Abstract
This article discusses the concepts of omission and commission as marketplace trauma within the theoretical framework of cultural trauma theory. The authors identify the meanings and processes of the people, activities, and outcomes likely when marketplace omission and/or commission occur, as well as the factors that elevate these events from collective to cultural trauma. The authors use concepts of social structure, collective practices, and collective discourse in exploring the interConnectivity of marketplace traumas and their actors, victims, and consequences (i.e., constrained consumption, damaged marketing systems, and institutional privilege). They then leverage the same framework to propose further research and corrective actions.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 280-291 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Journal of Public Policy and Marketing |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1 2016 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Business and International Management
- Economics and Econometrics
- Marketing
Cite this
Omission and Commission as Marketplace Trauma. / Bennett, Aronté Marie; Menzel Baker, Stacey; Cross, Samantha; James, J. P.; Bartholomew, Gregory; Ekpo, Akon E.; Henderson, Geraldine Rosa; Hutton, Martina; Khare, Apoorv; Roy, Abhijit; Stovall, Tony; Taylor, Charles Ray.
In: Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 35, No. 2, 01.09.2016, p. 280-291.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Omission and Commission as Marketplace Trauma
AU - Bennett, Aronté Marie
AU - Menzel Baker, Stacey
AU - Cross, Samantha
AU - James, J. P.
AU - Bartholomew, Gregory
AU - Ekpo, Akon E.
AU - Henderson, Geraldine Rosa
AU - Hutton, Martina
AU - Khare, Apoorv
AU - Roy, Abhijit
AU - Stovall, Tony
AU - Taylor, Charles Ray
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - This article discusses the concepts of omission and commission as marketplace trauma within the theoretical framework of cultural trauma theory. The authors identify the meanings and processes of the people, activities, and outcomes likely when marketplace omission and/or commission occur, as well as the factors that elevate these events from collective to cultural trauma. The authors use concepts of social structure, collective practices, and collective discourse in exploring the interConnectivity of marketplace traumas and their actors, victims, and consequences (i.e., constrained consumption, damaged marketing systems, and institutional privilege). They then leverage the same framework to propose further research and corrective actions.
AB - This article discusses the concepts of omission and commission as marketplace trauma within the theoretical framework of cultural trauma theory. The authors identify the meanings and processes of the people, activities, and outcomes likely when marketplace omission and/or commission occur, as well as the factors that elevate these events from collective to cultural trauma. The authors use concepts of social structure, collective practices, and collective discourse in exploring the interConnectivity of marketplace traumas and their actors, victims, and consequences (i.e., constrained consumption, damaged marketing systems, and institutional privilege). They then leverage the same framework to propose further research and corrective actions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009181927&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009181927&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1509/jppm.15.149
DO - 10.1509/jppm.15.149
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85009181927
VL - 35
SP - 280
EP - 291
JO - Journal of Public Policy and Marketing
JF - Journal of Public Policy and Marketing
SN - 0748-6766
IS - 2
ER -