Patient and physician attitudes to using medications with religiously forbidden ingredients

S. Pirzada Sattar, Mohammed Shakeel Ahmed, James Madison, Denise R. Olsen, Subhash Bhatia, Shahid Ellahi, Farhan Majeed, Sriram Ramaswamy, Frederick Petty, Daniel R. Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over 1000 medications contain pork- and/or beef-derived gelatin and stearic acid as inert ingredients. Use of these medications in patients with religious beliefs against consumption of these ingredients might constitute an ethical conflict. OBJECTIVE: To assess patients' and physicians' attitudes about using medications with religiously prohibited ingredients derived from pork and/or beef. METHODS: In this pilot study, 100 patients and 100 physicians completed a survey designed to assess their knowledge and opinion on using medications that might contain inert ingredients derived from animals whose consumption offends followers of certain religions. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients surveyed, most (84%) reported that they were not aware that several medications contained ingredients derived from pork and/or beef. About 63% of the patients wanted their physicians, and 35% of the patients wanted their non-physician healthcare providers (pharmacists, nurses), to inform them when using such medications. Thirteen percent of the patients shared religious reasons for not consuming pork and/or beef products. Approximately 70% of physicians were unaware that several medications contain ingredients that might be against their patients' religion, and most (70%) thought that it was important to inform their patients if such drugs were prescribed. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that both patients and physicians think that patients should be informed whenever medications that contain pork- and/or beef-derived products are prescribed. The use of medications with these ingredients is an ethical issue. Informing patients about this issue promotes respect for their religious beliefs and may promote therapeutic alliance; therefore, this might have public health implications and needs further research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1830-1835
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Pharmacotherapy
Volume38
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2004

Fingerprint

Physicians
Religion
Red Meat
Gelatin
Pharmacists
Ethics
Health Personnel
Public Health
Nurses
Research
Pharmaceutical Preparations

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

Cite this

Sattar, S. P., Ahmed, M. S., Madison, J., Olsen, D. R., Bhatia, S., Ellahi, S., ... Wilson, D. R. (2004). Patient and physician attitudes to using medications with religiously forbidden ingredients. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 38(11), 1830-1835. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1E001

Patient and physician attitudes to using medications with religiously forbidden ingredients. / Sattar, S. Pirzada; Ahmed, Mohammed Shakeel; Madison, James; Olsen, Denise R.; Bhatia, Subhash; Ellahi, Shahid; Majeed, Farhan; Ramaswamy, Sriram; Petty, Frederick; Wilson, Daniel R.

In: Annals of Pharmacotherapy, Vol. 38, No. 11, 11.2004, p. 1830-1835.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Sattar, SP, Ahmed, MS, Madison, J, Olsen, DR, Bhatia, S, Ellahi, S, Majeed, F, Ramaswamy, S, Petty, F & Wilson, DR 2004, 'Patient and physician attitudes to using medications with religiously forbidden ingredients', Annals of Pharmacotherapy, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1830-1835. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1E001
Sattar, S. Pirzada ; Ahmed, Mohammed Shakeel ; Madison, James ; Olsen, Denise R. ; Bhatia, Subhash ; Ellahi, Shahid ; Majeed, Farhan ; Ramaswamy, Sriram ; Petty, Frederick ; Wilson, Daniel R. / Patient and physician attitudes to using medications with religiously forbidden ingredients. In: Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2004 ; Vol. 38, No. 11. pp. 1830-1835.
@article{200539a7e547453b9bf93dbe396d5cbf,
title = "Patient and physician attitudes to using medications with religiously forbidden ingredients",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Over 1000 medications contain pork- and/or beef-derived gelatin and stearic acid as inert ingredients. Use of these medications in patients with religious beliefs against consumption of these ingredients might constitute an ethical conflict. OBJECTIVE: To assess patients' and physicians' attitudes about using medications with religiously prohibited ingredients derived from pork and/or beef. METHODS: In this pilot study, 100 patients and 100 physicians completed a survey designed to assess their knowledge and opinion on using medications that might contain inert ingredients derived from animals whose consumption offends followers of certain religions. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients surveyed, most (84{\%}) reported that they were not aware that several medications contained ingredients derived from pork and/or beef. About 63{\%} of the patients wanted their physicians, and 35{\%} of the patients wanted their non-physician healthcare providers (pharmacists, nurses), to inform them when using such medications. Thirteen percent of the patients shared religious reasons for not consuming pork and/or beef products. Approximately 70{\%} of physicians were unaware that several medications contain ingredients that might be against their patients' religion, and most (70{\%}) thought that it was important to inform their patients if such drugs were prescribed. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that both patients and physicians think that patients should be informed whenever medications that contain pork- and/or beef-derived products are prescribed. The use of medications with these ingredients is an ethical issue. Informing patients about this issue promotes respect for their religious beliefs and may promote therapeutic alliance; therefore, this might have public health implications and needs further research.",
author = "Sattar, {S. Pirzada} and Ahmed, {Mohammed Shakeel} and James Madison and Olsen, {Denise R.} and Subhash Bhatia and Shahid Ellahi and Farhan Majeed and Sriram Ramaswamy and Frederick Petty and Wilson, {Daniel R.}",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1345/aph.1E001",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "1830--1835",
journal = "Annals of Pharmacotherapy",
issn = "1060-0280",
publisher = "Harvey Whitney Books Company",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient and physician attitudes to using medications with religiously forbidden ingredients

