Abstract
The authors use the meta-analytic approach to compare the safety and efficacy of monotherapies versus combination therapy in the treatment of essential hypertension. Results provide clinicians and pharmacists with a wider perspective when making prescribing decisions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 685-695 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | P and T |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 12 |
State | Published - 1996 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Pharmacology
Cite this
Meta-analysis of bisoprolol/HCTZ versus twelve monotherapies. / Ryschon, K. L.; Mohiuddin, Syed M.; Hilleman, Daniel E.
In: P and T, Vol. 21, No. 12, 1996, p. 685-695.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Meta-analysis of bisoprolol/HCTZ versus twelve monotherapies
AU - Ryschon, K. L.
AU - Mohiuddin, Syed M.
AU - Hilleman, Daniel E.
PY - 1996
Y1 - 1996
N2 - The authors use the meta-analytic approach to compare the safety and efficacy of monotherapies versus combination therapy in the treatment of essential hypertension. Results provide clinicians and pharmacists with a wider perspective when making prescribing decisions.
AB - The authors use the meta-analytic approach to compare the safety and efficacy of monotherapies versus combination therapy in the treatment of essential hypertension. Results provide clinicians and pharmacists with a wider perspective when making prescribing decisions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030481886&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030481886&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:0030481886
VL - 21
SP - 685
EP - 695
JO - P and T
JF - P and T
SN - 1052-1372
IS - 12
ER -