Occupational therapists' responses to practice errors in physical rehabilitation settings

Linda Scheirton, Keli Mu, Helene Lohman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Errors occur in all health care professions. Practice errors, however, have not been systematically examined in occupational therapy. The purpose of this study was to examine occupational therapists' responses to practice errors in physical rehabilitation settings. METHOD. A qualitative focus group research method was used in this study and a total of 35 occupational therapists from four different states who had practice experience in physical rehabilitation settings participated in four focus groups. Focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim and analyzed by two investigators of the study. Qualitative software program, NUD*IST Vivo was used to aid the data analysis process. RESULTS. Five major themes were generated from the data regarding practice errors, which included (1) Concept of practice error: It is against our standards; (2) Perceived causes of practice error: Not just an individual matter; (3) Emotional responses: I felt horrible; (4) Impact on practice: Doing things differently; and (5) Management of practice error: Being honest and taking initiative. Occupational therapists perceived practice error from a broad perspective and identified physical and psychosocial issues as practice error. CONCLUSION. Most practice errors described by participants appeared to be preventable. Despite the tremendous emotional distress in reaction to making an error, participants valued the learning in the experience and made constructive practice changes. Findings of the study have implications for current educational training programs and practice such as the development of clinical reasoning related to patient safety and assertiveness training for hierarchical situations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)307-314
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy
Volume57
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 2003

Fingerprint

Focus Groups
Rehabilitation
Assertiveness
Health Occupations
Occupational Therapy
Practice Management
Patient Safety
Software
Research Personnel
Learning
Delivery of Health Care
Education
Research
Occupational Therapists

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Occupational therapists' responses to practice errors in physical rehabilitation settings. / Scheirton, Linda; Mu, Keli; Lohman, Helene.

In: American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 57, No. 3, 05.2003, p. 307-314.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{0d9ac3ef6b0a4d9eb5a529915f51f391,
title = "Occupational therapists' responses to practice errors in physical rehabilitation settings",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. Errors occur in all health care professions. Practice errors, however, have not been systematically examined in occupational therapy. The purpose of this study was to examine occupational therapists' responses to practice errors in physical rehabilitation settings. METHOD. A qualitative focus group research method was used in this study and a total of 35 occupational therapists from four different states who had practice experience in physical rehabilitation settings participated in four focus groups. Focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim and analyzed by two investigators of the study. Qualitative software program, NUD*IST Vivo was used to aid the data analysis process. RESULTS. Five major themes were generated from the data regarding practice errors, which included (1) Concept of practice error: It is against our standards; (2) Perceived causes of practice error: Not just an individual matter; (3) Emotional responses: I felt horrible; (4) Impact on practice: Doing things differently; and (5) Management of practice error: Being honest and taking initiative. Occupational therapists perceived practice error from a broad perspective and identified physical and psychosocial issues as practice error. CONCLUSION. Most practice errors described by participants appeared to be preventable. Despite the tremendous emotional distress in reaction to making an error, participants valued the learning in the experience and made constructive practice changes. Findings of the study have implications for current educational training programs and practice such as the development of clinical reasoning related to patient safety and assertiveness training for hierarchical situations.",
author = "Linda Scheirton and Keli Mu and Helene Lohman",
year = "2003",
month = "5",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "307--314",
journal = "American Journal of Occupational Therapy",
issn = "0272-9490",
publisher = "American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Occupational therapists' responses to practice errors in physical rehabilitation settings

AU - Scheirton, Linda

AU - Mu, Keli

AU - Lohman, Helene

PY - 2003/5

Y1 - 2003/5

N2 - OBJECTIVE. Errors occur in all health care professions. Practice errors, however, have not been systematically examined in occupational therapy. The purpose of this study was to examine occupational therapists' responses to practice errors in physical rehabilitation settings. METHOD. A qualitative focus group research method was used in this study and a total of 35 occupational therapists from four different states who had practice experience in physical rehabilitation settings participated in four focus groups. Focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim and analyzed by two investigators of the study. Qualitative software program, NUD*IST Vivo was used to aid the data analysis process. RESULTS. Five major themes were generated from the data regarding practice errors, which included (1) Concept of practice error: It is against our standards; (2) Perceived causes of practice error: Not just an individual matter; (3) Emotional responses: I felt horrible; (4) Impact on practice: Doing things differently; and (5) Management of practice error: Being honest and taking initiative. Occupational therapists perceived practice error from a broad perspective and identified physical and psychosocial issues as practice error. CONCLUSION. Most practice errors described by participants appeared to be preventable. Despite the tremendous emotional distress in reaction to making an error, participants valued the learning in the experience and made constructive practice changes. Findings of the study have implications for current educational training programs and practice such as the development of clinical reasoning related to patient safety and assertiveness training for hierarchical situations.

AB - OBJECTIVE. Errors occur in all health care professions. Practice errors, however, have not been systematically examined in occupational therapy. The purpose of this study was to examine occupational therapists' responses to practice errors in physical rehabilitation settings. METHOD. A qualitative focus group research method was used in this study and a total of 35 occupational therapists from four different states who had practice experience in physical rehabilitation settings participated in four focus groups. Focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim and analyzed by two investigators of the study. Qualitative software program, NUD*IST Vivo was used to aid the data analysis process. RESULTS. Five major themes were generated from the data regarding practice errors, which included (1) Concept of practice error: It is against our standards; (2) Perceived causes of practice error: Not just an individual matter; (3) Emotional responses: I felt horrible; (4) Impact on practice: Doing things differently; and (5) Management of practice error: Being honest and taking initiative. Occupational therapists perceived practice error from a broad perspective and identified physical and psychosocial issues as practice error. CONCLUSION. Most practice errors described by participants appeared to be preventable. Despite the tremendous emotional distress in reaction to making an error, participants valued the learning in the experience and made constructive practice changes. Findings of the study have implications for current educational training programs and practice such as the development of clinical reasoning related to patient safety and assertiveness training for hierarchical situations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041920889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041920889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 57

SP - 307

EP - 314

JO - American Journal of Occupational Therapy

JF - American Journal of Occupational Therapy

SN - 0272-9490

IS - 3

ER -