Mechanisms of hernia recurrence after preperitoneal mesh repair: Traditional and laparoscopic

Anthony S. Lowham; Charles J. Filipi; Robert J. Fitzgibbons; Rene Stoppa; George E. Wantz; Edward L. Felix; W. Boyd Crafton

doi:10.1097/00000658-199704000-00012

Mechanisms of hernia recurrence after preperitoneal mesh repair: Traditional and laparoscopic

Anthony S. Lowham, Charles J. Filipi, Robert J. Fitzgibbons, Rene Stoppa, George E. Wantz, Edward L. Felix, W. Boyd Crafton

Department of Surgery

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

173 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The authors provide an assessment of mechanisms leading to hernia recurrence after laparoscopic and traditional preperitoneal herniorrhaphy to allow surgeons using either technique to achieve better results. Summary Background Data: The laparoscopic and traditional preperitoneal approaches to hernia repair are analogous in principle and outcome and have experienced a similar evolution over different time frames. The recurrence rate after preperitoneal herniorrhaphy should be low (

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	422-431
Number of pages	10
Journal	Annals of Surgery
Volume	225
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199704000-00012
State	Published - 1997

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Surgery

Access to Document

10.1097/00000658-199704000-00012

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Mechanisms of hernia recurrence after preperitoneal mesh repair: Traditional and laparoscopic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{961c43b670934c36bc6fe5a51b6cbbc1,

title = "Mechanisms of hernia recurrence after preperitoneal mesh repair: Traditional and laparoscopic",

abstract = "Objective: The authors provide an assessment of mechanisms leading to hernia recurrence after laparoscopic and traditional preperitoneal herniorrhaphy to allow surgeons using either technique to achieve better results. Summary Background Data: The laparoscopic and traditional preperitoneal approaches to hernia repair are analogous in principle and outcome and have experienced a similar evolution over different time frames. The recurrence rate after preperitoneal herniorrhaphy should be low (",

author = "Lowham, {Anthony S.} and Filipi, {Charles J.} and Fitzgibbons, {Robert J.} and Rene Stoppa and Wantz, {George E.} and Felix, {Edward L.} and Crafton, {W. Boyd}",

year = "1997",

doi = "10.1097/00000658-199704000-00012",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "225",

pages = "422--431",

journal = "Annals of Surgery",

issn = "0003-4932",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanisms of hernia recurrence after preperitoneal mesh repair

T2 - Traditional and laparoscopic

AU - Lowham, Anthony S.

AU - Filipi, Charles J.

AU - Fitzgibbons, Robert J.

AU - Stoppa, Rene

AU - Wantz, George E.

AU - Felix, Edward L.

AU - Crafton, W. Boyd

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Objective: The authors provide an assessment of mechanisms leading to hernia recurrence after laparoscopic and traditional preperitoneal herniorrhaphy to allow surgeons using either technique to achieve better results. Summary Background Data: The laparoscopic and traditional preperitoneal approaches to hernia repair are analogous in principle and outcome and have experienced a similar evolution over different time frames. The recurrence rate after preperitoneal herniorrhaphy should be low (

AB - Objective: The authors provide an assessment of mechanisms leading to hernia recurrence after laparoscopic and traditional preperitoneal herniorrhaphy to allow surgeons using either technique to achieve better results. Summary Background Data: The laparoscopic and traditional preperitoneal approaches to hernia repair are analogous in principle and outcome and have experienced a similar evolution over different time frames. The recurrence rate after preperitoneal herniorrhaphy should be low (

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031472263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031472263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00000658-199704000-00012

DO - 10.1097/00000658-199704000-00012

M3 - Article

C2 - 9114802

AN - SCOPUS:0031472263

VL - 225

SP - 422

EP - 431

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 4

ER -