Abstract
Forty-five NCAA Division I male basketball teams totaling 437 players were surveyed about their height, weight, strength, speed, power, agility, body fatness, and aerobic capacity. Selected mean values ± SD were as follows: Height, 195.3 ± 8.9 cm; weight, 91.3 + 11.1 kg; % fat, 9.4 ± 15.2%; vertical jump 71.4 ± 10.4 cm; 1-RM bench press, 102.7 ± 18.9 kg; 1-RM squat, 152.2 + 36.5 kg; 40-yd dash, 4.81 ± 0.26 sec; agility 8.95 ± 0.53 sec; and 1 mile run, 5 min 40 sec ± 32 sec. Guards, forwards, and centers differed on all variables except bench press, 1.5-mile run, and agility. Guards were the smallest and leanest players and had the best vertical jump, speed, and strength relative to body weight, and the best mile run performance. Centers were the largest players, had the highest percent body fat and the poorest agility, 40-yd dash, and mile run times. Forwards and centers were similar in bench press and power clean, but forwards were stronger in both absolute and relative squat strength. Team mean scores were significantly different (p < 0.001) except for height, weight, 30-yd dash, and agility.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 214-218 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 1994 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Cite this
Physical and performance characteristics of NCAA division I male basketball players. / Latin, Richard W.; Berg, Kris; Baechle, Thomas R.
In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 8, No. 4, 01.01.1994, p. 214-218.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Physical and performance characteristics of NCAA division I male basketball players
AU - Latin, Richard W.
AU - Berg, Kris
AU - Baechle, Thomas R.
PY - 1994/1/1
Y1 - 1994/1/1
N2 - Forty-five NCAA Division I male basketball teams totaling 437 players were surveyed about their height, weight, strength, speed, power, agility, body fatness, and aerobic capacity. Selected mean values ± SD were as follows: Height, 195.3 ± 8.9 cm; weight, 91.3 + 11.1 kg; % fat, 9.4 ± 15.2%; vertical jump 71.4 ± 10.4 cm; 1-RM bench press, 102.7 ± 18.9 kg; 1-RM squat, 152.2 + 36.5 kg; 40-yd dash, 4.81 ± 0.26 sec; agility 8.95 ± 0.53 sec; and 1 mile run, 5 min 40 sec ± 32 sec. Guards, forwards, and centers differed on all variables except bench press, 1.5-mile run, and agility. Guards were the smallest and leanest players and had the best vertical jump, speed, and strength relative to body weight, and the best mile run performance. Centers were the largest players, had the highest percent body fat and the poorest agility, 40-yd dash, and mile run times. Forwards and centers were similar in bench press and power clean, but forwards were stronger in both absolute and relative squat strength. Team mean scores were significantly different (p < 0.001) except for height, weight, 30-yd dash, and agility.
AB - Forty-five NCAA Division I male basketball teams totaling 437 players were surveyed about their height, weight, strength, speed, power, agility, body fatness, and aerobic capacity. Selected mean values ± SD were as follows: Height, 195.3 ± 8.9 cm; weight, 91.3 + 11.1 kg; % fat, 9.4 ± 15.2%; vertical jump 71.4 ± 10.4 cm; 1-RM bench press, 102.7 ± 18.9 kg; 1-RM squat, 152.2 + 36.5 kg; 40-yd dash, 4.81 ± 0.26 sec; agility 8.95 ± 0.53 sec; and 1 mile run, 5 min 40 sec ± 32 sec. Guards, forwards, and centers differed on all variables except bench press, 1.5-mile run, and agility. Guards were the smallest and leanest players and had the best vertical jump, speed, and strength relative to body weight, and the best mile run performance. Centers were the largest players, had the highest percent body fat and the poorest agility, 40-yd dash, and mile run times. Forwards and centers were similar in bench press and power clean, but forwards were stronger in both absolute and relative squat strength. Team mean scores were significantly different (p < 0.001) except for height, weight, 30-yd dash, and agility.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042222269&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042222269&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1519/00124278-199411000-00002
DO - 10.1519/00124278-199411000-00002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0042222269
VL - 8
SP - 214
EP - 218
JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
SN - 1064-8011
IS - 4
ER -