Need for caution in using the perceived usefulness/ease of use instruments for decision making: A multi-group analysis of factorial invariance

William J. Doll; Anthony Hendrickson; Xiaodong Deng

Need for caution in using the perceived usefulness/ease of use instruments for decision making: A multi-group analysis of factorial invariance

William J. Doll, Anthony Hendrickson, Xiaodong Deng

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are important instruments for evaluating information system applications and predicting usage. Using a sample of 902 respondents, this research conducts: (1) a confirmatory analysis to assess the validity and reliability of the original instrument proposed by Davis, and (2) a multi-group invariance analysis to assess the equivalence of these instruments across sub-groups based on type of application, experience with computing, and gender. The results provide strong support for the validity and reliability of Davis's instruments. With exemptions for word processing applications and users with no prior computing experience, this research provides evidence that these instruments can be considered robustness across spread sheet, database, and graphic applications.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute
Editors	Anon
Publisher	Decis Sci Inst
Pages	750-752
Number of pages	3
Volume	2
State	Published - 1997
Externally published	Yes
Event	Proceedings of the 1997 Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. Part 1 (of 3) - San Diego, CA, USA Duration: Nov 22 1997 → Nov 25 1997

Other

Other	Proceedings of the 1997 Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. Part 1 (of 3)
City	San Diego, CA, USA
Period	11/22/97 → 11/25/97

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Management Information Systems
Hardware and Architecture

Access to Document

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Need for caution in using the perceived usefulness/ease of use instruments for decision making: A multi-group analysis of factorial invariance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Doll, W. J., Hendrickson, A., & Deng, X. (1997). Need for caution in using the perceived usefulness/ease of use instruments for decision making: A multi-group analysis of factorial invariance. In Anon (Ed.), Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute (Vol. 2, pp. 750-752). Decis Sci Inst.

Need for caution in using the perceived usefulness/ease of use instruments for decision making : A multi-group analysis of factorial invariance. / Doll, William J.; Hendrickson, Anthony; Deng, Xiaodong.

Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. ed. / Anon. Vol. 2 Decis Sci Inst, 1997. p. 750-752.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Doll, WJ, Hendrickson, A & Deng, X 1997, Need for caution in using the perceived usefulness/ease of use instruments for decision making: A multi-group analysis of factorial invariance. in Anon (ed.), Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. vol. 2, Decis Sci Inst, pp. 750-752, Proceedings of the 1997 Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. Part 1 (of 3), San Diego, CA, USA, 11/22/97.

@inproceedings{362141b100524d1fb1eff4d7201786e5,

title = "Need for caution in using the perceived usefulness/ease of use instruments for decision making: A multi-group analysis of factorial invariance",

abstract = "Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are important instruments for evaluating information system applications and predicting usage. Using a sample of 902 respondents, this research conducts: (1) a confirmatory analysis to assess the validity and reliability of the original instrument proposed by Davis, and (2) a multi-group invariance analysis to assess the equivalence of these instruments across sub-groups based on type of application, experience with computing, and gender. The results provide strong support for the validity and reliability of Davis's instruments. With exemptions for word processing applications and users with no prior computing experience, this research provides evidence that these instruments can be considered robustness across spread sheet, database, and graphic applications.",

author = "Doll, {William J.} and Anthony Hendrickson and Xiaodong Deng",

year = "1997",

language = "English",

volume = "2",

pages = "750--752",

editor = "Anon",

booktitle = "Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute",

publisher = "Decis Sci Inst",

note = "null ; Conference date: 22-11-1997 Through 25-11-1997",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Need for caution in using the perceived usefulness/ease of use instruments for decision making

AU - Doll, William J.

AU - Hendrickson, Anthony

AU - Deng, Xiaodong

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are important instruments for evaluating information system applications and predicting usage. Using a sample of 902 respondents, this research conducts: (1) a confirmatory analysis to assess the validity and reliability of the original instrument proposed by Davis, and (2) a multi-group invariance analysis to assess the equivalence of these instruments across sub-groups based on type of application, experience with computing, and gender. The results provide strong support for the validity and reliability of Davis's instruments. With exemptions for word processing applications and users with no prior computing experience, this research provides evidence that these instruments can be considered robustness across spread sheet, database, and graphic applications.

AB - Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are important instruments for evaluating information system applications and predicting usage. Using a sample of 902 respondents, this research conducts: (1) a confirmatory analysis to assess the validity and reliability of the original instrument proposed by Davis, and (2) a multi-group invariance analysis to assess the equivalence of these instruments across sub-groups based on type of application, experience with computing, and gender. The results provide strong support for the validity and reliability of Davis's instruments. With exemptions for word processing applications and users with no prior computing experience, this research provides evidence that these instruments can be considered robustness across spread sheet, database, and graphic applications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031313951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031313951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:0031313951

VL - 2

SP - 750

EP - 752

BT - Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute

A2 - Anon, null

PB - Decis Sci Inst

Y2 - 22 November 1997 through 25 November 1997

ER -