Abstract
Radiography is still the best diagnostic technique which is widely available to dentists. Digital radiography offers improved imaging through lower dose and lack of chemical processing. However, monitoring of incipient caries progression requires imaging systems which are as good as film with testing at the D1 level (WHO). Care is required in constructing valid caries models. Work is required to define the necessary digital image quality as measurement accuracy for monitoring caries progression may be as high as 0.15 mm. A case has been made for using the highest sensitivity possible, since caries is a disease where a 'wait and see' policy should produce no unnecessary treatment from increased false positives. Individual site monitoring should be performed on both low and high caries risk patients. High-risk subjects still need to be monitored since DMFS is not a valid site level predictor.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 69-72 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Dentomaxillofacial Radiology |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - May 1994 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Otorhinolaryngology
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
- Dentistry(all)
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Cite this
Radiographic caries diagnosis and monitoring. / Benn, Douglas.
In: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol. 23, No. 2, 05.1994, p. 69-72.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiographic caries diagnosis and monitoring
AU - Benn, Douglas
PY - 1994/5
Y1 - 1994/5
N2 - Radiography is still the best diagnostic technique which is widely available to dentists. Digital radiography offers improved imaging through lower dose and lack of chemical processing. However, monitoring of incipient caries progression requires imaging systems which are as good as film with testing at the D1 level (WHO). Care is required in constructing valid caries models. Work is required to define the necessary digital image quality as measurement accuracy for monitoring caries progression may be as high as 0.15 mm. A case has been made for using the highest sensitivity possible, since caries is a disease where a 'wait and see' policy should produce no unnecessary treatment from increased false positives. Individual site monitoring should be performed on both low and high caries risk patients. High-risk subjects still need to be monitored since DMFS is not a valid site level predictor.
AB - Radiography is still the best diagnostic technique which is widely available to dentists. Digital radiography offers improved imaging through lower dose and lack of chemical processing. However, monitoring of incipient caries progression requires imaging systems which are as good as film with testing at the D1 level (WHO). Care is required in constructing valid caries models. Work is required to define the necessary digital image quality as measurement accuracy for monitoring caries progression may be as high as 0.15 mm. A case has been made for using the highest sensitivity possible, since caries is a disease where a 'wait and see' policy should produce no unnecessary treatment from increased false positives. Individual site monitoring should be performed on both low and high caries risk patients. High-risk subjects still need to be monitored since DMFS is not a valid site level predictor.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028441045&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028441045&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Review article
C2 - 7835505
AN - SCOPUS:0028441045
VL - 23
SP - 69
EP - 72
JO - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
JF - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
SN - 0250-832X
IS - 2
ER -