Natural Law and Perspectivism: A Case for Plural Definitions of Objective Morality

Todd A. Salzman; Michael G. Lawler

doi:10.1177/0021140016674275

Natural Law and Perspectivism: A Case for Plural Definitions of Objective Morality

Todd A. Salzman, Michael G. Lawler

Department of Theology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

This essay is about Catholic theological ethics and an explanation of competing answers to questions raised by Catholic ethicists. The core of the essay is a presentation of the cognitional theory of perspectivism as a counter to the concerns of relativism raised by Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI. The essay considers the foundational theory of natural law and contrasts its 19th-century neo-Thomist understanding with Aquinas's own understanding of natural law as reason. As a concrete illustration of the theories of perspectivism and natural law, the essay considers the question of contraception and its competing Catholic answers.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	3-18
Number of pages	16
Journal	Irish Theological Quarterly
Volume	82
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0021140016674275
State	Published - Feb 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Religious studies

Access to Document

10.1177/0021140016674275

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Natural Law and Perspectivism: A Case for Plural Definitions of Objective Morality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{ec0e7823f43d4f049bf1780d47f971c0,

title = "Natural Law and Perspectivism: A Case for Plural Definitions of Objective Morality",

abstract = "This essay is about Catholic theological ethics and an explanation of competing answers to questions raised by Catholic ethicists. The core of the essay is a presentation of the cognitional theory of perspectivism as a counter to the concerns of relativism raised by Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI. The essay considers the foundational theory of natural law and contrasts its 19th-century neo-Thomist understanding with Aquinas's own understanding of natural law as reason. As a concrete illustration of the theories of perspectivism and natural law, the essay considers the question of contraception and its competing Catholic answers.",

author = "Salzman, {Todd A.} and Lawler, {Michael G.}",

year = "2017",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1177/0021140016674275",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "82",

pages = "3--18",

journal = "Irish Theological Quarterly",

issn = "0021-1400",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Natural Law and Perspectivism

T2 - A Case for Plural Definitions of Objective Morality

AU - Salzman, Todd A.

AU - Lawler, Michael G.

PY - 2017/2

Y1 - 2017/2

N2 - This essay is about Catholic theological ethics and an explanation of competing answers to questions raised by Catholic ethicists. The core of the essay is a presentation of the cognitional theory of perspectivism as a counter to the concerns of relativism raised by Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI. The essay considers the foundational theory of natural law and contrasts its 19th-century neo-Thomist understanding with Aquinas's own understanding of natural law as reason. As a concrete illustration of the theories of perspectivism and natural law, the essay considers the question of contraception and its competing Catholic answers.

AB - This essay is about Catholic theological ethics and an explanation of competing answers to questions raised by Catholic ethicists. The core of the essay is a presentation of the cognitional theory of perspectivism as a counter to the concerns of relativism raised by Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI. The essay considers the foundational theory of natural law and contrasts its 19th-century neo-Thomist understanding with Aquinas's own understanding of natural law as reason. As a concrete illustration of the theories of perspectivism and natural law, the essay considers the question of contraception and its competing Catholic answers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009987955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009987955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0021140016674275

DO - 10.1177/0021140016674275

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85009987955

VL - 82

SP - 3

EP - 18

JO - Irish Theological Quarterly

JF - Irish Theological Quarterly

SN - 0021-1400

IS - 1

ER -

Natural Law and Perspectivism: A Case for Plural Definitions of Objective Morality

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this