Onstage or behind the scenes? Relative learning benefits of simulation role-play and design

Daniel Druckman, Noam Ebner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, the authors report the results of two experiments that explored hypotheses about the relative learning advantages of role-play and scenario design. The experiments were conducted with similar student populations in Australia and Israel. Using a matched-pairs design, participants were randomly assigned to design and role-play conditions. They worked on their tasks following an hour-long lecture on three negotiation concepts: alternatives, time pressure, and negotiating power. A lecture-only control group was implemented in the Australian experiment. In both experiments, designers, working "behind the scenes," indicated better concept learning in the short run than their role-play counterparts performing "onstage," as well as in comparison with the control group. They showed better understanding of the way the concepts are related and retained the learning gains over time. Moreover, the designers were at least as motivated as role-players and controls and, for the Israel participants, showed more motivation. The results, favoring designers, spread widely across the various questions, asked immediately after the experience and 1 week later: 86% of the answers given favored designers in terms of direction; 52% of these were statistically significant. Implications are discussed for explanatory mechanisms, programmatic research, and teaching/training approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)465-497
Number of pages33
JournalSimulation and Gaming
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Experiments
Teaching
Students
Role play
Simulation
Experiment
Israel
Time pressure
Negotiating
Short-run
Scenarios

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Onstage or behind the scenes? Relative learning benefits of simulation role-play and design. / Druckman, Daniel; Ebner, Noam.

In: Simulation and Gaming, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2008, p. 465-497.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c20ae922675247dfaac0ae3fb41aca5a,
title = "Onstage or behind the scenes? Relative learning benefits of simulation role-play and design",
abstract = "In this article, the authors report the results of two experiments that explored hypotheses about the relative learning advantages of role-play and scenario design. The experiments were conducted with similar student populations in Australia and Israel. Using a matched-pairs design, participants were randomly assigned to design and role-play conditions. They worked on their tasks following an hour-long lecture on three negotiation concepts: alternatives, time pressure, and negotiating power. A lecture-only control group was implemented in the Australian experiment. In both experiments, designers, working {"}behind the scenes,{"} indicated better concept learning in the short run than their role-play counterparts performing {"}onstage,{"} as well as in comparison with the control group. They showed better understanding of the way the concepts are related and retained the learning gains over time. Moreover, the designers were at least as motivated as role-players and controls and, for the Israel participants, showed more motivation. The results, favoring designers, spread widely across the various questions, asked immediately after the experience and 1 week later: 86{\%} of the answers given favored designers in terms of direction; 52{\%} of these were statistically significant. Implications are discussed for explanatory mechanisms, programmatic research, and teaching/training approaches.",
author = "Daniel Druckman and Noam Ebner",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1177/1046878107311377",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "465--497",
journal = "Simulation and Gaming",
issn = "1046-8781",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Onstage or behind the scenes? Relative learning benefits of simulation role-play and design

AU - Druckman, Daniel

AU - Ebner, Noam

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - In this article, the authors report the results of two experiments that explored hypotheses about the relative learning advantages of role-play and scenario design. The experiments were conducted with similar student populations in Australia and Israel. Using a matched-pairs design, participants were randomly assigned to design and role-play conditions. They worked on their tasks following an hour-long lecture on three negotiation concepts: alternatives, time pressure, and negotiating power. A lecture-only control group was implemented in the Australian experiment. In both experiments, designers, working "behind the scenes," indicated better concept learning in the short run than their role-play counterparts performing "onstage," as well as in comparison with the control group. They showed better understanding of the way the concepts are related and retained the learning gains over time. Moreover, the designers were at least as motivated as role-players and controls and, for the Israel participants, showed more motivation. The results, favoring designers, spread widely across the various questions, asked immediately after the experience and 1 week later: 86% of the answers given favored designers in terms of direction; 52% of these were statistically significant. Implications are discussed for explanatory mechanisms, programmatic research, and teaching/training approaches.

AB - In this article, the authors report the results of two experiments that explored hypotheses about the relative learning advantages of role-play and scenario design. The experiments were conducted with similar student populations in Australia and Israel. Using a matched-pairs design, participants were randomly assigned to design and role-play conditions. They worked on their tasks following an hour-long lecture on three negotiation concepts: alternatives, time pressure, and negotiating power. A lecture-only control group was implemented in the Australian experiment. In both experiments, designers, working "behind the scenes," indicated better concept learning in the short run than their role-play counterparts performing "onstage," as well as in comparison with the control group. They showed better understanding of the way the concepts are related and retained the learning gains over time. Moreover, the designers were at least as motivated as role-players and controls and, for the Israel participants, showed more motivation. The results, favoring designers, spread widely across the various questions, asked immediately after the experience and 1 week later: 86% of the answers given favored designers in terms of direction; 52% of these were statistically significant. Implications are discussed for explanatory mechanisms, programmatic research, and teaching/training approaches.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56049125303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56049125303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1046878107311377

DO - 10.1177/1046878107311377

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 465

EP - 497

JO - Simulation and Gaming

JF - Simulation and Gaming

SN - 1046-8781

IS - 4

ER -