AU - Sattar, S. Pirzada

AU - Ahmed, Mohammed Shakeel

AU - Madison, James

AU - Olsen, Denise R.

AU - Bhatia, Subhash

AU - Ellahi, Shahid

AU - Majeed, Farhan

AU - Ramaswamy, Sriram

AU - Petty, Frederick

AU - Wilson, Daniel R.

PY - 2004/11

Y1 - 2004/11

N2 - BACKGROUND: Over 1000 medications contain pork- and/or beef-derived gelatin and stearic acid as inert ingredients. Use of these medications in patients with religious beliefs against consumption of these ingredients might constitute an ethical conflict. OBJECTIVE: To assess patients' and physicians' attitudes about using medications with religiously prohibited ingredients derived from pork and/or beef. METHODS: In this pilot study, 100 patients and 100 physicians completed a survey designed to assess their knowledge and opinion on using medications that might contain inert ingredients derived from animals whose consumption offends followers of certain religions. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients surveyed, most (84%) reported that they were not aware that several medications contained ingredients derived from pork and/or beef. About 63% of the patients wanted their physicians, and 35% of the patients wanted their non-physician healthcare providers (pharmacists, nurses), to inform them when using such medications. Thirteen percent of the patients shared religious reasons for not consuming pork and/or beef products. Approximately 70% of physicians were unaware that several medications contain ingredients that might be against their patients' religion, and most (70%) thought that it was important to inform their patients if such drugs were prescribed. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that both patients and physicians think that patients should be informed whenever medications that contain pork- and/or beef-derived products are prescribed. The use of medications with these ingredients is an ethical issue. Informing patients about this issue promotes respect for their religious beliefs and may promote therapeutic alliance; therefore, this might have public health implications and needs further research.

AB - BACKGROUND: Over 1000 medications contain pork- and/or beef-derived gelatin and stearic acid as inert ingredients. Use of these medications in patients with religious beliefs against consumption of these ingredients might constitute an ethical conflict. OBJECTIVE: To assess patients' and physicians' attitudes about using medications with religiously prohibited ingredients derived from pork and/or beef. METHODS: In this pilot study, 100 patients and 100 physicians completed a survey designed to assess their knowledge and opinion on using medications that might contain inert ingredients derived from animals whose consumption offends followers of certain religions. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients surveyed, most (84%) reported that they were not aware that several medications contained ingredients derived from pork and/or beef. About 63% of the patients wanted their physicians, and 35% of the patients wanted their non-physician healthcare providers (pharmacists, nurses), to inform them when using such medications. Thirteen percent of the patients shared religious reasons for not consuming pork and/or beef products. Approximately 70% of physicians were unaware that several medications contain ingredients that might be against their patients' religion, and most (70%) thought that it was important to inform their patients if such drugs were prescribed. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that both patients and physicians think that patients should be informed whenever medications that contain pork- and/or beef-derived products are prescribed. The use of medications with these ingredients is an ethical issue. Informing patients about this issue promotes respect for their religious beliefs and may promote therapeutic alliance; therefore, this might have public health implications and needs further research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7044220761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7044220761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1345/aph.1E001

DO - 10.1345/aph.1E001

M3 - Review article

VL - 38

SP - 1830

EP - 1835

JO - Annals of Pharmacotherapy

JF - Annals of Pharmacotherapy

SN - 1060-0280

IS - 11

ER -