Abstract
Family scholars have yet to explore substantially the day–to–day interactions of stepfamily systems. Our focus was on the everyday interactions of parent teams, adults who are co–parenting within different stepfamily households, describing the characteristics of their communication. Twenty–two parents, stepparents, and partners (N = 22) kept diaries for two weeks, each time they interacted with an adult in the other household. Results detail the frequency, timing, location, and length of interactions; initiator, channel, and topics; and reasons for interaction. Interactions were short, everyday encounters rather than extended, planned meetings. The majority of the interactions were via telephone, followed by face–to–face and electronic mail. Participants cited convenience and proximity as reasons for choosing these channels. The majority of topics discussed involved issues surrounding the children, involved little conflict, and adults were moderately satisfied with the interactions. Results suggest that these parent teams had achieved a state of equilibrium and developed ways to interact that worked reasonably well.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 93-111 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | International Journal of Phytoremediation |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2003 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Environmental Chemistry
- Pollution
- Plant Science
Cite this
“Parent teams” and the everyday interactions of co–parenting in stepfamilies. / Braithwaite, Dawn O.; McBride, M. Chad; Schrodt, Paul.
In: International Journal of Phytoremediation, Vol. 21, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 93-111.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - “Parent teams” and the everyday interactions of co–parenting in stepfamilies
AU - Braithwaite, Dawn O.
AU - McBride, M. Chad
AU - Schrodt, Paul
PY - 2003/1/1
Y1 - 2003/1/1
N2 - Family scholars have yet to explore substantially the day–to–day interactions of stepfamily systems. Our focus was on the everyday interactions of parent teams, adults who are co–parenting within different stepfamily households, describing the characteristics of their communication. Twenty–two parents, stepparents, and partners (N = 22) kept diaries for two weeks, each time they interacted with an adult in the other household. Results detail the frequency, timing, location, and length of interactions; initiator, channel, and topics; and reasons for interaction. Interactions were short, everyday encounters rather than extended, planned meetings. The majority of the interactions were via telephone, followed by face–to–face and electronic mail. Participants cited convenience and proximity as reasons for choosing these channels. The majority of topics discussed involved issues surrounding the children, involved little conflict, and adults were moderately satisfied with the interactions. Results suggest that these parent teams had achieved a state of equilibrium and developed ways to interact that worked reasonably well.
AB - Family scholars have yet to explore substantially the day–to–day interactions of stepfamily systems. Our focus was on the everyday interactions of parent teams, adults who are co–parenting within different stepfamily households, describing the characteristics of their communication. Twenty–two parents, stepparents, and partners (N = 22) kept diaries for two weeks, each time they interacted with an adult in the other household. Results detail the frequency, timing, location, and length of interactions; initiator, channel, and topics; and reasons for interaction. Interactions were short, everyday encounters rather than extended, planned meetings. The majority of the interactions were via telephone, followed by face–to–face and electronic mail. Participants cited convenience and proximity as reasons for choosing these channels. The majority of topics discussed involved issues surrounding the children, involved little conflict, and adults were moderately satisfied with the interactions. Results suggest that these parent teams had achieved a state of equilibrium and developed ways to interact that worked reasonably well.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064784911&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064784911&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08934210309384493
DO - 10.1080/08934210309384493
M3 - Article
VL - 21
SP - 93
EP - 111
JO - International Journal of Phytoremediation
JF - International Journal of Phytoremediation
SN - 1522-6514
IS - 1
ER -