Horizons

JF - Horizons

SN - 0360-9669

IS - 1

ER -