Penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries: Ongoing dilemma - Which cavity and when?

Juan A. Asensio, Hector Arroyo, William Veloz, Walter Forno, Esteban Gambaro, Gustavo A. Roldan, James Murray, George Velmahos, Demetrios Demetriades

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aims of this study were to (1) define characteristics for the thoracoabdominal injury patient population; (2) describe sequences of surgical interventions with combined procedures (i.e., thoracotomy and laparotomy); and (3) describe pitfalls leading to inappropriate sequencing of surgical interventions for thoracoabdominal injuries. It was a retrospective 4-year study (January 1995 to December 1998) conducted at an urban level I trauma center. The study population comprised 254 patients who had sustained thoracoabdominal injuries requiring surgical intervention: 187 (73%) gunshot wounds (GSWs), 64 (25%) stab wounds (SWs), and 3 (2%) shotgun wounds (STWs). The mean revised (RTS) was 6.04; the mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 27; the mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 3000 mi. The overall survival was 175 of 254 (69%). Of the 254, 51 (20%) underwent emergency department (ED) thoracotmy. Altogether, 73 (29%) underwent combined thoracotomy and laparotomy: 59 (81%) GSW, 13 (18%) SW, 1 (1%) STW (mean RTS 5.2, mean ISS 34, mean EBL 6800 mi). Overall survival was 30 of these 73 (41%). A total of 21 of the 73 (29%) underwent ED thoracotomy. In group I laparotomy then thoracotomy: Lap + Thor, n = 34) the initial procedure was interrupted in 18 (53%). In group II (thoracotomy then laparotomy: Thor + Lap, n = 39) the initial procedure was interrupted in 14 (36%). Pitfalls leading to inappropriate surgical sequencing were persistent hypotension (13/73, 18%) and misleading chest tube output (8/73, 10%). It was concluded that penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries incur high mortality (31%), and the mortality doubles for patients who require combined procedures (59%). Inappropriate surgical sequencing occurred in 32 of 73 (44%) patients undergoing combined procedures. Persistent hypotension, indicating that the wrong cavity was accessed, and misleading chest tube output are the leading pitfalls in thoracoabdominal injury management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)539-543
Number of pages5
JournalWorld Journal of Surgery
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thoracotomy
Laparotomy
Wounds and Injuries
Stab Wounds
Chest Tubes
Gunshot Wounds
Injury Severity Score
Firearms
Hypotension
Hospital Emergency Service
Survival
Mortality
Trauma Centers
Intraoperative Complications
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Asensio, J. A., Arroyo, H., Veloz, W., Forno, W., Gambaro, E., Roldan, G. A., ... Demetriades, D. (2002). Penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries: Ongoing dilemma - Which cavity and when? World Journal of Surgery, 26(5), 539-543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-001-0147-8

Penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries : Ongoing dilemma - Which cavity and when? / Asensio, Juan A.; Arroyo, Hector; Veloz, William; Forno, Walter; Gambaro, Esteban; Roldan, Gustavo A.; Murray, James; Velmahos, George; Demetriades, Demetrios.

In: World Journal of Surgery, Vol. 26, No. 5, 05.2002, p. 539-543.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Asensio, JA, Arroyo, H, Veloz, W, Forno, W, Gambaro, E, Roldan, GA, Murray, J, Velmahos, G & Demetriades, D 2002, 'Penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries: Ongoing dilemma - Which cavity and when?', World Journal of Surgery, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 539-543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-001-0147-8
Asensio, Juan A. ; Arroyo, Hector ; Veloz, William ; Forno, Walter ; Gambaro, Esteban ; Roldan, Gustavo A. ; Murray, James ; Velmahos, George ; Demetriades, Demetrios. / Penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries : Ongoing dilemma - Which cavity and when?. In: World Journal of Surgery. 2002 ; Vol. 26, No. 5. pp. 539-543.
@article{b7e5a9bc05204c59969a05d57b6f74a1,
title = "Penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries: Ongoing dilemma - Which cavity and when?",
abstract = "The aims of this study were to (1) define characteristics for the thoracoabdominal injury patient population; (2) describe sequences of surgical interventions with combined procedures (i.e., thoracotomy and laparotomy); and (3) describe pitfalls leading to inappropriate sequencing of surgical interventions for thoracoabdominal injuries. It was a retrospective 4-year study (January 1995 to December 1998) conducted at an urban level I trauma center. The study population comprised 254 patients who had sustained thoracoabdominal injuries requiring surgical intervention: 187 (73{\%}) gunshot wounds (GSWs), 64 (25{\%}) stab wounds (SWs), and 3 (2{\%}) shotgun wounds (STWs). The mean revised (RTS) was 6.04; the mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 27; the mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 3000 mi. The overall survival was 175 of 254 (69{\%}). Of the 254, 51 (20{\%}) underwent emergency department (ED) thoracotmy. Altogether, 73 (29{\%}) underwent combined thoracotomy and laparotomy: 59 (81{\%}) GSW, 13 (18{\%}) SW, 1 (1{\%}) STW (mean RTS 5.2, mean ISS 34, mean EBL 6800 mi). Overall survival was 30 of these 73 (41{\%}). A total of 21 of the 73 (29{\%}) underwent ED thoracotomy. In group I laparotomy then thoracotomy: Lap + Thor, n = 34) the initial procedure was interrupted in 18 (53{\%}). In group II (thoracotomy then laparotomy: Thor + Lap, n = 39) the initial procedure was interrupted in 14 (36{\%}). Pitfalls leading to inappropriate surgical sequencing were persistent hypotension (13/73, 18{\%}) and misleading chest tube output (8/73, 10{\%}). It was concluded that penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries incur high mortality (31{\%}), and the mortality doubles for patients who require combined procedures (59{\%}). Inappropriate surgical sequencing occurred in 32 of 73 (44{\%}) patients undergoing combined procedures. Persistent hypotension, indicating that the wrong cavity was accessed, and misleading chest tube output are the leading pitfalls in thoracoabdominal injury management.",
author = "Asensio, {Juan A.} and Hector Arroyo and William Veloz and Walter Forno and Esteban Gambaro and Roldan, {Gustavo A.} and James Murray and George Velmahos and Demetrios Demetriades",
year = "2002",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s00268-001-0147-8",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "539--543",
journal = "World Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0364-2313",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries

T2 - Ongoing dilemma - Which cavity and when?

AU - Asensio, Juan A.

AU - Arroyo, Hector

AU - Veloz, William

AU - Forno, Walter

AU - Gambaro, Esteban

AU - Roldan, Gustavo A.

AU - Murray, James

AU - Velmahos, George

AU - Demetriades, Demetrios

PY - 2002/5

Y1 - 2002/5

N2 - The aims of this study were to (1) define characteristics for the thoracoabdominal injury patient population; (2) describe sequences of surgical interventions with combined procedures (i.e., thoracotomy and laparotomy); and (3) describe pitfalls leading to inappropriate sequencing of surgical interventions for thoracoabdominal injuries. It was a retrospective 4-year study (January 1995 to December 1998) conducted at an urban level I trauma center. The study population comprised 254 patients who had sustained thoracoabdominal injuries requiring surgical intervention: 187 (73%) gunshot wounds (GSWs), 64 (25%) stab wounds (SWs), and 3 (2%) shotgun wounds (STWs). The mean revised (RTS) was 6.04; the mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 27; the mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 3000 mi. The overall survival was 175 of 254 (69%). Of the 254, 51 (20%) underwent emergency department (ED) thoracotmy. Altogether, 73 (29%) underwent combined thoracotomy and laparotomy: 59 (81%) GSW, 13 (18%) SW, 1 (1%) STW (mean RTS 5.2, mean ISS 34, mean EBL 6800 mi). Overall survival was 30 of these 73 (41%). A total of 21 of the 73 (29%) underwent ED thoracotomy. In group I laparotomy then thoracotomy: Lap + Thor, n = 34) the initial procedure was interrupted in 18 (53%). In group II (thoracotomy then laparotomy: Thor + Lap, n = 39) the initial procedure was interrupted in 14 (36%). Pitfalls leading to inappropriate surgical sequencing were persistent hypotension (13/73, 18%) and misleading chest tube output (8/73, 10%). It was concluded that penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries incur high mortality (31%), and the mortality doubles for patients who require combined procedures (59%). Inappropriate surgical sequencing occurred in 32 of 73 (44%) patients undergoing combined procedures. Persistent hypotension, indicating that the wrong cavity was accessed, and misleading chest tube output are the leading pitfalls in thoracoabdominal injury management.

AB - The aims of this study were to (1) define characteristics for the thoracoabdominal injury patient population; (2) describe sequences of surgical interventions with combined procedures (i.e., thoracotomy and laparotomy); and (3) describe pitfalls leading to inappropriate sequencing of surgical interventions for thoracoabdominal injuries. It was a retrospective 4-year study (January 1995 to December 1998) conducted at an urban level I trauma center. The study population comprised 254 patients who had sustained thoracoabdominal injuries requiring surgical intervention: 187 (73%) gunshot wounds (GSWs), 64 (25%) stab wounds (SWs), and 3 (2%) shotgun wounds (STWs). The mean revised (RTS) was 6.04; the mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 27; the mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 3000 mi. The overall survival was 175 of 254 (69%). Of the 254, 51 (20%) underwent emergency department (ED) thoracotmy. Altogether, 73 (29%) underwent combined thoracotomy and laparotomy: 59 (81%) GSW, 13 (18%) SW, 1 (1%) STW (mean RTS 5.2, mean ISS 34, mean EBL 6800 mi). Overall survival was 30 of these 73 (41%). A total of 21 of the 73 (29%) underwent ED thoracotomy. In group I laparotomy then thoracotomy: Lap + Thor, n = 34) the initial procedure was interrupted in 18 (53%). In group II (thoracotomy then laparotomy: Thor + Lap, n = 39) the initial procedure was interrupted in 14 (36%). Pitfalls leading to inappropriate surgical sequencing were persistent hypotension (13/73, 18%) and misleading chest tube output (8/73, 10%). It was concluded that penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries incur high mortality (31%), and the mortality doubles for patients who require combined procedures (59%). Inappropriate surgical sequencing occurred in 32 of 73 (44%) patients undergoing combined procedures. Persistent hypotension, indicating that the wrong cavity was accessed, and misleading chest tube output are the leading pitfalls in thoracoabdominal injury management.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036562654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036562654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00268-001-0147-8

DO - 10.1007/s00268-001-0147-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 12098041

AN - SCOPUS:0036562654

VL - 26

SP - 539

EP - 543

JO - World Journal of Surgery

JF - World Journal of Surgery

SN - 0364-2313

IS - 5

ER -