Probing the relative contribution of the first and second responses to sensory gating indices

A meta-analysis

Wen Pin Chang, Cynthia L. Arfken, Monica P. Sangal, Nash N. Boutros

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sensory gating deficit in schizophrenia patients has been well-documented. However, a central conceptual issue, regarding whether the gating deficit results from an abnormal initial response (S1) or difficulty in attenuating the response to the repeating stimulus (S2), raise doubts about the validity and utility of the S2/S1 ratio as a measure of sensory gating. This meta-analysis study, therefore, sought to determine the consistency and relative magnitude of the effect of the two essential components (S1 and S2) and the ratio. The results of weighted random effects meta-analysis revealed that the overall effect sizes for the S1 amplitude, S2 amplitude, and P50 S2/S1 ratio were -0.19 (small), 0.65 (medium to large), and 0.93 (large), respectively. These results confirm that the S2/S1 ratio and the repeating (S2) stimulus differ robustly between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls in contrast to the consistent but smaller effect size for the S1 amplitude. These findings are more likely to reflect defective inhibition of repeating redundant input rather than an abnormal response to novel stimuli.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)980-992
Number of pages13
JournalPsychophysiology
Volume48
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Sensory Gating
Meta-Analysis
Schizophrenia
Inhibition (Psychology)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

Probing the relative contribution of the first and second responses to sensory gating indices : A meta-analysis. / Chang, Wen Pin; Arfken, Cynthia L.; Sangal, Monica P.; Boutros, Nash N.

In: Psychophysiology, Vol. 48, No. 7, 07.2011, p. 980-992.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chang, Wen Pin ; Arfken, Cynthia L. ; Sangal, Monica P. ; Boutros, Nash N. / Probing the relative contribution of the first and second responses to sensory gating indices : A meta-analysis. In: Psychophysiology. 2011 ; Vol. 48, No. 7. pp. 980-992.
@article{b87688dec67847b5894ba357752849f7,
title = "Probing the relative contribution of the first and second responses to sensory gating indices: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Sensory gating deficit in schizophrenia patients has been well-documented. However, a central conceptual issue, regarding whether the gating deficit results from an abnormal initial response (S1) or difficulty in attenuating the response to the repeating stimulus (S2), raise doubts about the validity and utility of the S2/S1 ratio as a measure of sensory gating. This meta-analysis study, therefore, sought to determine the consistency and relative magnitude of the effect of the two essential components (S1 and S2) and the ratio. The results of weighted random effects meta-analysis revealed that the overall effect sizes for the S1 amplitude, S2 amplitude, and P50 S2/S1 ratio were -0.19 (small), 0.65 (medium to large), and 0.93 (large), respectively. These results confirm that the S2/S1 ratio and the repeating (S2) stimulus differ robustly between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls in contrast to the consistent but smaller effect size for the S1 amplitude. These findings are more likely to reflect defective inhibition of repeating redundant input rather than an abnormal response to novel stimuli.",
author = "Chang, {Wen Pin} and Arfken, {Cynthia L.} and Sangal, {Monica P.} and Boutros, {Nash N.}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01168.x",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "980--992",
journal = "Psychophysiology",
issn = "0048-5772",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Probing the relative contribution of the first and second responses to sensory gating indices

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Chang, Wen Pin

AU - Arfken, Cynthia L.

AU - Sangal, Monica P.

AU - Boutros, Nash N.

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Sensory gating deficit in schizophrenia patients has been well-documented. However, a central conceptual issue, regarding whether the gating deficit results from an abnormal initial response (S1) or difficulty in attenuating the response to the repeating stimulus (S2), raise doubts about the validity and utility of the S2/S1 ratio as a measure of sensory gating. This meta-analysis study, therefore, sought to determine the consistency and relative magnitude of the effect of the two essential components (S1 and S2) and the ratio. The results of weighted random effects meta-analysis revealed that the overall effect sizes for the S1 amplitude, S2 amplitude, and P50 S2/S1 ratio were -0.19 (small), 0.65 (medium to large), and 0.93 (large), respectively. These results confirm that the S2/S1 ratio and the repeating (S2) stimulus differ robustly between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls in contrast to the consistent but smaller effect size for the S1 amplitude. These findings are more likely to reflect defective inhibition of repeating redundant input rather than an abnormal response to novel stimuli.

AB - Sensory gating deficit in schizophrenia patients has been well-documented. However, a central conceptual issue, regarding whether the gating deficit results from an abnormal initial response (S1) or difficulty in attenuating the response to the repeating stimulus (S2), raise doubts about the validity and utility of the S2/S1 ratio as a measure of sensory gating. This meta-analysis study, therefore, sought to determine the consistency and relative magnitude of the effect of the two essential components (S1 and S2) and the ratio. The results of weighted random effects meta-analysis revealed that the overall effect sizes for the S1 amplitude, S2 amplitude, and P50 S2/S1 ratio were -0.19 (small), 0.65 (medium to large), and 0.93 (large), respectively. These results confirm that the S2/S1 ratio and the repeating (S2) stimulus differ robustly between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls in contrast to the consistent but smaller effect size for the S1 amplitude. These findings are more likely to reflect defective inhibition of repeating redundant input rather than an abnormal response to novel stimuli.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957864211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957864211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01168.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01168.x

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 980

EP - 992

JO - Psychophysiology

JF - Psychophysiology

SN - 0048-5772

IS - 7

ER -