Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair

Results of a Consensus meeting in Palermo, Italy, 28-30 June 2012

F. E. Muysoms, E. B. Deerenberg, E. Peeters, F. Agresta, F. Berrevoet, G. Campanelli, W. Ceelen, G. G. Champault, F. Corcione, D. Cuccurullo, A. C. Debeaux, U. A. Dietz, Robert Joseph Fitzgibbons, J. F. Gillion, R. D. Hilgers, J. Jeekel, I. Kyle-Leinhase, F. Köckerling, V. Mandala, A. Montgomery & 6 others S. Morales-Conde, R. K J Simmermacher, V. Schumpelick, M. Śmietański, M. Walgenbach, M. Miserez

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The literature dealing with abdominal wall surgery is often flawed due to lack of adherence to accepted reporting standards and statistical methodology. Materials and methods: The EuraHS Working Group (European Registry of Abdominal Wall Hernias) organised a consensus meeting of surgical experts and researchers with an interest in abdominal wall surgery, including a statistician, the editors of the journal Hernia and scientists experienced in meta-analysis. Detailed discussions took place to identify the basic ground rules necessary to improve the quality of research reports related to abdominal wall reconstruction. Results: A list of recommendations was formulated including more general issues on the scientific methodology and statistical approach. Standards and statements are available, each depending on the type of study that is being reported: the CONSORT statement for the Randomised Controlled Trials, the TREND statement for non randomised interventional studies, the STROBE statement for observational studies, the STARLITE statement for literature searches, the MOOSE statement for metaanalyses of observational studies and the PRISMA statement for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A number of recommendations were made, including the use of previously published standard definitions and classifications relating to hernia variables and treatment; the use of the validated Clavien-Dindo classification to report complications in hernia surgery; the use of "time-to-event analysis" to report data on "freedom-of-recurrence" rather than the use of recurrence rates, because it is more sensitive and accounts for the patients that are lost to follow-up compared with other reporting methods. Conclusion: A set of recommendations for reporting outcome results of abdominal wall surgery was formulated as guidance for researchers. It is anticipated that the use of these recommendations will increase the quality and meaning of abdominal wall surgery research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-433
Number of pages11
JournalHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Abdominal Wall
Italy
Hernia
Observational Studies
Meta-Analysis
Research Personnel
Abdominal Hernia
Recurrence
Lost to Follow-Up
Registries
Randomized Controlled Trials
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair : Results of a Consensus meeting in Palermo, Italy, 28-30 June 2012. / Muysoms, F. E.; Deerenberg, E. B.; Peeters, E.; Agresta, F.; Berrevoet, F.; Campanelli, G.; Ceelen, W.; Champault, G. G.; Corcione, F.; Cuccurullo, D.; Debeaux, A. C.; Dietz, U. A.; Fitzgibbons, Robert Joseph; Gillion, J. F.; Hilgers, R. D.; Jeekel, J.; Kyle-Leinhase, I.; Köckerling, F.; Mandala, V.; Montgomery, A.; Morales-Conde, S.; Simmermacher, R. K J; Schumpelick, V.; Śmietański, M.; Walgenbach, M.; Miserez, M.

In: Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, Vol. 17, No. 4, 08.2013, p. 423-433.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Muysoms, FE, Deerenberg, EB, Peeters, E, Agresta, F, Berrevoet, F, Campanelli, G, Ceelen, W, Champault, GG, Corcione, F, Cuccurullo, D, Debeaux, AC, Dietz, UA, Fitzgibbons, RJ, Gillion, JF, Hilgers, RD, Jeekel, J, Kyle-Leinhase, I, Köckerling, F, Mandala, V, Montgomery, A, Morales-Conde, S, Simmermacher, RKJ, Schumpelick, V, Śmietański, M, Walgenbach, M & Miserez, M 2013, 'Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair: Results of a Consensus meeting in Palermo, Italy, 28-30 June 2012', Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 423-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1108-5
Muysoms, F. E. ; Deerenberg, E. B. ; Peeters, E. ; Agresta, F. ; Berrevoet, F. ; Campanelli, G. ; Ceelen, W. ; Champault, G. G. ; Corcione, F. ; Cuccurullo, D. ; Debeaux, A. C. ; Dietz, U. A. ; Fitzgibbons, Robert Joseph ; Gillion, J. F. ; Hilgers, R. D. ; Jeekel, J. ; Kyle-Leinhase, I. ; Köckerling, F. ; Mandala, V. ; Montgomery, A. ; Morales-Conde, S. ; Simmermacher, R. K J ; Schumpelick, V. ; Śmietański, M. ; Walgenbach, M. ; Miserez, M. / Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair : Results of a Consensus meeting in Palermo, Italy, 28-30 June 2012. In: Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery. 2013 ; Vol. 17, No. 4. pp. 423-433.
@article{fc97f75aabcb4b64aad931cc23d0efc6,
title = "Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair: Results of a Consensus meeting in Palermo, Italy, 28-30 June 2012",
abstract = "Background: The literature dealing with abdominal wall surgery is often flawed due to lack of adherence to accepted reporting standards and statistical methodology. Materials and methods: The EuraHS Working Group (European Registry of Abdominal Wall Hernias) organised a consensus meeting of surgical experts and researchers with an interest in abdominal wall surgery, including a statistician, the editors of the journal Hernia and scientists experienced in meta-analysis. Detailed discussions took place to identify the basic ground rules necessary to improve the quality of research reports related to abdominal wall reconstruction. Results: A list of recommendations was formulated including more general issues on the scientific methodology and statistical approach. Standards and statements are available, each depending on the type of study that is being reported: the CONSORT statement for the Randomised Controlled Trials, the TREND statement for non randomised interventional studies, the STROBE statement for observational studies, the STARLITE statement for literature searches, the MOOSE statement for metaanalyses of observational studies and the PRISMA statement for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A number of recommendations were made, including the use of previously published standard definitions and classifications relating to hernia variables and treatment; the use of the validated Clavien-Dindo classification to report complications in hernia surgery; the use of {"}time-to-event analysis{"} to report data on {"}freedom-of-recurrence{"} rather than the use of recurrence rates, because it is more sensitive and accounts for the patients that are lost to follow-up compared with other reporting methods. Conclusion: A set of recommendations for reporting outcome results of abdominal wall surgery was formulated as guidance for researchers. It is anticipated that the use of these recommendations will increase the quality and meaning of abdominal wall surgery research.",
author = "Muysoms, {F. E.} and Deerenberg, {E. B.} and E. Peeters and F. Agresta and F. Berrevoet and G. Campanelli and W. Ceelen and Champault, {G. G.} and F. Corcione and D. Cuccurullo and Debeaux, {A. C.} and Dietz, {U. A.} and Fitzgibbons, {Robert Joseph} and Gillion, {J. F.} and Hilgers, {R. D.} and J. Jeekel and I. Kyle-Leinhase and F. K{\"o}ckerling and V. Mandala and A. Montgomery and S. Morales-Conde and Simmermacher, {R. K J} and V. Schumpelick and M. Śmietański and M. Walgenbach and M. Miserez",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s10029-013-1108-5",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "423--433",
journal = "Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery",
issn = "1265-4906",
publisher = "Springer Paris",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair

