Need for caution in using the perceived usefulness/ease of use instruments for decision making

A multi-group analysis of factorial invariance

William J. Doll, Anthony Hendrickson, Xiaodong Deng

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are important instruments for evaluating information system applications and predicting usage. Using a sample of 902 respondents, this research conducts: (1) a confirmatory analysis to assess the validity and reliability of the original instrument proposed by Davis, and (2) a multi-group invariance analysis to assess the equivalence of these instruments across sub-groups based on type of application, experience with computing, and gender. The results provide strong support for the validity and reliability of Davis's instruments. With exemptions for word processing applications and users with no prior computing experience, this research provides evidence that these instruments can be considered robustness across spread sheet, database, and graphic applications.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute
Editors Anon
PublisherDecis Sci Inst
Pages750-752
Number of pages3
Volume2
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes
EventProceedings of the 1997 Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. Part 1 (of 3) - San Diego, CA, USA
Duration: Nov 22 1997Nov 25 1997

Other

OtherProceedings of the 1997 Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. Part 1 (of 3)
CitySan Diego, CA, USA
Period11/22/9711/25/97

Fingerprint

Invariance
Decision making
Word processing
Information systems
Multi-group analysis
Ease of use
Perceived usefulness

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Management Information Systems
  • Hardware and Architecture

Cite this

Doll, W. J., Hendrickson, A., & Deng, X. (1997). Need for caution in using the perceived usefulness/ease of use instruments for decision making: A multi-group analysis of factorial invariance. In Anon (Ed.), Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute (Vol. 2, pp. 750-752). Decis Sci Inst.

Need for caution in using the perceived usefulness/ease of use instruments for decision making : A multi-group analysis of factorial invariance. / Doll, William J.; Hendrickson, Anthony; Deng, Xiaodong.

Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. ed. / Anon. Vol. 2 Decis Sci Inst, 1997. p. 750-752.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Doll, WJ, Hendrickson, A & Deng, X 1997, Need for caution in using the perceived usefulness/ease of use instruments for decision making: A multi-group analysis of factorial invariance. in Anon (ed.), Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. vol. 2, Decis Sci Inst, pp. 750-752, Proceedings of the 1997 Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. Part 1 (of 3), San Diego, CA, USA, 11/22/97.
Doll WJ, Hendrickson A, Deng X. Need for caution in using the perceived usefulness/ease of use instruments for decision making: A multi-group analysis of factorial invariance. In Anon, editor, Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. Vol. 2. Decis Sci Inst. 1997. p. 750-752
Doll, William J. ; Hendrickson, Anthony ; Deng, Xiaodong. / Need for caution in using the perceived usefulness/ease of use instruments for decision making : A multi-group analysis of factorial invariance. Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. editor / Anon. Vol. 2 Decis Sci Inst, 1997. pp. 750-752
@inproceedings{362141b100524d1fb1eff4d7201786e5,
title = "Need for caution in using the perceived usefulness/ease of use instruments for decision making: A multi-group analysis of factorial invariance",
abstract = "Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are important instruments for evaluating information system applications and predicting usage. Using a sample of 902 respondents, this research conducts: (1) a confirmatory analysis to assess the validity and reliability of the original instrument proposed by Davis, and (2) a multi-group invariance analysis to assess the equivalence of these instruments across sub-groups based on type of application, experience with computing, and gender. The results provide strong support for the validity and reliability of Davis's instruments. With exemptions for word processing applications and users with no prior computing experience, this research provides evidence that these instruments can be considered robustness across spread sheet, database, and graphic applications.",
author = "Doll, {William J.} and Anthony Hendrickson and Xiaodong Deng",
year = "1997",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "750--752",
editor = "Anon",
booktitle = "Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute",
publisher = "Decis Sci Inst",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Need for caution in using the perceived usefulness/ease of use instruments for decision making

T2 - A multi-group analysis of factorial invariance

AU - Doll, William J.

AU - Hendrickson, Anthony

AU - Deng, Xiaodong

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are important instruments for evaluating information system applications and predicting usage. Using a sample of 902 respondents, this research conducts: (1) a confirmatory analysis to assess the validity and reliability of the original instrument proposed by Davis, and (2) a multi-group invariance analysis to assess the equivalence of these instruments across sub-groups based on type of application, experience with computing, and gender. The results provide strong support for the validity and reliability of Davis's instruments. With exemptions for word processing applications and users with no prior computing experience, this research provides evidence that these instruments can be considered robustness across spread sheet, database, and graphic applications.

AB - Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are important instruments for evaluating information system applications and predicting usage. Using a sample of 902 respondents, this research conducts: (1) a confirmatory analysis to assess the validity and reliability of the original instrument proposed by Davis, and (2) a multi-group invariance analysis to assess the equivalence of these instruments across sub-groups based on type of application, experience with computing, and gender. The results provide strong support for the validity and reliability of Davis's instruments. With exemptions for word processing applications and users with no prior computing experience, this research provides evidence that these instruments can be considered robustness across spread sheet, database, and graphic applications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031313951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031313951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 2

SP - 750

EP - 752

BT - Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute

A2 - Anon, null

PB - Decis Sci Inst

ER -