Abstract
Fuzzy logic as a basis for modeling concepts was rejected by psychologists because of an influential paper published by Osherson and Smith in 1981. While Osherson and Smith were important and influential psychologists, they were not logicians. A critical analysis of their work reveals a series of tired arguments.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting, IFSA/NAFIPS 2013 |
| Pages | 854-859 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 31 2013 |
| Event | 9th Joint World Congress on Fuzzy Systems and NAFIPS Annual Meeting, IFSA/NAFIPS 2013 - Edmonton, AB, Canada Duration: Jun 24 2013 → Jun 28 2013 |
Publication series
| Name | Proceedings of the 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting, IFSA/NAFIPS 2013 |
|---|
Other
| Other | 9th Joint World Congress on Fuzzy Systems and NAFIPS Annual Meeting, IFSA/NAFIPS 2013 |
|---|---|
| Country | Canada |
| City | Edmonton, AB |
| Period | 6/24/13 → 6/28/13 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Computer Networks and Communications
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Psychologists: Are they logically fuzzy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
Wierman, M. J. (2013). Psychologists: Are they logically fuzzy? In Proceedings of the 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting, IFSA/NAFIPS 2013 (pp. 854-859). [6608512] (Proceedings of the 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting, IFSA/NAFIPS 2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608512