Psychological Safety

A Meta-Analytic Review and Extension

Michael Lance Frazier, Stav Fainshmidt, Ryan L. Klinger, Amir Pezeshkan, Veselina Vracheva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although psychological safety research has flourished in recent years, and despite the empirical support for the important role of psychological safety in the workplace, several critical questions remain. In order to address these questions, we aggregate theoretical and empirical works, and draw on 136 independent samples representing over 22,000 individuals and nearly 5,000 groups, to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis on the antecedents and outcomes of psychological safety. We not only present the nomological network of psychological safety but also extend this research in 4 important ways. First, we compare effect sizes to determine the relative effectiveness of antecedents to psychological safety. Second, we examine the extent to which psychological safety influences both task performance and organizational citizenship behaviors over and beyond related concepts such as positive leader relations and work engagement. Third, we examine whether research design characteristics and national culture alter validities within the nomological network, thus promoting a more accurate and contextualized understanding of psychological safety. Finally, we test the homology assumption by comparing the effect sizes of the antecedents and outcomes of psychological safety across individual and group levels of analysis. We conclude with a discussion of the areas in need of future examination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPersonnel Psychology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

Psychology
Safety
Psychological safety
Task Performance and Analysis
Research
Workplace
Meta-Analysis
Research Design
Effect size

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (Accepted/In press). Psychological Safety: A Meta-Analytic Review and Extension. Personnel Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12183

Psychological Safety : A Meta-Analytic Review and Extension. / Frazier, Michael Lance; Fainshmidt, Stav; Klinger, Ryan L.; Pezeshkan, Amir; Vracheva, Veselina.

In: Personnel Psychology, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Frazier, Michael Lance ; Fainshmidt, Stav ; Klinger, Ryan L. ; Pezeshkan, Amir ; Vracheva, Veselina. / Psychological Safety : A Meta-Analytic Review and Extension. In: Personnel Psychology. 2016.
@article{05cdd2ab91c34b1cac71c2ce5e038f0c,
title = "Psychological Safety: A Meta-Analytic Review and Extension",
abstract = "Although psychological safety research has flourished in recent years, and despite the empirical support for the important role of psychological safety in the workplace, several critical questions remain. In order to address these questions, we aggregate theoretical and empirical works, and draw on 136 independent samples representing over 22,000 individuals and nearly 5,000 groups, to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis on the antecedents and outcomes of psychological safety. We not only present the nomological network of psychological safety but also extend this research in 4 important ways. First, we compare effect sizes to determine the relative effectiveness of antecedents to psychological safety. Second, we examine the extent to which psychological safety influences both task performance and organizational citizenship behaviors over and beyond related concepts such as positive leader relations and work engagement. Third, we examine whether research design characteristics and national culture alter validities within the nomological network, thus promoting a more accurate and contextualized understanding of psychological safety. Finally, we test the homology assumption by comparing the effect sizes of the antecedents and outcomes of psychological safety across individual and group levels of analysis. We conclude with a discussion of the areas in need of future examination.",
author = "Frazier, {Michael Lance} and Stav Fainshmidt and Klinger, {Ryan L.} and Amir Pezeshkan and Veselina Vracheva",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1111/peps.12183",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Personnel Psychology",
issn = "0031-5826",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychological Safety

T2 - A Meta-Analytic Review and Extension

AU - Frazier, Michael Lance

AU - Fainshmidt, Stav

AU - Klinger, Ryan L.

AU - Pezeshkan, Amir

AU - Vracheva, Veselina

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Although psychological safety research has flourished in recent years, and despite the empirical support for the important role of psychological safety in the workplace, several critical questions remain. In order to address these questions, we aggregate theoretical and empirical works, and draw on 136 independent samples representing over 22,000 individuals and nearly 5,000 groups, to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis on the antecedents and outcomes of psychological safety. We not only present the nomological network of psychological safety but also extend this research in 4 important ways. First, we compare effect sizes to determine the relative effectiveness of antecedents to psychological safety. Second, we examine the extent to which psychological safety influences both task performance and organizational citizenship behaviors over and beyond related concepts such as positive leader relations and work engagement. Third, we examine whether research design characteristics and national culture alter validities within the nomological network, thus promoting a more accurate and contextualized understanding of psychological safety. Finally, we test the homology assumption by comparing the effect sizes of the antecedents and outcomes of psychological safety across individual and group levels of analysis. We conclude with a discussion of the areas in need of future examination.

AB - Although psychological safety research has flourished in recent years, and despite the empirical support for the important role of psychological safety in the workplace, several critical questions remain. In order to address these questions, we aggregate theoretical and empirical works, and draw on 136 independent samples representing over 22,000 individuals and nearly 5,000 groups, to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis on the antecedents and outcomes of psychological safety. We not only present the nomological network of psychological safety but also extend this research in 4 important ways. First, we compare effect sizes to determine the relative effectiveness of antecedents to psychological safety. Second, we examine the extent to which psychological safety influences both task performance and organizational citizenship behaviors over and beyond related concepts such as positive leader relations and work engagement. Third, we examine whether research design characteristics and national culture alter validities within the nomological network, thus promoting a more accurate and contextualized understanding of psychological safety. Finally, we test the homology assumption by comparing the effect sizes of the antecedents and outcomes of psychological safety across individual and group levels of analysis. We conclude with a discussion of the areas in need of future examination.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991498334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991498334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/peps.12183

DO - 10.1111/peps.12183

M3 - Article

JO - Personnel Psychology

JF - Personnel Psychology

SN - 0031-5826

ER -