Management of retained colorectal foreign bodies

Predictors of operative intervention

Jeffrey P. Lake, Rahila Essani, Patrizio Petrone, Andreas M. Kaiser, Juan A. Asensio, Robert W. Beart

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to review experience at our hospital with retained colorectal foreign bodies. METHODS: We reviewed the consultation records at Los Angeles County + University of Southern California General Hospital from October 1993 through October 2002. Ninety-three cases of transanally introduced, retained foreign bodies were identified in 87 patients. Data collected included patient demographics, extraction method, location, size and type of foreign body, and postextraction course. RESULTS: Of 93 cases reviewed, there were 87 individuals who presented with first-time episodes of having a retained colorectal foreign body. For these patients, bedside extraction was successful in 74 percent. Ultimately, 23 patients were taken to the operating room for removal of their foreign body. In total, 17 examinations under anesthesia and 8 laparotomies were performed (2 patients initially underwent an anesthetized examination before laparotomy). In the eight patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy, only one had successful delivery of the foreign object into the rectum for transanal extraction. The remainder required repair of perforated bowel or retrieval of the foreign body via a colotomy. In our review, a majority of cases had objects retained within the rectum; the rest were located in the sigmoid colon. Fifty-five percent of patients (6/11) presenting with a foreign body in the sigmoid colon required operative intervention vs. 24 percent of patients (17/70) with objects in their rectum (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest single institution series of retained colorectal foreign bodies. Although foreign objects located in the sigmoid colon can be retrieved at the bedside, these cases are more likely to require operative intervention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1694-1698
Number of pages5
JournalDiseases of the Colon and Rectum
Volume47
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Foreign Bodies
Sigmoid Colon
Rectum
Laparotomy
Los Angeles
Operating Rooms
General Hospitals
Referral and Consultation
Anesthesia
Demography

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Management of retained colorectal foreign bodies : Predictors of operative intervention. / Lake, Jeffrey P.; Essani, Rahila; Petrone, Patrizio; Kaiser, Andreas M.; Asensio, Juan A.; Beart, Robert W.

In: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, Vol. 47, No. 10, 10.2004, p. 1694-1698.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Lake, Jeffrey P. ; Essani, Rahila ; Petrone, Patrizio ; Kaiser, Andreas M. ; Asensio, Juan A. ; Beart, Robert W. / Management of retained colorectal foreign bodies : Predictors of operative intervention. In: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2004 ; Vol. 47, No. 10. pp. 1694-1698.
@article{37eaaa1042914b49b65f3c4957f936e7,
title = "Management of retained colorectal foreign bodies: Predictors of operative intervention",
abstract = "PURPOSE: This study was designed to review experience at our hospital with retained colorectal foreign bodies. METHODS: We reviewed the consultation records at Los Angeles County + University of Southern California General Hospital from October 1993 through October 2002. Ninety-three cases of transanally introduced, retained foreign bodies were identified in 87 patients. Data collected included patient demographics, extraction method, location, size and type of foreign body, and postextraction course. RESULTS: Of 93 cases reviewed, there were 87 individuals who presented with first-time episodes of having a retained colorectal foreign body. For these patients, bedside extraction was successful in 74 percent. Ultimately, 23 patients were taken to the operating room for removal of their foreign body. In total, 17 examinations under anesthesia and 8 laparotomies were performed (2 patients initially underwent an anesthetized examination before laparotomy). In the eight patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy, only one had successful delivery of the foreign object into the rectum for transanal extraction. The remainder required repair of perforated bowel or retrieval of the foreign body via a colotomy. In our review, a majority of cases had objects retained within the rectum; the rest were located in the sigmoid colon. Fifty-five percent of patients (6/11) presenting with a foreign body in the sigmoid colon required operative intervention vs. 24 percent of patients (17/70) with objects in their rectum (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest single institution series of retained colorectal foreign bodies. Although foreign objects located in the sigmoid colon can be retrieved at the bedside, these cases are more likely to require operative intervention.",
author = "Lake, {Jeffrey P.} and Rahila Essani and Patrizio Petrone and Kaiser, {Andreas M.} and Asensio, {Juan A.} and Beart, {Robert W.}",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s10350-004-0676-4",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "1694--1698",
journal = "Diseases of the Colon and Rectum",
issn = "0012-3706",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of retained colorectal foreign bodies

T2 - Predictors of operative intervention

AU - Lake, Jeffrey P.

AU - Essani, Rahila

AU - Petrone, Patrizio

AU - Kaiser, Andreas M.

AU - Asensio, Juan A.

AU - Beart, Robert W.

PY - 2004/10

Y1 - 2004/10

N2 - PURPOSE: This study was designed to review experience at our hospital with retained colorectal foreign bodies. METHODS: We reviewed the consultation records at Los Angeles County + University of Southern California General Hospital from October 1993 through October 2002. Ninety-three cases of transanally introduced, retained foreign bodies were identified in 87 patients. Data collected included patient demographics, extraction method, location, size and type of foreign body, and postextraction course. RESULTS: Of 93 cases reviewed, there were 87 individuals who presented with first-time episodes of having a retained colorectal foreign body. For these patients, bedside extraction was successful in 74 percent. Ultimately, 23 patients were taken to the operating room for removal of their foreign body. In total, 17 examinations under anesthesia and 8 laparotomies were performed (2 patients initially underwent an anesthetized examination before laparotomy). In the eight patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy, only one had successful delivery of the foreign object into the rectum for transanal extraction. The remainder required repair of perforated bowel or retrieval of the foreign body via a colotomy. In our review, a majority of cases had objects retained within the rectum; the rest were located in the sigmoid colon. Fifty-five percent of patients (6/11) presenting with a foreign body in the sigmoid colon required operative intervention vs. 24 percent of patients (17/70) with objects in their rectum (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest single institution series of retained colorectal foreign bodies. Although foreign objects located in the sigmoid colon can be retrieved at the bedside, these cases are more likely to require operative intervention.

AB - PURPOSE: This study was designed to review experience at our hospital with retained colorectal foreign bodies. METHODS: We reviewed the consultation records at Los Angeles County + University of Southern California General Hospital from October 1993 through October 2002. Ninety-three cases of transanally introduced, retained foreign bodies were identified in 87 patients. Data collected included patient demographics, extraction method, location, size and type of foreign body, and postextraction course. RESULTS: Of 93 cases reviewed, there were 87 individuals who presented with first-time episodes of having a retained colorectal foreign body. For these patients, bedside extraction was successful in 74 percent. Ultimately, 23 patients were taken to the operating room for removal of their foreign body. In total, 17 examinations under anesthesia and 8 laparotomies were performed (2 patients initially underwent an anesthetized examination before laparotomy). In the eight patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy, only one had successful delivery of the foreign object into the rectum for transanal extraction. The remainder required repair of perforated bowel or retrieval of the foreign body via a colotomy. In our review, a majority of cases had objects retained within the rectum; the rest were located in the sigmoid colon. Fifty-five percent of patients (6/11) presenting with a foreign body in the sigmoid colon required operative intervention vs. 24 percent of patients (17/70) with objects in their rectum (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest single institution series of retained colorectal foreign bodies. Although foreign objects located in the sigmoid colon can be retrieved at the bedside, these cases are more likely to require operative intervention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4944241805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4944241805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10350-004-0676-4

DO - 10.1007/s10350-004-0676-4

M3 - Review article

VL - 47

SP - 1694

EP - 1698

JO - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

JF - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

SN - 0012-3706

IS - 10

ER -