Decompensated heart failure accounts for approximately 1 million hospitalizations in the USA each year with an estimated cost of US$11,000 per hospitalization. Despite this prevalence and cost burden, relatively few therapies for decompensated heart failure have been developed over the past 30 years. Although once the mainstay of treatment of decompensated heart failure, the use of positive inotropic agents has fallen into disfavor. Although these agents improve hemodynamics and ejection fraction, there is evidence that the positive inotropes increase the risk of adverse clinical outcomes and mortality. Nesiritide is a naturetic peptide that produces balance vasodilation, inhibits sympathetic nervous system activity, and promotes diuresis and naturesis. At the time the drug received Food and Drug Administration approval for marketing in the USA, it had been shown to produce hemodynamic improvements to an extent greater than placebo or nitroglycerin. However, evidence of benefit in terms of clinical improvement and other outcomes was lacking. Recent trials have found that nesiritide reduces hospital length of stay (although not statistically significant in all trials) and healthcare resource utilization in patients admitted to hospital with decompensated heart failure. In a randomized, controlled trial, nesiritide given in the emergency room reduced hospital admissions for heart failure compared with placebo/usual care. Prelimary data from an outpatient intermittent infusion trial of nesiritide found that patients receiving nesiritide had fewer hospital admissions than patients randomized to standard care. There is currently little objective evidence that therapies used routinely in the management of patients with decompensated heart failure are associated with improved outcomes. Data with positive inotropic agents suggest that they do more harm than good. There is a growing body of evidence that nesiritide is associated with improvements in clinical outcomes in decompensated heart failure including fewer complications, less healthcare resource utilization, and lower costs when compared with standard therapy. Despite this evidence, larger, prospective trials demonstrating the impact of nesiritide on the costs and complications in decompensated heart failure are needed.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||7|
|Journal||Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research|
|State||Published - Feb 1 2005|
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Health Policy
- Pharmacology (medical)