Memory for sentences and prose

Levels-of-processing or transfer-appropriate-processing?

John A. Glover, Joan Rankin, Nancy Langner, Catherine Todero, Dale Dinnel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Four experiments were conducted in order to contrast the levels-of-processing perspective with the transfer-appropriate-processing perspective. Experiment 1 employed a within-groups design to contrast the effects of various types of questions at different positions on subjects' recognition of sentences. The results seemed to support the transfer-appropriate-processing perspective's predictions but were confounded by the form of design. Experiment 2 examined the same questions with a between-groups design, while Experiment 3 replicated Experiment 2 with the use of a free recall posttest. The results of both Experiments 2 and 3 seemed to support the predictions of the transfer-appropriate-processing perspective and disconfirm the predictions of the levels-of-processing framework. Experiment 4 extended the work to subjects' memory for paragraphs. The results of Experiment 4, however, did not match the pattern observed in Experiments 1–3 and, instead, seemed to bear out the predictions of the levels-of-processing perspective. The results are discussed in terms of the influence of experimental design, choice of study materials, choice of dependent variables, and their interaction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)215-234
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Literacy Research
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1985
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

experiment
choice of studies
Levels of Processing
Experiment
Prose
study materials
Group
Prediction
interaction

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Memory for sentences and prose : Levels-of-processing or transfer-appropriate-processing? / Glover, John A.; Rankin, Joan; Langner, Nancy; Todero, Catherine; Dinnel, Dale.

In: Journal of Literacy Research, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1985, p. 215-234.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Glover, John A. ; Rankin, Joan ; Langner, Nancy ; Todero, Catherine ; Dinnel, Dale. / Memory for sentences and prose : Levels-of-processing or transfer-appropriate-processing?. In: Journal of Literacy Research. 1985 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 215-234.
@article{1e0da937abfd49bd9b5dce33e55f15d5,
title = "Memory for sentences and prose: Levels-of-processing or transfer-appropriate-processing?",
abstract = "Four experiments were conducted in order to contrast the levels-of-processing perspective with the transfer-appropriate-processing perspective. Experiment 1 employed a within-groups design to contrast the effects of various types of questions at different positions on subjects' recognition of sentences. The results seemed to support the transfer-appropriate-processing perspective's predictions but were confounded by the form of design. Experiment 2 examined the same questions with a between-groups design, while Experiment 3 replicated Experiment 2 with the use of a free recall posttest. The results of both Experiments 2 and 3 seemed to support the predictions of the transfer-appropriate-processing perspective and disconfirm the predictions of the levels-of-processing framework. Experiment 4 extended the work to subjects' memory for paragraphs. The results of Experiment 4, however, did not match the pattern observed in Experiments 1–3 and, instead, seemed to bear out the predictions of the levels-of-processing perspective. The results are discussed in terms of the influence of experimental design, choice of study materials, choice of dependent variables, and their interaction.",
author = "Glover, {John A.} and Joan Rankin and Nancy Langner and Catherine Todero and Dale Dinnel",
year = "1985",
doi = "10.1080/10862968509547541",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "215--234",
journal = "Journal of Literacy Research",
issn = "1086-296X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Memory for sentences and prose

T2 - Levels-of-processing or transfer-appropriate-processing?

AU - Glover, John A.

AU - Rankin, Joan

AU - Langner, Nancy

AU - Todero, Catherine

AU - Dinnel, Dale

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - Four experiments were conducted in order to contrast the levels-of-processing perspective with the transfer-appropriate-processing perspective. Experiment 1 employed a within-groups design to contrast the effects of various types of questions at different positions on subjects' recognition of sentences. The results seemed to support the transfer-appropriate-processing perspective's predictions but were confounded by the form of design. Experiment 2 examined the same questions with a between-groups design, while Experiment 3 replicated Experiment 2 with the use of a free recall posttest. The results of both Experiments 2 and 3 seemed to support the predictions of the transfer-appropriate-processing perspective and disconfirm the predictions of the levels-of-processing framework. Experiment 4 extended the work to subjects' memory for paragraphs. The results of Experiment 4, however, did not match the pattern observed in Experiments 1–3 and, instead, seemed to bear out the predictions of the levels-of-processing perspective. The results are discussed in terms of the influence of experimental design, choice of study materials, choice of dependent variables, and their interaction.

AB - Four experiments were conducted in order to contrast the levels-of-processing perspective with the transfer-appropriate-processing perspective. Experiment 1 employed a within-groups design to contrast the effects of various types of questions at different positions on subjects' recognition of sentences. The results seemed to support the transfer-appropriate-processing perspective's predictions but were confounded by the form of design. Experiment 2 examined the same questions with a between-groups design, while Experiment 3 replicated Experiment 2 with the use of a free recall posttest. The results of both Experiments 2 and 3 seemed to support the predictions of the transfer-appropriate-processing perspective and disconfirm the predictions of the levels-of-processing framework. Experiment 4 extended the work to subjects' memory for paragraphs. The results of Experiment 4, however, did not match the pattern observed in Experiments 1–3 and, instead, seemed to bear out the predictions of the levels-of-processing perspective. The results are discussed in terms of the influence of experimental design, choice of study materials, choice of dependent variables, and their interaction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970302400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970302400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10862968509547541

DO - 10.1080/10862968509547541

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 215

EP - 234

JO - Journal of Literacy Research

JF - Journal of Literacy Research

SN - 1086-296X

IS - 3

ER -