Reciprocity and the Law of War

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This Article examines how the principle of reciprocity operates within the international law of war. Tracing the historical development and application of the law, the Article demonstrates that the existing law of war derives from a set of rules that are contingent on reciprocity. Contrary to common understanding, reciprocity strongly influences states' interpretation and application of the law of war. The Article first identifies an obligational component of reciprocity that restricts operation of the law to contests between parties with parallel legal commitments. Second, the Article identifies an observational component of the principle of reciprocity that permits parties to suspend or terminate observance when confronted with breach. Although the principle of reciprocity was softened by late twentieth century legal instruments, it continues to form a critical component of the law of war and guides both pragmatic and theoretical discourse. Regardless of normative conclusions about reciprocity as a precondition to application of the law, the Article's reciprocity-cognizant framework for understanding the law of war provides a useful platform for reform efforts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)365-434
Number of pages70
JournalHarvard International Law Journal
Volume50
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

law of war
reciprocity
legal usage
interpretation of the law
historical development
international law
pragmatics
twentieth century
commitment
reform
Law
discourse

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Reciprocity and the Law of War. / Watts, Sean.

In: Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 50, No. 2, 06.2009, p. 365-434.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1a8a51bdecbb4d6db685bbb78ace02e8,
title = "Reciprocity and the Law of War",
abstract = "This Article examines how the principle of reciprocity operates within the international law of war. Tracing the historical development and application of the law, the Article demonstrates that the existing law of war derives from a set of rules that are contingent on reciprocity. Contrary to common understanding, reciprocity strongly influences states' interpretation and application of the law of war. The Article first identifies an obligational component of reciprocity that restricts operation of the law to contests between parties with parallel legal commitments. Second, the Article identifies an observational component of the principle of reciprocity that permits parties to suspend or terminate observance when confronted with breach. Although the principle of reciprocity was softened by late twentieth century legal instruments, it continues to form a critical component of the law of war and guides both pragmatic and theoretical discourse. Regardless of normative conclusions about reciprocity as a precondition to application of the law, the Article's reciprocity-cognizant framework for understanding the law of war provides a useful platform for reform efforts.",
author = "Sean Watts",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "365--434",
journal = "Harvard International Law Journal",
issn = "0017-8063",
publisher = "Harvard University",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reciprocity and the Law of War

AU - Watts, Sean

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - This Article examines how the principle of reciprocity operates within the international law of war. Tracing the historical development and application of the law, the Article demonstrates that the existing law of war derives from a set of rules that are contingent on reciprocity. Contrary to common understanding, reciprocity strongly influences states' interpretation and application of the law of war. The Article first identifies an obligational component of reciprocity that restricts operation of the law to contests between parties with parallel legal commitments. Second, the Article identifies an observational component of the principle of reciprocity that permits parties to suspend or terminate observance when confronted with breach. Although the principle of reciprocity was softened by late twentieth century legal instruments, it continues to form a critical component of the law of war and guides both pragmatic and theoretical discourse. Regardless of normative conclusions about reciprocity as a precondition to application of the law, the Article's reciprocity-cognizant framework for understanding the law of war provides a useful platform for reform efforts.

AB - This Article examines how the principle of reciprocity operates within the international law of war. Tracing the historical development and application of the law, the Article demonstrates that the existing law of war derives from a set of rules that are contingent on reciprocity. Contrary to common understanding, reciprocity strongly influences states' interpretation and application of the law of war. The Article first identifies an obligational component of reciprocity that restricts operation of the law to contests between parties with parallel legal commitments. Second, the Article identifies an observational component of the principle of reciprocity that permits parties to suspend or terminate observance when confronted with breach. Although the principle of reciprocity was softened by late twentieth century legal instruments, it continues to form a critical component of the law of war and guides both pragmatic and theoretical discourse. Regardless of normative conclusions about reciprocity as a precondition to application of the law, the Article's reciprocity-cognizant framework for understanding the law of war provides a useful platform for reform efforts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69249166680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69249166680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:69249166680

VL - 50

SP - 365

EP - 434

JO - Harvard International Law Journal

JF - Harvard International Law Journal

SN - 0017-8063

IS - 2

ER -