Molecular dynamics simulations of epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor-α structures in water

Charles R. Watts, Sándor Lovas, Richard F. Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AMBER v. 4.1 force field in 1.5 ns NPT molecular dynamics simulations of murine epidermal growth factor (mEGF), human epidermal growth factor (hEGF), and human transforming growth factor-α (hTGF-α) structures with explicit TIP3P solvation were used to investigate differences in backbone stability, changes in secondary structure, interdomain flexibility, and weakly polar interactions. Backbone root mean square deviations of sections of each peptide show that the most stable regions in mEGF and hEGF are the A-, B-, and C-loops, whereas the most stable regions in hTGF-α are the A- and B- loops. The secondary structure in the B-loops of mEGF and hEGF differ significantly from the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structures of mEGF and hEGF. The position and type of turns in the B-loop of mEGF and hEGF increase the interstrand distance of the antiparallel β-sheets thereby disrupting their structure. The interdomain flexibility of simulated hTGF-α structure is greater than in either mEGF or hEGF. The Φ, ψ dihedrals of hTGF-α occupy two distinct populations of phase space corresponding to either a C7/(eq) or an α-helical conformation. This change in dihedral angle is stabilized by Phe15 with Arg42 and Phe17 with Arg42 N-π weakly polar interactions that are present only in hTGF-α but not in mEGF or hEGF.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)396-407
Number of pages12
JournalProteins: Structure, Function and Genetics
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 15 1998

Fingerprint

Transforming Growth Factors
Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Epidermal Growth Factor
Molecular dynamics
Water
Computer simulation
Solvation
Dihedral angle
Conformations
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Genetics
  • Structural Biology
  • Biochemistry

Cite this

Molecular dynamics simulations of epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor-α structures in water. / Watts, Charles R.; Lovas, Sándor; Murphy, Richard F.

In: Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics, Vol. 33, No. 3, 15.11.1998, p. 396-407.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d74279bbf7104b15bb1ebf6c8a914216,
title = "Molecular dynamics simulations of epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor-α structures in water",
abstract = "AMBER v. 4.1 force field in 1.5 ns NPT molecular dynamics simulations of murine epidermal growth factor (mEGF), human epidermal growth factor (hEGF), and human transforming growth factor-α (hTGF-α) structures with explicit TIP3P solvation were used to investigate differences in backbone stability, changes in secondary structure, interdomain flexibility, and weakly polar interactions. Backbone root mean square deviations of sections of each peptide show that the most stable regions in mEGF and hEGF are the A-, B-, and C-loops, whereas the most stable regions in hTGF-α are the A- and B- loops. The secondary structure in the B-loops of mEGF and hEGF differ significantly from the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structures of mEGF and hEGF. The position and type of turns in the B-loop of mEGF and hEGF increase the interstrand distance of the antiparallel β-sheets thereby disrupting their structure. The interdomain flexibility of simulated hTGF-α structure is greater than in either mEGF or hEGF. The Φ, ψ dihedrals of hTGF-α occupy two distinct populations of phase space corresponding to either a C7/(eq) or an α-helical conformation. This change in dihedral angle is stabilized by Phe15 with Arg42 and Phe17 with Arg42 N-π weakly polar interactions that are present only in hTGF-α but not in mEGF or hEGF.",
author = "Watts, {Charles R.} and S{\'a}ndor Lovas and Murphy, {Richard F.}",
year = "1998",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19981115)33:3<396::AID-PROT8>3.0.CO;2-I",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "396--407",
journal = "Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics",
issn = "0887-3585",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Molecular dynamics simulations of epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor-α structures in water

AU - Watts, Charles R.

AU - Lovas, Sándor

AU - Murphy, Richard F.

PY - 1998/11/15

Y1 - 1998/11/15

N2 - AMBER v. 4.1 force field in 1.5 ns NPT molecular dynamics simulations of murine epidermal growth factor (mEGF), human epidermal growth factor (hEGF), and human transforming growth factor-α (hTGF-α) structures with explicit TIP3P solvation were used to investigate differences in backbone stability, changes in secondary structure, interdomain flexibility, and weakly polar interactions. Backbone root mean square deviations of sections of each peptide show that the most stable regions in mEGF and hEGF are the A-, B-, and C-loops, whereas the most stable regions in hTGF-α are the A- and B- loops. The secondary structure in the B-loops of mEGF and hEGF differ significantly from the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structures of mEGF and hEGF. The position and type of turns in the B-loop of mEGF and hEGF increase the interstrand distance of the antiparallel β-sheets thereby disrupting their structure. The interdomain flexibility of simulated hTGF-α structure is greater than in either mEGF or hEGF. The Φ, ψ dihedrals of hTGF-α occupy two distinct populations of phase space corresponding to either a C7/(eq) or an α-helical conformation. This change in dihedral angle is stabilized by Phe15 with Arg42 and Phe17 with Arg42 N-π weakly polar interactions that are present only in hTGF-α but not in mEGF or hEGF.

AB - AMBER v. 4.1 force field in 1.5 ns NPT molecular dynamics simulations of murine epidermal growth factor (mEGF), human epidermal growth factor (hEGF), and human transforming growth factor-α (hTGF-α) structures with explicit TIP3P solvation were used to investigate differences in backbone stability, changes in secondary structure, interdomain flexibility, and weakly polar interactions. Backbone root mean square deviations of sections of each peptide show that the most stable regions in mEGF and hEGF are the A-, B-, and C-loops, whereas the most stable regions in hTGF-α are the A- and B- loops. The secondary structure in the B-loops of mEGF and hEGF differ significantly from the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structures of mEGF and hEGF. The position and type of turns in the B-loop of mEGF and hEGF increase the interstrand distance of the antiparallel β-sheets thereby disrupting their structure. The interdomain flexibility of simulated hTGF-α structure is greater than in either mEGF or hEGF. The Φ, ψ dihedrals of hTGF-α occupy two distinct populations of phase space corresponding to either a C7/(eq) or an α-helical conformation. This change in dihedral angle is stabilized by Phe15 with Arg42 and Phe17 with Arg42 N-π weakly polar interactions that are present only in hTGF-α but not in mEGF or hEGF.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032533398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032533398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19981115)33:3<396::AID-PROT8>3.0.CO;2-I

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19981115)33:3<396::AID-PROT8>3.0.CO;2-I

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 396

EP - 407

JO - Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

JF - Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

SN - 0887-3585

IS - 3

ER -