T2 - Results of a Consensus meeting in Palermo, Italy, 28-30 June 2012

AU - Muysoms, F. E.

AU - Deerenberg, E. B.

AU - Peeters, E.

AU - Agresta, F.

AU - Berrevoet, F.

AU - Campanelli, G.

AU - Ceelen, W.

AU - Champault, G. G.

AU - Corcione, F.

AU - Cuccurullo, D.

AU - Debeaux, A. C.

AU - Dietz, U. A.

AU - Fitzgibbons, Robert Joseph

AU - Gillion, J. F.

AU - Hilgers, R. D.

AU - Jeekel, J.

AU - Kyle-Leinhase, I.

AU - Köckerling, F.

AU - Mandala, V.

AU - Montgomery, A.

AU - Morales-Conde, S.

AU - Simmermacher, R. K J

AU - Schumpelick, V.

AU - Śmietański, M.

AU - Walgenbach, M.

AU - Miserez, M.

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - Background: The literature dealing with abdominal wall surgery is often flawed due to lack of adherence to accepted reporting standards and statistical methodology. Materials and methods: The EuraHS Working Group (European Registry of Abdominal Wall Hernias) organised a consensus meeting of surgical experts and researchers with an interest in abdominal wall surgery, including a statistician, the editors of the journal Hernia and scientists experienced in meta-analysis. Detailed discussions took place to identify the basic ground rules necessary to improve the quality of research reports related to abdominal wall reconstruction. Results: A list of recommendations was formulated including more general issues on the scientific methodology and statistical approach. Standards and statements are available, each depending on the type of study that is being reported: the CONSORT statement for the Randomised Controlled Trials, the TREND statement for non randomised interventional studies, the STROBE statement for observational studies, the STARLITE statement for literature searches, the MOOSE statement for metaanalyses of observational studies and the PRISMA statement for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A number of recommendations were made, including the use of previously published standard definitions and classifications relating to hernia variables and treatment; the use of the validated Clavien-Dindo classification to report complications in hernia surgery; the use of "time-to-event analysis" to report data on "freedom-of-recurrence" rather than the use of recurrence rates, because it is more sensitive and accounts for the patients that are lost to follow-up compared with other reporting methods. Conclusion: A set of recommendations for reporting outcome results of abdominal wall surgery was formulated as guidance for researchers. It is anticipated that the use of these recommendations will increase the quality and meaning of abdominal wall surgery research.

AB - Background: The literature dealing with abdominal wall surgery is often flawed due to lack of adherence to accepted reporting standards and statistical methodology. Materials and methods: The EuraHS Working Group (European Registry of Abdominal Wall Hernias) organised a consensus meeting of surgical experts and researchers with an interest in abdominal wall surgery, including a statistician, the editors of the journal Hernia and scientists experienced in meta-analysis. Detailed discussions took place to identify the basic ground rules necessary to improve the quality of research reports related to abdominal wall reconstruction. Results: A list of recommendations was formulated including more general issues on the scientific methodology and statistical approach. Standards and statements are available, each depending on the type of study that is being reported: the CONSORT statement for the Randomised Controlled Trials, the TREND statement for non randomised interventional studies, the STROBE statement for observational studies, the STARLITE statement for literature searches, the MOOSE statement for metaanalyses of observational studies and the PRISMA statement for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A number of recommendations were made, including the use of previously published standard definitions and classifications relating to hernia variables and treatment; the use of the validated Clavien-Dindo classification to report complications in hernia surgery; the use of "time-to-event analysis" to report data on "freedom-of-recurrence" rather than the use of recurrence rates, because it is more sensitive and accounts for the patients that are lost to follow-up compared with other reporting methods. Conclusion: A set of recommendations for reporting outcome results of abdominal wall surgery was formulated as guidance for researchers. It is anticipated that the use of these recommendations will increase the quality and meaning of abdominal wall surgery research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881317584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881317584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10029-013-1108-5

DO - 10.1007/s10029-013-1108-5

M3 - Review article

VL - 17

SP - 423

EP - 433

JO - Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery

JF - Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery

SN - 1265-4906

IS - 4

ER -